Self-report measures are used to study the degree of victimisation in children that have experienced violence. Very little methodological attention is, however, paid to development of these measures. In this article, we will analyse parents’ free-text comments in response to a self-report survey of their own violent behaviour towards their children. Themes presented by parents concerning violence against children as a phenomenon will be analysed and methodological input of these free-text comments in a self-report survey will be examined. Analysis is based on survey data collected in Finland in 2011 (N = 3170) including 2047 free-text comments. Based on the thematic analysis of those comments, four themes were phrased: making sense of the responses, defining violence, children and violence in society and experiencing exclusion. Parents’ comments with respect to these themes reflected the complexity of what actually constitutes violence against children. Analysis also showed that free-text comments are a valuable and ethically sound tool for developing the self-report measure.
AresG.GiménezA.BarreiroC.GámbaroA. (2010) Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques. Food Quality and Preference21: 286–294.
2.
BeckettC.CleggS. (2007) Qualitative data from a postal questionnaire: Questioning the presumption of the value of presence. International Journal of Social Research Methodology10: 307–317.
3.
BoyntonP. M.GreenhalghT. (2004) Selecting, designing and developing your questionnaire. British Medical Journal328: 1312–1315.
4.
ChristiansC. G. (2000) Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In: DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (eds) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 133–155.
5.
ClémentM.-E.ChamberlandC. (2014) Trend in corporal punishment and attitudes in favour of this practice: Towards a change in societal norms. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health33: 13–29.
6.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996) Making sense of qualitative data, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
EllisL.HartleyR. D.WalshA. (2010) Research methods in criminal justice and criminology: An interdisciplinary approach, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
Ellonen, N., & Fagerlund, M. (2015). Parents’ perceptions of answering a survey on violence against children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Online ahead of print publication.
9.
Ellonen, N., Kääriäinen, J., Salmi, V., & Sariola, H. (2008). Lasten ja nuorten vkivaltakokemukset. [Violence against children and adolescents in 2008.] Tampere: Police University College.
10.
EllonenN.KääriäinenJ.SariolaH.Helweg-LarsenK.Bøving-LarsenH. (2011) Children’s experiences of parental violence in Danish and Finnish families: comparative perspective. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Crime and Crime Prevention12: 173–197.
11.
Ellonen, N., Lucas, S., Tindberg, Y., & Janson, S. (2016) Parents’ self-reported use of corporal punishment and other humiliating upbringing practices in Finland and Sweden – a comparative study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12.
EllonenN.PösöT. (2010) Children’s experiences of completing a computer-based violence survey: Ethical implications. Children & Society25: 470–481.
13.
EllonenN.PösöT. (2014) Hesitation as a system response to children expose to violence. The International Journal of Children’s Rights22: 730–747.
14.
FagerlundM.PeltolaM.KääriäinenJ.EllonenN.SariolaH. (2014) Lasten ja nuorten väkivaltakokemukset 2013: Lapsiuhritutkimuksen tuloksia. [Experiences of Violence among Children and Young People 2013: Results from the Finnish Child Victim Survey], Tampere, Finland: Police University College.
15.
FairweatherJ. R.RinneT.SteelG. (2012) Computer-assisted, self-interviewing (CASI) compared to face-to-face interviewing (FTFI) with open-ended, non-sensitive questions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods11: 280–291.
16.
FinkelhorD.HambyS.OrmrodR.TurnerH. (2005) The juvenile victimization questionnaire: Reliability, validity and national norms. Child Abuse & Neglect29: 383–412. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.11.001.
17.
FriborgO.RosenvingeJ. H. (2013) A comparison of open-ended and closed questions in the prediction of mental health. Quality & Quantity47: 1397–1411.
18.
GarciaJ.EvansJ.ReshawM. (2004) “Is there anything else you would like to tell us” – Methodological issues in the use of free-text comments from postal surveys. Quality and Quantity38: 113–125.
19.
GreenfieldT. K.NayakM. B.BondJ.YeY.MidanikL. T. (2006) Maximum quantity consumed and alcohol-related problems: Assessing the most alcohol drunk with two measures. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research30: 1576–1582.
20.
Helweg-LarsenK.Bøving-LarsenH. (2003) Ethical issues in youth surveys: Potentials for conducting a national questionnaire study on adolescent schoolchildren’s sexual experiences with adults. American Journal of Public Health93: 1878–1882.
21.
JacquesS. (2014) The quantitative–qualitative divide in criminology: A theory of ideas’ importance, attractiveness, and publication. Theoretical Criminology18: 317–334.
22.
JansonS.JernbroC.LångbergB. (2011) Kroppslig bestraffning och annan kränkning av barn I Sverige – en nationell kartläggning [Corporal punishment and other humiliating behavior towards children in Sweden], Stockholm, Sweden: Stiftelsen Allmänna Barnhuset and Karlstad University.
23.
KivivuoriJ. (2011) Discovery of hidden crime: Self-report delinquency surveys in criminal policy context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
ten KleijF.MustersP. A. (2003) Text analysis of open-ended survey responses: A complementary method to preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference14: 43–52.
25.
KrohnM. D.ThornberryT. P.LizotteA. J.BellK. A.PhillipsM. D. (2011) Self-report surveys within longitudinal panel designs. In: GaddD.KarstedtS.MessnerS. F. (eds) The Sage handbook of criminological research methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 23–35.
26.
O’CathainA.ThomasK. J. (2004) Any other comments? Open questions on questionnaires – A bane or a bonus to research. BMC Medical Research Methodology4. . Retrieved from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/4/25.
27.
OngB. N.DunnK. M.CroftP. R. (2006) “Since you’re asking…”: Free text commentaries in an epidemiological study of low back pain consulters in primary care. Quality and Quantity40: 651–659.
28.
PeltonenK.EllonenN.PösöT.LucasS. (2014) Mothers’ self-report violence toward their children: A multifaceted risk analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect38: 1923–1933.
29.
RadfordL.CorralS.BradleyC.FisherH.BassettC.HowatN.CollishawS. (2011) Child abuse and neglect in the UK today, London, UK: NSPCC.
RichardsS. H.CampbellJ. L.WalshawE.DickensA.GrecoM. (2009) A multi-method analysis of free-text comments from the UK General Medical Council Colleague Questionnaires. Medical Education43: 757–766.
32.
RiiskjærE.AmmentorpJ.KofoedP.-E. (2012) The value of open-ended questions in surveys on patient experience: Number of comments and perceived usefulness from a hospital perspective. International Journal for Quality in Health Care24: 509–516.
33.
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.FinkelhorD.MooreD.RunyanD. (1998) Identification of child maltreatment with the parent–child conflict tactics scales: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents. Child Abuse and Neglect22: 249–316.
34.
WoikeB. A. (2009) Content coding of open-ended responses. In: RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KruegerR. F. (eds) Handbook of research methods in personality psychology, New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 292–307.
