The Bhattacharya method was used to calculate reference values from unselected patient data. These values were compared with reference values obtained from data from a blood donor population group following the recommendations of the IFCC. Differences between the results could be attributed in part to different statistical methods, and in part to differences between populations. With some limitations, the Bhattacharya method can be of help in the determination of reference values and quality control.
IFCC. Approved recommendation (1987) on the theory of reference values. Part 2. Selection of individuals for the production of reference values. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem1987; 25: 639–44.
2.
IFCC. Approved recommendation (1987) on the theory of reference values. Part 5. Statistical treatment of collected reference values. Determination of reference limits. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem1987; 25: 645–56.
3.
NausAJM. De berekening van referentiewaarden in de klinische chemie uit analyseresultaten van een patientenpopulatie (in Dutch, summary in English). Thesis, Maastricht, The Netherlands1982.
4.
AmarorEHsiB.Indirect methods for estimating the normal range. Amer J Clin Pathol1969; 52: 538–46.
5.
BestWMasonCBarronSValidation of procedure for setting normal limits on basis of total laboratory experience. Clin Chim Acta1970; 28: 127–32.
6.
NeumannG.The determination of normal ranges from routine laboratory data. Clin Chem1968; 14: 979–88.
7.
BhattacharyaC.A simple method of resolution of a distribution into Gaussian components. Biometrics1967; 23: 115–35.
8.
HoffmannR.Establishing normal ranges (lett-er). Clin Chem1971; 17: 456–7.
9.
PryceJ.Level of haemoglobin in whole blood and red blood cells, and proposed convention for defining normality. Lancet1960; ii: 333–6.
10.
BoydJCLacherDA. A multi-stage Gaussian transformation algorithm for clinical laboratory data. Clin Chem1982; 28: 1735–41.
11.
HarrisEKDeMetsDL. Estimation of normal ranges and cumulative proportions by transforming observed distributions to Gaussian form. Clin Chem1972; 18: 605–12.
12.
JohnJADraperNR. An alternative family of transformations. Appl Statist1980; 29: 190–7.
13.
SavitzkyAGolayM.Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem1964; 36: 1627–38.
14.
BaadenhujsenHSmitJC. Indirect estimation of clinical chemical reference intervals from total hospital patient data: Application of a modified Bhattacharya procedure. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem1985; 23: 829–39.
15.
WinkelP.The use of the subject as his own referent. In: GraesbeckRAlstroemT, eds. Reference Values in Laboratory Medicine. The Current State of ArtChichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1981; 17–23.
16.
WilliamsGZ. The nature and use of individual person's reference limits in clinical chemistry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest1972; 29 (Suppl. 126), 193.
17.
The committee on reference values of the Scandinavian society for clinical chemistry and clinical physiology. Recommendations concerning the collection of reference values in clinical chemistry. Scand J Clin Lab Invest1975; 35 (Suppl. 144).
18.
LeppänenEA. Experimental basis of standardized specimen collection: The effect of short moderate exercise on serum K, Na, ASAT, ALAT, CK and LD. Scand J Clin Lab Invest1989; 49: 287–92.
19.
HemelJBHindriksFRvan der SlikW.Critical discussion on a method for derivation of reference limits in clinical chemistry from a patient population. J Automatic Chem1985; 7: 20–30.
20.
de KievietWSlaatsEHAbelingNGGM. Pediatric reference values for calcium, magnesium and inorganic phosphorus in serum obtained from Bhattacharya plots for data from unselected patients. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem1986; 24: 233–42.
