Interference in immunoassay: An estimate based on “real-world” experience. (Reply)

Abstract

Keywords

Immunoassays Interference False results

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dittadi

. Interferences in immunoassay: an estimate based on ‘real-world’ experience. Ann Clin Biochem 2024; 61: 327–328.

Ismail

AAA

. On the interpretation of affirmative follow-up tests in immunoassays: what must not be done? Ann Clin Biochem 2006; 43: 249–251.

Altman

Bland

. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32: 307–317.

Bland

Altman

. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–310.

Ismail

AAA

Walker

Barth

, et al. Wrong biochemistry results: two case reports and observational study in 5310 patients on potentially misleading thyroid-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin immunoassay results. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 2023–2029.

Mills

Jeffery

Mackenzie

, et al. An immunoglobulin G complexed form of thyroidstimulating hormone (macro thyroid-stimulating hormone) is a cause of elevated serum thyroid-stimulating hormone concentration. Ann Clin Biochem 2013; 50: 416–420.

Sturgeon

Viljoen

. Analytical error and interference in immunoassay: minimizing risk. Ann Clin Biochem 2011; 48: 418–432.

Bjerner

Nustad

Norum

, et al. Immunometric assay interference: incidence and prevention. Clin Chem 2002; 48: 613–621.

Ismail

AAA

. When laboratory tests can mislead even when they appear plausible. Clin Med 2017; 17: 329–332.