Experience with Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy

Abstract

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) has gained popularity among critical care specialists in the past 10 years. The initial studies in our specialty resulted in essentially banning the procedure as a dangerous substitute for standard operative tracheostomy. Despite this action, more than 1,100 cases of percutaneous tracheostomy have been reported with details on complications. We reviewed all published data and studied 311 patients of our own. A prospective study was performed in 3 groups of patients: 1) 50 patients scheduled for PDT performed in the operating room by a head and neck surgeon (group 1); 2) 50 patients who underwent standard operative tracheostomy performed by the same surgeon (group 2); and 3) 211 patients who underwent bedside PDT by critical care physicians (group 3). The intraoperative complication rates were 0% in group 1, 2% in group 2, and 4% in group 3; the postoperative complication rates were 13%, 4%, and 12%, respectively. There were 2 deaths in group 3, and none in groups 1 or 2. The statistically significant differences among the groups were the superiority of group 1 over group 3 in intraoperative complications, as well as the lower postoperative complication rate of the standard tracheostomy group. These results show that PDT can be performed with acceptable morbidity rates in relation to published complication rates of standard tracheostomy, but it has no advantage over standard tracheostomy with respect to postoperative morbidity. When they are performed by a head and neck surgeon, the morbidity associated with both standard and percutaneous tracheostomies can be reduced.