In this study, factors leading to the failure of internal mammary artery grafting was investigated among patients with coronary bypass. In all, 1323 patients were evaluated. It was found that lower grade diameter stenosis in the native vessel during postoperative angiogram and wall motion score index independently affected the fate of internal mammary artery as a graft. Grafting with internal mammary artery to native vessels with lower grade stenosis and to myocardium with poor wall score might not be a rational approach.
BarnerH.B., StandevenJ.W., ReeseJ.Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1985; 90: 668–675.
2.
LoopF.D., LytleB.W., CosgroveD.M., StewartR.W., GoormasticM., WilliamsG.M.Influence of the internal mammary artery graft on 10 year survival and other cardiac events.N Engl J Med.1986; 314: 1.
3.
CosgroveD.M., LoopF.D., SaundersC.L., LytleB.W., KramerJ.R.Should coronary arteries less than fifty percent stenosis be bypassed?J Thorac Cardiovasc Sure.1981; 82: 520.
4.
SekiT., KitamuraS., KawachiK.A quantitative study of postoperative luminal narrowing of the internal thoracic artery graft in coronary artery bypass surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1992; 104: 1532–1538.
SinghR.N., BegB.A., KayE.B.Physiologic adaptability: the secret of success of the internal mammary artery grafts.Ann Thorac Surg.1986; 41: 247–250.
7.
DincerB., BarnerH.B.The occluded internal mammary artery graft: restoration of patency after apparent occlusion associated with progression of coronary disease.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1983; 85: 318–320.
8.
KawasujiM., SakakibaraN., TakemuraH., TedoriyaT., UshijimaT., WatanabeY.Is the internal thoracic artery grafting suitable for a moderately stenotic coronary artery?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.1996; 112: 253–259.
9.
GlazierJ.J., GiriS., PrimianoC.A.Atresia of internal thoracic artery grafts following placement to noncritically obstructed vessels.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.1997; 42: 298–301.
10.
VillarealR.P., MathurV.S.The string phenomenon: an important cause of internal mammary artery graft failure.Tex Heart Inst J.2000; 27: 346–349.
11.
ShimizuT., HirayamaT., SuesadaH., IkedaK., ItoS., IshimaruS.Effect of flow competition on internal thoracic artery graft: postoperative velocimetric and angiographic study.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2000; 120: 459–465.
12.
BarronD.J., LiveseyS.A.Patency of an internal thoracic artery graft despite maximal competitive flow.Ann Thorac Surg.1995; 59: 1556–1557.
13.
BersotT.P., PalaogluK.E., MahleyR.W.Managing dyslipidemia in Turkey: suggested guidelines for a population characterized by low levels of high density lipoprotein cholesterol.Anadolu Kardiyol Derg.2002; 2: 315–322.
YilmazM.B., AkinY., BiyikogluS.F.Fate of internal mammary artery grafted on to totally occluded coronary arteries.Int J Cardiol.2004; 93: 305–306.
16.
ManninenH.I., JaakkolaP., SuhonenM., RehnbergS., VuorenniemiR., MatsiP.J.Angiographic predictors of graft patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial and venous grafts.Ann Thorac Surg.1998; 66: 1289–1294.
17.
FrickM.H., ValleM., HarjolaP.T.Progression of coronary artery disease in randomised medical and surgical patients over a 5-year angiographic follow-up.Am J Cardiol.1983; 52: 681–685.
