School–family collaboration is a key factor in education for sustainability. However, rigorous evaluation of this relationship has been scarcely addressed from an empirical perspective. This study aimed to design and validate a scale to measure school–family collaboration in the field of environmental education. Based on a conceptual review, four key dimensions were defined: strategies and communication, family participation, impact on ecological habits, and implementation barriers. Content validation was conducted using the Delphi method with a panel of 15 experts. The scale was subsequently administered to 531 participants (312 teachers and 219 family members) from educational centers in various regions of Spain. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses confirmed a robust internal structure (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.841; Comparative Fit Index = 0.945; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.062). Internal reliability, assessed through Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, was high (total α = .91), with consistent values across all dimensions (α > .80). The results demonstrate that the scale has structural validity and empirical reliability, making it a useful tool for future research, institutional evaluation processes, and the development of educational policies focused on socio-environmental co-responsibility.
AntúnezS. (2004). Educación y familia: un binomio imprescindible. Education and Family: An Essential Partnership. Gedisa.
2.
BanerjeeA.HornM. S. (2013). Ghost hunter: Parents and children playing together to learn about energy consumption. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (TEI’14) (pp. 267–274). https://tidal.northwestern.edu/media/files/pubs/banerjee-tei14-small.pdf
3.
BanerjeeA.HornM. S.DavisP. (2016). Invasion of the energy monsters: A family board game about energy consumption. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1828–1834). https://tidal.northwestern.edu/media/files/pubs/CHI_EA_CC.pdf
4.
BorsariB.MoraC. (2020). Education reform through a systems approach for sustainable development. In Leal FilhoW.Marisa AzulA.BrandliL.Gökçin ÖzuyarP.WallT. (Eds.), Quality education. Encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals (pp. 1–10). Springer.
5.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
GarretaJ. (2020). Intervención educativa y sostenibilidad [Educational Intervention and Sustainability]. Octaedro.
8.
de España2Gobierno. (2021). Ley 7/2021, de 20 de mayo, de cambio climático y transición energética. Boletín Oficial del Estado, nº 121, 21 de mayo de 2021, pp. 62072–62120. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2021/05/20/7/con
9.
González-MartínezE.HernándezB. R. (2020). Validación de una escala de mediaciones culturales en el contexto de proyectos socioculturales comunitarios [Validation of a scale of cultural mediations in the context of community sociocultural projects]. Sociologias, 22, 194–227. http://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-91231
10.
Herrera-FrancoG.Mora-FrankC.Carrión-MeroP. (2023). Sustainable development in Latin American higher education institutions. In Leal FilhoW.FrankenbergerF.TortatoU. (Eds.), Sustainability in higher education (pp. 93–110). Springer.
11.
HornM. S.DavisP.HubbardA. K.KeifertD.LeongZ. A.OlsonI. C. (2011, June20–23). Learning sustainability: Families, learning, and next-generation eco-feedback technology [Conference session]. Proceedings of IDC 2011—10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/1999030.1999051
12.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
13.
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
14.
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS AMOS for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
KaiserHF. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575
17.
KynigosC.YiannoutsouN. (2018). Children challenging the design of half-baked games: Expressing values through the process of game modding. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 17, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.04.001
18.
Leal FilhoW.TrevisanL. V.DinisM. A. P.UlmerN.PaçoA.BorsariB.SierraJ.SalviaA. (2024). Fostering students’ participation in the implementation of the sustainable development goals at higher education institutions. Discover Sustainability, 5, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00204-7
19.
LiuY. (2023). Research on the collaborative education mechanism of family school cooperation in preschool education. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.25236/ajhss.2023.062410
20.
MaY.MenJ.CuiW. (2020). Does environmental education matter? Evidence from provincial higher education institutions in China. Sustainability, 12(16), Article 6338. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166338
21.
MakrakisV. (2017). Unlocking the potentiality and actuality of ICTs in developing sustainability-justice curricula and society. Knowledge Cultures, 5, 103–122.
MusickG.FreemanG.McNeeseN. J. (2021). Gaming as family time: Digital game co-play in modern parent-child relationships. Proceedings of the ACM on Human- Computer Interaction, 5, Article 251. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474678
24.
NedungadiP.MenonR.GutjahrG.RamanR. (2024). Evaluating holistic education and digital learning model for advancing SDG4: A longitudinal mixed-effects modeling approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2299134. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2299134
25.
Oñate-MartínezN.Ramos-MoralesL.Díaz-ArmesoA. (1988). Utilización del Método Delphi en la pronosticación: Una experiencia inicial [Use of the Delphi Method in Forecasting: An Initial Experience]. Economía Planificada, 3(4), 9–48.
26.
PriatmokoS.SholihahS. (2023). School, parents, and community collaboration in developing student’s environmental awareness. Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education, 7, Article 70. https://doi.org/10.32934/jmie.v7i2.560
27.
PuyueloM. (1989). La relación familia-escuela en la educación ambiental. Revista de Pedagogía, 42(5), 23–39.
28.
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education – All means all. UNESCO. https://gem-report-2020.unesco.org
