This research aims to explore individual-level reactions to protest and counter-protest interactions in Georgia. Since gaining independence, societal polarization has been a defining aspect of Georgian society. While earlier divisions centered around government support, recent issues—such as LGBTQ rights—have intensified both protests and counter-protests. The literature has documented the dynamics of protests and counter-protests in various contexts, highlighting their impact on each other and on public discourse. However, the influence of these dynamics on public support—particularly through the lens of emotional and cognitive shifts—remains relatively unexplored, especially in the Georgian context. Based on 66 in-depth interviews, this article examines how the dynamics of protests and counter-protests affect bystanders’ perceptions. Three narratives of judgment were identified to depict sequences capturing the development of these attitudes. These narratives reflect shared emotional tones that shape the trajectories of individual perceptions. This research contributes to the literature on social movements by demonstrating that the presence of counter-protests can fundamentally alter the emotional landscape and cognitive (moral) judgments of bystanders. It also details the argumentative basis of such changes. Furthermore, it extends the theoretical framework of protest–counter-protest dynamics by showing how these interactions create new emotional fields for identity alignment and public discourse in polarized societies.
De WaalT. (2010). The Caucasus: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
14.
della PortaD. (2014). Methodological practices in social movement research. Oxford University Press.
15.
EngelsteinL. (1995). Soviet policy toward male homosexuality: Its origins and historical roots. Journal of Homosexuality, 29(2–3), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v29n02_06
16.
EnnisJ. G. (1987). Fields of action: Movements, change, and the politics of reform. Routledge.
17.
EsacoveA. (2004). Dialogic framing: The framing/counterframing of “partial-birth” abortion. Sociological Inquiry, 74(1), 70–101.
18.
Eslen-ZiyaH.McGarryA.JenzenO.ErhartI.KorkutU. (2019). From anger to solidarity: The emotional echo-chamber of Gezi Park protests. Emotion, Space and Society, 33, 100632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2019.100632
19.
Fredriksen-GoldsenK.MonroS., & International LGBTQ+ Public Acceptance Index Research Team. (2021, November). Global Acceptance Index: LGBTI acceptance worldwide—Findings from 175 countries (Williams Institute Research Report). The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law.
20.
GallagherS.McCammonH. J.SmithC. (2016). Social movement strategies: Framing and counterframing the narrative. Social Problems, 63(3), 302–318.
GiorgiS. (2017). The mind and heart of resonance: The role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 711–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12278
24.
GoodwinJ.JasperJ. M. (2006). Emotions and social movements. In StetsJ. E.TurnerJ. H. (Eds.), Handbooks of sociology and social research (pp. 611–635). Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
25.
GoodwinJ.JasperJ. M.PollettaF. (2001). Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. University of Chicago Press.
26.
GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. Sage Publications.
27.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.
28.
HaunssS.DaphiP.UbaK. (2025). Counter-protests with and without counter-movements. American Behavioral Scientist (this issue).
29.
HealeyD. (2002). Homosexual Existence and Existing Socialism: New Light on the Repression of Male Homosexuality in Stalin’s Russia. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 8(3), 349–378.
30.
HenninkM.HutterI.BaileyA. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage.
IsaakyanI. (2013). Reintegration practices in post-Soviet states. Global Governance Programme, Cultural Pluralism. https://hdl.handle.net/1814/29929
35.
JasperJ. M. (1998). The emotions of protest: Affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements. Sociological Forum, 13, 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022175308081
36.
JasperJ. M. (2014). Protest: A cultural introduction to social movements. Polity Press.
37.
JasperJ. M. (2018). The emotions of protest. University of Chicago Press.
38.
KarakashyanK. (2020). Positive media representation of the Bulgarian LGBTQ+ community and shifting national attitudes towards homosexuality [Master’s thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki]. Global Campus Open Knowledge Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11825/1822
39.
KlandermansB. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. Blackwell.
40.
KuckartzU. (2014). Qualitative text analysis. Sage.
41.
KuckartzU.RadikerS. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA. Springer.
Legislative Herald of Georgia. (2014). Anti-discrimination law of Georgia. https://matsne.gov.ge
44.
MarcusG. E.NeumanW. R.MacKuenM. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. University of Chicago Press.
45.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464
46.
McCluskeyM. (2017). Media and political protest: Mobilization and demobilization. Journal of Media and Communication, 8(1), 99–117.
47.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499–522.
48.
MeyerD. S.StaggenborgS. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628–1660.
49.
MutzD. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Reynolds-StensonH.EarlJ. (2018). Protest event analysis and the study of counterprotests: Toward an integrated approach. Social Movement Studies, 17(1), 1–18.
55.
RocchettiD.PilatiK. (2025). Dynamics of protests and counterprotests around far-right politics. American Behavioral Scientist (this issue).
56.
RohlingerD. A. (2002). Framing the abortion debate: Organizational resources, media strategies, and movement-countermovement dynamics. Sociological Quarterly, 43(4), 479–507.
57.
RutlandP. (2023). Thirty years of nation-building in the post-Soviet states. Nationalities Papers, 51(1), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.94
ShahinS. (2023). Affective polarization of a protest and a counterprotest: Million MAGA March v. Million Moron March. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(6), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221091212
StrykerS.StathamA. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. I, 3rd ed., pp. 311–378). Random House.
65.
TarrowS. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
66.
TillyC. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Addison-Wesley.
67.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A study of individual, group, and collective action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 198–218.
68.
VerkuytenM.AdelmanL.YogeeswaranK. (2022). Intolerance of transgressive protest actions: The Differential roles of deontological and utilitarian morality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(8), 1184–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221099709
69.
WheatleyJ. (2005). Georgia from national awakening to Rose Revolution: Delayed transition in the former Soviet Union. Ashgate Publishing.
70.
WiedlackK. (2017). Gays vs. Russia: Media representations, vulnerable bodies and the construction of a (post)modern West. European Journal of English Studies, 21(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2017.1369271
71.
WilkinsonC. (2019). LGBT rights in the former Soviet Union: The evolution of hypervisibility. In BosiaM. J.McEvoyS. M.RahmanM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of global LGBT and sexual diversity politics (pp. 233–248). Oxford University Press.
