The National Collegiate Athletic Association authorized Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) beginning July 2021 allowing collegiate athletes to monetize their brand. The main channel athletes can monetize their brand is through social media as they do not have access to mass media or marketing consultants. This article examines gender differences in social media presence and its impact on NIL monetization. We find that athletes’ NIL value is positively related to the number of followers on Instagram and Twitter (now X). However, we find gender asymmetries with female athletes receiving a premium for Twitter followers and a discount for Instagram followers. Other results suggest that NIL values are positively associated with the level of competition and the major money sports of football and basketball.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789–865. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20160995
2.
CoccoA. R.KunkelT.BakerB. J. (2023). The influence of personal branding and institutional factors on the name, image, and likeness value of collegiate athletes’ social media posts. Journal of Sport Management, 37(5), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2022-0155
3.
CoccoA. R.MoormanA. M. (2022). Untapped potential: An examination of name, image, and likeness earnings estimates for community college athletes. Journal of Issues in Intercollegiate Athletics, 15(1), 256–271.
4.
CookyC.MessnerM. A.MustoM. (2015). “It’s dude time!” A quarter century of excluding women’s sports in televised news and highlight shows. Communication & Sport, 3(3), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479515588761
JessopA.SabinJ. (2021). The sky is not falling: Why name, image, and likeness legislation does not violate Title IX and could narrow the publicity gap between men’s sport and women’s sport athletes. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 31, 253–288.
10.
KunkelT.BakerB. J.BakerT. A.IIIDoyleJ. P. (2021). There is no nil in NIL: Examining the social media value of student-athletes’ names, images, and likeness. Sport Management Review, 24(5), 839–861.
11.
LeRoyM. (2022). Reimagining college athletes as employees. Perspectives on Work, 26, 38–42.
12.
LobpriesJ.BennettG.BrisonN. (2018). How I perform is not enough: Exploring branding barriers faced by elite female athletes. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 27(1), 5–17.
13.
LüdeckeD. (2018). Ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(26), 772. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772
14.
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alson. (2021) 594 U.S. 20-512.
SalagaS.BrisonN.CooperJ.RascherD.SchwarzA. (2023). Special issue introduction: Name, image, and likeness and the National Collegiate Athletic Association. Journal of Sport Management, 37(5), 305–306. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2023-0168
