Ideological Identification,Type of Threat,and Differences in How Anger and Fear Relate to Anti-Immigrant and Populist Attitudes

Abstract

Following calls for a clear analytical distinction between populism and the specific ideological projects to which it is attached, the present article examines how populist and anti-immigrant attitudes relate to feelings of fear and anger about perceived threats facing the country. It posits that, although the association of these two discrete negative emotions with anti-immigration attitudes should be related to individuals’ ideological identification and the type of threat, populist attitudes, by virtue of their ubiquitous character, should be strongly associated with feelings of anger regardless of ideology or threat type. Drawing on data from an online survey in Spain, I find that anti-immigration attitudes are associated with anger among right-wing individuals and with fear among those on the center and the left, and more strongly associated with emotions linked to cultural threats. By contrast, results indicate that populist attitudes go hand in hand with feelings of anger across ideological groups and type of threat.

Keywords

populism nativism emotions ideology threat Spain

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadi

Bertlich

Duyvendak

J. W.

Fischer

(2025). Populism versus nativism: Socio-economic, socio-cultural and emotional predictors. American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test,” Part One, 69(4), 423–453.

Adorno

T. W.

Frenkel-Brunswik

Levinson

D. J.

Sanford

(1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper & Brothers.

Albertson

Gadarian

S. K.

(2015). Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge University Press.

Arzheimer

(2018). Explaining electoral support for the radical right. In Rydgren

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the radical right (pp. 216–246). Oxford University Press.

Banks

A. J.

(2014). The public’s anger: White racial attitudes and opinions toward health care reform. Political Behavior, 36(3), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9251-3

Banks

A. J.

(2016). Are group cues necessary? How anger makes ethnocentrism among whites a stronger predictor of racial and immigration policy opinions. Political Behavior, 38(3), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9330-3

Banks

A. J.

Valentino

N. A.

(2012). Emotional substrates of white racial attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00561.x

Bonikowski

Zhang

(2023). Populism as dog-whistle politics: Anti-elite discourse and sentiments toward minority groups. Social Forces, 102(1), 180–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soac147

Brambor

Clark

W. R.

Golder

(2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.

10.

Brandt

M. J.

Sibley

C. G.

Osborne

(2019). What is central to political belief system networks? Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(9), 1352–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218824354

11.

Brandt

M. J.

Turner-Zwinkels

F. M.

Karapirinler

Van Leeuwen

Bender

van Osch

Adams

(2021). The association between threat and politics depends on the type of threat, the political domain, and the country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 324–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220946187

12.

Busby

E. C.

Gubler

J. R.

Hawkins

K. A.

(2019). Framing and blame attribution in populist rhetoric. Journal of Politics, 81(2), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1086/701832

13.

Carver

C. S.

Harmon-Jones

(2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965

14.

Castanho Silva

Andreadis

Anduiza

Blanuša

Corti

Y. M.

Delfino

Rico

Ruth

Spruyt

Steenbergen

Littvay

(2019). Public opinion surveys: A new scale. In Hawkins

K. A.

Carlin

Littvay

Rovira Kaltwasser

(Eds.), The ideational approach to populism: Theory, method and analysis. Routledge.

15.

Ceobanu

A. M.

Escandell

(2010). Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102651

16.

Cleen

B. D.

Stavrakakis

(2017). Distinctions and articulations: A discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and nationalism. Javnost—The Public, 24(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083

17.

Eadeh

F. R.

Chang

K. K.

(2020). Can threat increase support for liberalism? New insights into the relationship between threat and political attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618815919

18.

Ellis

Stimson

J. A.

(2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge University Press.

19.

Erisen

(2025). Emotional predictors of populism in the case of Turkey. American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test,” Part Three, 69(14), 1687–1710.

20.

Filsinger

(2025). How anger shapes the relationship between social isolation and populist attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test,” Part Two, 69(5), 583–603.

21.

Font

Graziano

Tsakatika

(2021). Varieties of inclusionary populism? SYRIZA, Podemos and the five star movement. Government and Opposition, 56(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.17

22.

Fraile

Hernández

(2020). Determinants of voting behaviour. In Muro

Lago

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Spanish politics (pp. 372–388). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198826934.013.22

23.

Gaffney

A. M.

Hackett

J. D.

Rast

D. E.

Hohman

Z. P.

Jaurique

(2018). The state of American protest: Shared anger and populism. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 18(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12145

24.

Grande

Schwarzbözl

Fatke

(2019). Politicizing immigration in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1444–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1531909

25.

Gunther

Montero

J. R.

(2001). The anchors of partisanship: A comparative analysis of voting behavior in four Southern European democracies. In Diamandouros

Gunther

(Eds.), Parties, politics, and democracy in the new Southern Europe (pp. 83–152). Johns Hopkins University Press.

26.

Hameleers

Bos

de Vreese

C. H.

(2017). “They did it”: The effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Communication Research, 44(6), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216644026

27.

Hawkins

K. A.

(2009). Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721

28.

Hawkins

K. A.

Littvay

(2019). Contemporary US populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108644655

29.

Huddy

Feldman

Cassese

(2007). On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In Neuman

W. R.

Marcus

G. E.

Crigler

A. N.

MacKuen

(Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 202–230). University of Chicago Press.

30.

Huddy

Feldman

Taber

Lahav

(2005). Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00144.x

31.

Ivarsflaten

(2008). What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies, 41(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006294168

32.

Jost

J. T.

Federico

C. M.

Napier

J. L.

(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600

33.

Jost

J. T.

Stern

Rule

N. O.

Sterling

(2017). The politics of fear: Is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? Social Cognition, 35(4), 324–353. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.4.324

34.

Laclau

(2005). Populism: What’s in a name? In Panizza

(Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 32–49). Verso.

35.

Lambert

A. J.

Eadeh

F. R.

Hanson

E. J.

(2019). Anger and its consequences for judgment and behavior: Recent developments in social and political psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 103–173.

36.

Lambert

A. J.

Scherer

L. D.

Schott

J. P.

Olson

K. R.

Andrews

R. K.

O’Brien

T. C.

Zisser

A. R.

(2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: An integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 886–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019086

37.

Lazarus

R. S.

(1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.

38.

Lerner

J. S.

Gonzalez

R. M.

Small

D. A.

Fischhoff

(2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01433

39.

Lerner

J. S.

Keltner

(2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159.

40.

Lindholm

Lutz

Green

E. G. T.

(2025). Life dissatisfaction and the right-wing populist vote. Evidence from the European Social Survey. American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test,” Part Two, 69(5), 604–624.

41.

Lucassen

Lubbers

(2012). Who fears what? Explaining far-right-wing preference in Europe by distinguishing perceived cultural and economic ethnic threats. Comparative Political Studies, 45(5), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011427851

42.

Mackie

D. M.

Devos

Smith

E. R.

(2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602

43.

MacKuen

Wolak

Keele

Marcus

G. E.

(2010). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x

44.

Marcus

G. E.

(2021). The rise of populism: The politics of justice, anger, and grievance. In Forgas

J. P.

Crano

W. D.

Fiedler

(Eds.), The psychology of populism: The tribal challenge to liberal democracy. Routledge.

45.

Marcus

G. E.

Neuman

W. R.

MacKuen

(2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. University of Chicago Press.

46.

Marcus

G. E.

Valentino

N. A.

Vasilopoulos

Foucault

(2019). Applying the theory of affective intelligence to support for authoritarian policies and parties. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12571

47.

Mendes

M. S.

Dennison

(2021). Explaining the emergence of the radical right in Spain and Portugal: Salience, stigma and supply. West European Politics, 44(4), 752–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1777504

48.

Mudde

(2004). The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 542–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

49.

Mudde

(2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.

50.

Mudde

Rovira Kaltwasser

(2013). Exclusionary versus inclusionary populism: Comparing the contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government & Opposition, 48(2), 147–174.

51.

Panizza

(2005). Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy. In Panizza

(Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 1–31). Verso.

52.

Rico

Guinjoan

Anduiza

(2017). The emotional underpinnings of populism: How anger and fear affect populist attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12261

53.

Rico

Guinjoan

Anduiza

(2020). Empowered and enraged: Political efficacy, anger and support for populism in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 59(4), 797–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12374

54.

Rooduijn

(2019). State of the field: How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12314

55.

Roseman

I. J.

(1996). Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory. Cognition and Emotion, 10(3), 241–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999396380240

56.

Rydgren

(2007). The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131752

57.

Rydgren

(2017). Radical right-wing parties in Europe. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17024.ryd

58.

Schmuck

Matthes

(2017). Effects of economic and symbolic threat appeals in right-wing populist advertising on anti-immigrant attitudes: The impact of textual and visual appeals. Political Communication, 34(4), 607–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1316807

59.

Sears

D. O.

(1993). Symbolic politics: A socio-psychological theory. In Iyengar

McGuire

W. J.

(Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 113–149). Duke University Press.

60.

Seeberg

H. B.

(2017). How stable is political parties’ issue ownership? A cross-time, cross-national analysis. Political Studies, 65(2), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716650224

61.

Skitka

L. J.

Bauman

C. W.

Aramovich

N. P.

Morgan

G. S.

(2006). Confrontational and preventative policy responses to terrorism: Anger wants a fight and fear wants “them” to go away. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2804_11

62.

Smith

C. A.

Ellsworth

P. C.

(1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838.

63.

Stavrakakis

(2017). Discourse theory in populism research: Three challenges and a dilemma. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17025.sta

64.

Stavrakakis

Katsambekis

Nikisianis

Kioupkiolis

Siomos

(2017). Extreme right-wing populism in Europe: Revisiting a reified association. Critical Discourse Studies, 14(4), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325

65.

Stephan

W. G.

Ybarra

Morrison

K. R.

(2009). Intergroup threat theory. In Nelson

T. D.

(Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 43–60). Psychology Press.

66.

Suhay

Erisen

(2018). The role of anger in the biased assimilation of political information. Political Psychology, 39(4), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12463

67.

Tiedens

L. Z.

Linton

(2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973.

68.

Turnbull-Dugarte

S. J.

(2019). Explaining the end of Spanish exceptionalism and electoral support for Vox. Research & Politics, 6(2), 2053168019851680. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019851680

69.

Valentino

N. A.

Hutchings

V. L.

Banks

A. J.

Davis

A. K.

(2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the Internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273.

70.

Vasilopoulos

Marcus

G. E.

Foucault

(2018). Emotional responses to the Charlie Hebdo attacks: Addressing the authoritarianism puzzle. Political Psychology, 39(3), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12439

71.

Vasilopoulos

Marcus

G. E.

Valentino

N. A.

Foucault

(2019). Fear, anger, and voting for the far right: Evidence from the November 13, 2015 Paris terror attacks. Political Psychology, 40(4), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12513

72.

Vasilopoulou

Halikiopoulou

Exadaktylos

(2014). Greece in crisis: Austerity, populism and the politics of blame. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12093

73.

Verbalyte

Bonansinga

Capelos

(2025). Introduction to the Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test.” American Behavioral Scientist, Triple Special Issue “The Emotional Side of Populist Support: Key Affective Mechanisms at Test,” Part One, 69(4), 403–422.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.04 MB