Sporting contests are designed to elicit an effort from contestants. Well-designed contests have beneficial behavioral responses of competitors such as increased effort which results in higher quality of competition. However, poorly designed contests may not reward the best competitor or may elicit unethical behaviors. This article reviews the literature on sporting contest design, paying particular attention to empirical studies over the last 20 years. Topic areas include different contest designs in a single sport, scheduling of contests and individual games, contest rule changes and game rule changes, and unintended behavioral consequences of sporting contest design.
ApesteguiaJ.Palacios-HuertaI. (2010). Psychological pressure in competitive environments: Evidence from a randomized natural experiment. The American Economic Review, 100(5), 2548–2564.
2.
BernhardtD.HestonS. (2010). Point shaving in college basketball: A cautionary tale for forensic economics. Economic Inquiry, 48(1), 14–25.
3.
BorlandJ.ChicuM.MacdonaldR. D. (2009). Do teams always lose to win? Performance incentives and the player draft in the Australian Football League. Journal of Sports Economics, 10(5), 451–484.
4.
BoudreauJ.EhrlichJ.RazaM. F.SandersS. (2018). The likelihood of social choice violations in rank sum scoring: Algorithms and evidence from NCAA cross country running. Public Choice, 174(3–4), 219–238.
5.
BoudreauJ. W.SandersS. (2015). Choosing “Flawed” aggregation rules: The benefit of social choice violations in a league that values competitive balance. Economics Letters, 137, 106–108.
6.
ChanH. F.SavageD. A.TorglerB. (2019). There and back again: Adaptation after repeated rule changes of the game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75(Part B), 102129.
7.
Cohen-ZadaD.KrumerA.ShapirO. M. (2018). Testing the effect of serve order in tennis tiebreak. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 146, 106–115.
8.
DilgerA.GeyerH. (2009). Are three points for a win really better than two? A comparison of German soccer league and cup games. Journal of Sports Economics, 10(3), 305–318.
9.
DugganM.LevittS. D. (2002). Winning isn’t everything: Corruption in sumo wrestling. The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1594–1605.
10.
ElaadG.KrumerA.KantorJ. (2018). Corruption and sensitive soccer games: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 34(3), 364–394.
FornwagnerH. (2019). Incentives to lose revisited: The NHL and its tournament incentives. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75(Part B), 102088.
13.
GarmonC. (2013). Major League Baseball’s first year player draft: A natural laboratory for the study of bargaining. Journal of Sports Economics, 14(5), 451–478.
14.
GreenC.LozanoF.SimmonsR. (2015). Rank-order tournaments, probability of winning and investing in talent: Evidence from Champions’ League qualifying rules. National Institute Economic Review, 232, R30–R40.
15.
HammondT. H. (2007). Rank injustice? How the scoring method for cross-country running competitions violates major social choice principles. Public Choice, 133(3/4), 359–375.
16.
HarbaughR.KlumppT. (2005). Early round upsets and championship blowouts. Economic Inquiry, 43(2), 316–329.
17.
HillB. (2014). The heat is on: Tournament structure, peer effects, and performance. Journal of Sports Economics, 15(4), 315–337.
18.
HoganV.MasseyP. (2018). Competitive balance: Results of a natural experiment from rugby union. International Journal of Sport Finance, 13(1), 3–17.
19.
HoganV.MasseyP. (2017). Team responses to changed incentives: Evidence from rugby’s six nations championship. International Journal of Sport Finance, 12(2), 140–159.
20.
HonL. Y.ParinduriR. A. (2016). Does the three-point rule make soccer more exciting? Evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Journal of Sports Economics, 17(4), 377–395.
21.
HuthC. (2016). How to design a sports league in golf: Stakeholder-oriented empirical evidence from the German golf league. International Journal of Golf Science, 5(1), 1–25.
22.
HuthC. (2018). League design and sporting challenge as factors in amateur golf players’ satisfaction: Evidence from a survey of the German golf league. German Journal of Exercise & Sport Research, 48(1), 69–78.
23.
LahvickaJ. (2015). The impact of playoffs on seasonal uncertainty in the Czech ice hockey Extraliga. Journal of Sports Economics, 16(7), 784–801.
24.
LarsonD. J.MaxcyJ. (2014). Uncertainty of outcome and radio policy in professional road cycling. Journal of Sport Management, 28(3), 311–323.
25.
LazearE. P. (1995). Personnel economics. MIT Press.
26.
LentenL. J. A.WinchesterN. (2015). Secondary behavioral incentives: Bonus points and rugby professionals. Economic Record, 91(294), 386–398.
27.
Maria RayaJ. (2015). The effect of strategic resting in professional cycling: Evidence from the Tour de France and the Vuelta a España. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(3), 323–342.
28.
MaluegD. A.YatesA. J. (2010). Testing contest theory: Evidence from best-of-three tennis matches. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3), 689–692.
29.
MaxcyJ. G. (2009). Progressive revenue sharing in major league baseball: The effect on player transfers and talent distribution. Review of Industrial Organization, 35(3), 275–297.
30.
MedcalfeS. K.NdhlovuP.ThompsonM. A. (2020). Competitive balance in women’s collegiate cross country running. Applied Economics Letters, 27(3), 174–177.
31.
MedcalfeS. (2009). Incentives and league structure in minor league baseball. Journal of Sport Management, 23(2), 119–141.
32.
MoffatJ. (2020). The impact of participation in pan-European competition on domestic performance in association football. European Sport Management Quarterly, 20(4), 440–457.
33.
MoschiniG. (2010). Incentives and outcomes in a strategic setting: The 3-points-for-a-win system in soccer. Economic Inquiry, 48(1), 65–79.
34.
NormanJ. M. (2015). Is the World Professional Snooker Championship fair?The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(4), 705–706.
35.
NguyenQ.ButlerH.MatthewsG. J. (2022). An examination of Olympic sport climbing competition format and scoring system. Journal of Data Science, 20(2), 156–167.
36.
OzbeklikS.SmithJ. K. (2017). Risk taking in competition: Evidence from match play golf tournaments. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 506–523.
37.
PinaG. (2019). Task scheduling and performance: Evidence from professional surf tournaments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 75(Part B), 102097.
38.
PutermanM.WangQ. (2011). Optimal dynamic clustering through relegation and promotion: How to design a competitive sports league. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 7(2), 1325.
39.
RadomanM. (2017). Labor market implications of institutional changes in European Football: The Bosman ruling and its effect on productivity and career duration of players. Journal of Sports Economics, 18(7), 651–672.
40.
RadomanM.VoiaM. C. (2022). Internal promotion and the Bosman ruling: Evidence from the English Premier League. LABOUR: Review of Labour Economics & Industrial Relations, 36(4), 445–470.
41.
SchokkaertJ.SwinnenJ. (2016). Uncertainty of outcome is higher in the champions league than in the European cup. Journal of Sports Economics, 17(2), 115–147.
42.
ScoppaV. (2015). Fatigue and team performance in soccer: Evidence from the FIFA World Cup and the UEFA European Championship. Journal of Sports Economics, 16(5), 482–507.
43.
SzymanskiS. (2003). The economic design of sporting contests. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1137–1187.
44.
TaylorB. A.TrogdonJ. G. (2002). Losing to win: Tournament incentives in the National Basketball Association. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(1), 23–41.
45.
Triguero-RuizF.Avila-CanoA. (2022). On competitive balance in the group stage of the UEFA Champions League. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 70(3), 231–248.
