The first goal of this study is to examine the capacity of prominent survey-based effort proxies to predict real effort provision in children. Do children who “talk the talk” of hard work also “walk the walk” and make costly effort investments? The second goal is to assess how objective and subjective effort measures are related under two conditions: intrinsic (nonincentivized) motivation and extrinsic (incentivized) motivation. We measure objective “real” effort using three tasks and subjective self-reported effort using four psychological characteristics (conscientiousness, need for cognition, locus of control and delay of gratification) to understand to what extent material incentives affect the cognitive effort of children with different self-reported personalities. Data stem from real-effort experiments carried out with 420 fifth grade students from primary schools in Madrid, Spain. We find that some of the subjective and objective effort measures are positively correlated. Yet the power of personality to predict real effort is only moderate, but greater and more so in the extrinsic than the intrinsic motivation condition. In particular, need for cognition and conscientiousness are the most relevant correlates of objective effort. Overall, we find there is a big difference between saying and doing when it comes to exerting effort, and this difference is even larger when there are no direct material incentives in place to reward effort provision.
AraujoF. A.CarboneE.Conell-PriceL.DunietzM. W.JaroszewiczA.LandsmanR.LaméD.VesterlundL.WangS. W.WilsonA. J. (2016). The slider task: An example of restricted inference on incentive effects. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-016-0025-7
2.
BeißertH.KöhlerM.RempelM.BeierleinC. (2014). Eine deutschsprachige Kurzskala zur Messung des Konstrukts Need for Cognition [A German short-scale for measuring the construct need for cognition] (GESIS-Working Papers No. 32). https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-403157
BickelW. K.PitcockJ. A.YiR.AngtuacoE. J. C. (2009). Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: Fictive and real money gains and losses. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(27), 8839-8846. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5319-08.2009
5.
BlossfeldH.-P.RoßbachH.-G. (Eds.). (2019). Education as a lifelong process: The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (Vol. 3). Springer VS.
6.
BorghansL.GolsteynB. H. H.HeckmanJ. J.HumphriesJ. E. (2016). What grades and achievement tests measure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(47), 13354-13359. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601135113
BuchananT. (2016). Self-report measures of executive function problems correlate with personality, not performance-based executive function measures, in nonclinical samples. Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 372-385. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000192
CassarL.MeierS. (2018). Nonmonetary incentives and the implications of work as a source of meaning. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(3), 215-238. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.3.215
12.
CespónJ.Galdo-ÁlvarezS.DíazF. (2016). Cognitive control activity is modulated by the magnitude of interference and pre-activation of monitoring mechanisms. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39595
13.
CharnessG.GneezyU.HendersonA. (2018). Experimental methods: Measuring effort in economics experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 149(May), 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.024
14.
CorgnetB.Hernán-GonzálezR.SchniterE. (2015). Why real leisure really matters: Incentive effects on real effort in the laboratory. Experimental Economics, 18(2), 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-014-9401-4
15.
CubelM.Nuevo-ChiqueroA.Sanchez-PagesS.Vidal-FernandezM. (2016). Do personality traits affect productivity? Evidence from the laboratory. Economic Journal, 126(592), 654-681. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12373
16.
DeclerckC. H.BooneC.De BrabanderB. (2006). On feeling in control: A biological theory for individual differences in control perception. Brain and Cognition, 62(2), 143-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2006.04.004
17.
DellavignaS.PopeD. (2018). What motivates effort? Evidence and expert forecasts. Review of Economic Studies, 85(2), 1029-1069. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx033
18.
DemelS.BarrA.MillerL.UbedaP. (2019). Commitment to political ideology is a luxury only students can afford: A distributive justice experiment. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 6(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2018.14
19.
DorenC.GrodskyE. (2016). What skills can buy: Transmission of advantage through cognitive and noncognitive skills. Sociology of Education, 89(4), 321-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040716667994
20.
DuckworthA. L.KernM. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(3), 259-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.004
21.
DuckworthA. L.TaxerJ. L.Eskreis-WinklerL.GallaB. M.GrossJ. J. (2019). Self-control and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 373-399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230
22.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA.CorleyR. P.YoungS. E.DeFriesJ. C.HewittJ. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x
23.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA.YoungS. E.DeFriesJ. C.CorleyR. P.HewittJ. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.201
24.
GillD.ProwseV. (2012). A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. American Economic Review, 102(1), 469-503. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.469
25.
GoergS. J.KubeS.RadbruchJ. (2019). The effectiveness of incentive schemes in the presence of implicit effort costs. Management Science, 65(9), 4063-4078. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3160
26.
GonthierC.MacnamaraB. N.ChowM.ConwayA. R. A.BraverT. S. (2016). Inducing proactive control shifts in the AX-CPT. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1882. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01822
27.
HsinA.XieY. (2017). Life-course changes in the mediation of cognitive and non-cognitive skills for parental effects on children’s academic achievement. Social Science Research, 63(March), 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.09.012
28.
InzlichtM.ShenhavA.OlivolaC. Y. (2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007
29.
JakobyN.JacobR. (1999). Messung von internen und externen Kontrollüberzeugungen in allgemeinen Bevölkerungsumfragen [Measurement of internal and external locus of control in general population surveys]. ZUMA Nachrichten, 23(45), 61-71. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-208124
30.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114-158). The Guilford Press.
31.
JudgeT. A.ErezA.BonoJ. E.ThoresenC. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 693-710. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693
32.
KautzT.HeckmanJ. J.DirisR.WeelB. T.BorghansL. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills: Improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success (OECD Education Working Papers No. 110). https://www.nber.org/papers/w20749
33.
KellerU.StrobelA.WollschlägerR.GreiffS.MartinR.VainikainenM.-P.PreckelF. (2019). A need for cognition scale for children and adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(1), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000370
LechnerC. M.DannerD.RammstedtB. (2019). Grit (effortful persistence) can be measured with a short scale, shows little variation across socio-demographic subgroups, and is associated with career success and career engagement. PLOS ONE, 14(11), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224814
36.
MackiewiczM.CieciuchJ. (2016). Pictorial Personality Traits Questionnaire for Children (PPTQ-C): A new measure of children’s personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00498
37.
MalanchiniM.EngelhardtL. E.GrotzingerA. D.HardenK. P.Tucker-DrobE. M. (2019). “Same but different”: Associations between multiple aspects of self-regulation, cognition, and academic abilities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(6), 1164-1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000224
38.
MijsJ. J. B. (2019). The paradox of inequality: Income inequality and belief in meritocracy go hand in hand. Socio-Economic Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy051
39.
MischelW.EbbesenE. B.Raskoff ZeissA. (1972). Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(2), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032198
40.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
41.
MoffittT. E.ArseneaultL.BelskyD.DicksonN.HancoxR. J.HarringtonH. L.HoutsR.PoultonR.RobertsB. W.RossS.SearsM. R.ThomsonM.CaspiA. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(7), 2693-2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108
42.
MuirA. M.CarbineK. A.GoodwinJ.Hedges-MuncyA.EndrassT.LarsonM. J. (2019). Differentiating electrophysiological indices of internal and external performance monitoring: Relationship with perfectionism and locus of control. PLoS ONE, 14(10), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219883
43.
MuraskoJ. E. (2007). A lifecourse study on education and health: The relationship between childhood psychosocial resources and outcomes in adolescence and young adulthood. Social Science Research, 36(4), 1348-1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.01.001
44.
PaasF.TuovinenJ. E.TabbersH.Van GervenP. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
RimfeldK.KovasY.DaleP. S.PlominR. (2016). True grit and genetics: Predicting academic achievement from personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 780-789. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000089
47.
RobertsB. W.KuncelN. R.ShinerR.CaspiA.GoldbergL. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
48.
RotterJ. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45(4), 489-493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.4.489
49.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
50.
SandraD. A.OttoA. R. (2018). Cognitive capacity limitations and need for cognition differentially predict reward-induced cognitive effort expenditure. Cognition, 172(March), 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.004
51.
SchmittH.FerdinandN. K.KrayJ. (2015). The influence of monetary incentives on context processing in younger and older adults: An event-related potential study. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 416-434. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0335-x
52.
SegalC. (2012). Working when no one is watching: Motivation, test scores, and economic success. Management Science, 58(8), 1438-1457. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1509
53.
SutterM.ZollerC.Glätzle-RützlerD. (2019). Economic behavior of children and adolescents: A first survey of experimental economics results. European Economic Review, 111(January), 98-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.09.004
54.
UnsworthN.MillerJ. D.LakeyC. E.YoungD. L.MeeksJ. T.CampbellW. K.GoodieA. S. (2009). Exploring the relations among executive functions, fluid intelligence, and personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(4), 194-200. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.4.194
55.
Van SteenbergenH.BandG. P. H.HommelB. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict adaptation: Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1473-1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02470.x
56.
WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.QuanH. (2018). Revisiting the marshmallow test: A conceptual replication investigating links between early delay of gratification and later outcomes. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1159-1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618761661
57.
WestbrookA.BraverT. S. (2015). Cognitive effort: A neuroeconomic approach. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 395-415. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-015-0334-y
58.
WilloughbyM. T.BlairC. B.WirthR. J.GreenbergM. (2010). The measurement of executive function at age 3 years: Psychometric properties and criterion validity of a new battery of tasks. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 306-317. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018708
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
