This paper examines and compares the funding distribution inequities in arts organizations across three different funding institutions—government grantmaking, charitable contributions, and crowdfunding—through different inequity measures. Based on three different datasets including the National Endowment for the Arts grants data, National Center for Charitable Statistics data, and Kickstarter crowdfunding data starting in 2009, we find that compared to non-arts funds on the same platforms, arts-related funds in these institutions are not more concentrated in the hands of a few, although the level of concentration is strikingly high. In addition, we find that nonprofit contributions are heavily concentrated, far more than government grants. However, contributions to arts nonprofits are not more concentrated than to other nonprofits. We also explore how the pandemic crisis impacted arts funding distributions.
BorgonoviF.O’HareM. (2004). The impact of the national endowment for the arts in the United States: Institutional and sectoral effects on private funding. Journal of Cultural Economics, 28(1), 21–36.
3.
BourdieuP. (1993). The field of cultural production. Colombia University Press.
4.
BourdieuP. (1996). The rules of art. Stanford University Press.
5.
BrabhamD. C. (2017). How crowdfunding discourse threatens public arts. New Media & Society, 19(7), 983–999.
6.
BreznitzS. M.NoonanD. S. (2020). Crowdfunding in a not-so-flat world. Journal of Economic Geography, 20(4), 1069–1092.
7.
ChenW. D. (2023). Crowdfunding: Different types of legitimacy. Small Business Economics, 60(1), 245–263.
8.
ErtugG.YogevT.LeeY. G.HedströmP. (2016). The art of representation: How audience-specific reputations affect success in the contemporary art field. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 113–134.
9.
ExleyC. L.LehrN. H.TerryS. J. (2022). Nonprofits in good times and bad times (No. w29630). National Bureau of Economic Research.
10.
FreyB. S. (1998). Superstar museums: An economic analysis. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22(2), 113–125.
11.
GerberA.ChildressC. (2017). The economic world obverse: Freedom through markets after arts education. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(12), 1532–1554.
12.
GreenbergJ.MollickE. (2017). Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female founders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2), 341–374.
13.
HandkeC.Dalla ChiesaC. (2022) The art of crowdfunding arts and innovation: the cultural economic perspective. Journal of Cultural Economics, 46, 249–284.
14.
Harvie. (2015). Funding, philanthropy, structural inequality and decline in England’s theatre ecology. Cultural Trends, 24(1), 56–61.
15.
HellmanzikC. (2013). Democracy and economic outcomes: Evidence from the superstars of modern art. European Journal of Political Economy, 30, 58–69.
16.
JægerM. M.KarlsonK. (2018). Cultural capital and educational inequality: A counterfactual analysis. Sociological Science, 5, 775–795.
17.
KerlinJ.PollakT. H. (2011). Nonprofit commercial revenue. American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 686–704.
18.
KruegerA. B. (2005). The economics of real superstars: The market for rock concerts in the material world. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(1), 1–30.
19.
KushnerR.KingA. E. (1994). Performing arts as a club good: Evidence from a nonprofit organization. Journal of Cultural Economics, 18(1), 15–28.
20.
LukkM.SchneiderhanE.SoaresJ. (2018). Worthy? Crowdfunding the Canadian health care and education sectors. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 55(3), 404–424.
21.
MarquisC.DavisG. F.GlynnM. A. (2013). Golfing alone? Corporations, elites, and nonprofit growth in 100 American communities. Organization Science, 24(1), 39–57.
22.
MengerP. M. (1999). Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 541–574.
OstrowerF. (1998). The arts as cultural capital among elites: Bourdieu's theory reconsidered. Poetics, 26(1), 43–53.
27.
RosenS. (1981). The economics of superstars. The American Economic Review, 71(5), 845–858.
28.
RosensteinC.RileyV.RochaN.BoeneckeT. (2013). The distribution and policy implications of US state government general operating support to the arts and culture: Lessons from the great recession. Cultural Trends, 22(3–4), 180–191.
29.
TerviöM. (2009). Superstars and mediocrities: Market failure in the discovery of talent. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(2), 829–850.
30.
TosattoJ.CoxJ.NguyenT. (2019). An overview of crowdfunding in the creative and cultural industries. In Handbook of Research on Crowdfunding (pp. 269–302).
31.
WoronkowiczJ.NicholsB.IyengarS. (2012). How the United States funds the arts. National Endowment for the Arts.
32.
WyszomirskiM. J.MulcahyK. V. (1995). The organization of public support for the arts. In MulcahyK. V.WyszomirskiM. J. (Eds.), America’s commitment to culture. Westview Press.
