This study analyzed data from a Pew survey (N = 5,681) to see how party identification, political knowledge, and use of different news sources related to two beliefs about COVID-19 promoted on the right early in the pandemic: that the virus was created in a laboratory and that a vaccine for it would be available within a few months. Republicans were more likely to hold these beliefs. The more that people used news outlets with right-leaning audiences, the more likely they were to hold those two beliefs. The more they used news with left-leaning audiences, the less likely they were to believe the virus was laboratory made, a relationship stronger among Democrats. Political knowledge appeared to discourage believing the virus was laboratory-made, again more so among Democrats. However, the more that Democrats (but not Republicans) used news with bipartisan audiences, the more likely they were to believe the virus was laboratory made. Similarly, the more that Democrats (but not Republicans) used social media for news, the more they believed a vaccine would be available soon, and right-leaning news use had a stronger relationship with the early vaccine belief among Democrats.
AielloL. M.BarratA.SchifanellaR.CattutoC.MarkinesB.MenczerF. (2012). Friendship prediction and homophily in social media. ACM Transactions on the Web, 6(2), Article No. 9, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/2180861.2180866
3.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
4.
AllcottH.BoxellL.ConwayJ.GentzkowM.ThalerM.YangD. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254
5.
AllcottH.GentzkowM. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.
ArceneauxK.JohnsonM. (2013). Changing minds or changing channels: Partisan news in an age of choice. University of Chicago Press.
8.
BakshyE.MessingS.AdamicA. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
9.
BarkerD. C.LawrenceA. B. (2006). Media favoritism and presidential nominations: Reviving the direct effects model. Political Communication, 23(1), 41–59. https://doi.org.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/10.1080/10584600500477013
10.
BartelsL. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior, 24 (2), 117–150.
11.
BaumM. A. (2011). Red state, blue state, flu state: Media self-selection and partisan gaps in swine flu vaccinations. Journal of Health Politics, 36(6), 1021–1059. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-1460569
12.
BirnbrauerK.FrohlichD. O.TreiseD. (2017). Inconsistencies in reporting risk information: A pilot analysis of online news coverage of West Nile Virus. Global Health Promotion, 24(3), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975915594603
13.
BolsenT.DruckmanJ. N.CookF. L. (2014). How frames can undermine support for scientific adaptations: Politicization and the status-quo bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft044
14.
BorahP.AustinE.SuY. (2022). Injecting disinfectants to kill the virus: Media literacy, information gathering sources, and the moderating role of political ideology on misperceptions about COVID-19. Mass Communication and Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2045324
15.
BridgmanA.MerkleyE.LoewenP. J.OwenT.RuthsD.TeichmannL.ZhilinO. (2020). The causes and consequences of COVID-19 misperceptions: Understanding the role of news and social media (Vol. 1). Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
16.
BroniatowskiD. A.JamisonA. M.QiS.AlKulaibL.ChenT.BentonA.QuinnS. C.DredzeM. (2018). Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health, 108(10), 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
19.
FeldmanL. (2011). The opinion factor: The effects of opinionated news on information processing and attitude change. Political Communication, 28, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2011.565014
20.
FlynnD.NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38, 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394
21.
FowlerE. F.GollustS. E. (2015). The content and effect of politicized health controversies. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214555505
22.
GarrettR. K.CarnahanD.LynchE. K. (2013). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior, 35(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6
23.
GarrettR. K.GvirsmanS. D.JohnsonB. K.TsfatiY.NeoR.DalA. (2014). Implications of pro- and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40(3), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12028
24.
GarrettR. K.StroudN. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64, 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105
25.
HindmanD. B. (2012). Knowledge gaps, belief gaps, and public opinion about health care reform. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(4), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012456021
26.
HmielowskiJ. D.HutchensM. J.BeamM. A. (2020). Asymmetry of partisan media effects? Examining the reinforcing process of conservative and liberal media with political beliefs. Political Communication, 37(6), 852–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1763525
27.
HollanderB. A. (2018). Partisanship, individual differences, and news media exposure as predictors of conspiracy beliefs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(3), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017728919
JamiesonK. H.AlbarracinD. (2020). The relation between media consumption and misinformation at the outset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the US. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
30.
JamiesonK. H.CappellaJ. (2008). Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. Oxford.
31.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
KahanD. M. (2015). Climate-science communication and themeasurement problem. Advances in Political Psychology, 36, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12244
34.
KahanD. M.Jenkins-SmithH.BramanD. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174.
KuklinskiJ. H.QuirkP. J.JeritJ.SchweiderD.RichR. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. Journal of Politics, 62, 790–816.
37.
KullS.RamsayC.LewisE. (2003). Misperceptions, the media, and the Iraq war. Political Science Quarterly, 118(4), 569–598.
38.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
39.
LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsenB.GaudetH. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.
40.
LeeT. T. (2005). The liberal media myth revisited: An examination of factors influencing perceptions of media bias. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4901_4
41.
LevenduskyM. (2013). How partisan media polarize America. University of Chicago Press.
42.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
43.
MeirickP. C. (2013). Motivated misperception? Party, education, partisan news, and belief in “death panels”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699012468696
44.
MeirickP. C. (2016). Motivated reasoning, accuracy, and updating in perceptions of Bush’s legacy. Social Science Quarterly, 97, 699–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12301
45.
MeirickP. C. (2022). Television news, political comedy, party, and political knowledge in global warming belief: Evidence from a large-scale panel survey. Science Communication, 44(4), 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221119839
46.
MeirickP. C.BessarabovaE. (2016). Epistemic factors in selective exposure and political misperceptions on the right and left. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 16(1), 36–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12101
47.
MeirickP. C.FranklynA. E. (2022). Seeing and believing pro-Trump fake news: The interacting roles of online news sources, partisanship, and education. International Journal of Communication, 16, 3379–3401.
48.
MillerJ. M.SaundersK. L.FarhartC. E. (2016). Conspiracy endorsement as motivated reasoning: The moderating roles of political knowledge and trust. American Journal of Political Science, 60(4), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12234
49.
MorrisJ. S.FranciaP. L. (2010). Cable news, public opinion, and the 2004 party conventions. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 834–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909338463
50.
MottaM.SteculaD.FarhartC. (2020). How right-leaning media coverage of COVID-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic in the U.S. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000396
51.
NyhanB. (2010). Why the ‘death panel’ myth wouldn’t die: Misinformation in the health care reform debate. The Forum, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1354
52.
NyhanB.ReiflerJ. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
53.
OphirY. (2019) The effects of news coverage of epidemics on public support for and compliance with the CDC– An experimental study, Journal of Health Communication, 24(5), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1632990
54.
PennycookG.McPhetresJ.BagoB.RandD. G. (2021). Beliefs about COVID-19 in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A novel test of political polarization and motivated reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(5), 750–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211023652
PetersenM. B.SkovM.SerritzlewS.RamsyT. (2013). Motivated reasoning and political parties: Evidence for increased processing in the face of party cues. Political Behavior, 35, 831–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-012-9213-1
57.
PettyR. E.CaccioppoJ. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.
PriorM. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp002
62.
SchaffnerB. F.LuksS. (2018). Misinformation or expressive responding? What an inauguration crowd can tell us about the source of political misinformation in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(1), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx042
63.
SchaffnerB. F.RocheC. (2017). Misinformation and motivated reasoning: Responses to economic news in a politicized environment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(1), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw043
64.
ShinJ.ThorsonK. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284
65.
SlaterM. D. (2015). Reinforcing spirals model: Conceptualizing the relationship between media content exposure and the development and maintenance of attitudes. Media Psychology, 18(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.897236
66.
StroudN. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford University Press.
67.
SunsteinC. R. (2001). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
68.
Swire-ThompsonB.DeGutisJ.LazerD. (2020). Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3), 286–299.
TurcotteJ.YorkC.IrvingJ.SchollR. M.PingreeR. J. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12127
71.
UscinskiJ. E.EndersA. M.KlofstadC. A.SeeligM. I.FunchionJ. R.EverettC.WuchtyS.PremaratneK.MurthiM. N. (2020). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories?The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review.
72.
WoodT.PorterE. (2019). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior, 41(1), 135–163.
73.
YoungD.BleakleyA. (2020). Ideological health spirals: An integrated political and health communication approach to COVID interventions. International Journal of Communication, 14, 17.
74.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
75.
ZallerJ.FeldmanS. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579–616.
