Game harmony describes how harmonious (nonconflictual) or disharmonious (conflictual) the interests of players are in a game, as embodied in the game’s raw payoffs. It departs from the traditional game-theoretic approach in that it is a nonequilibrium behavioral approach that can be psychologically founded. The authors experimentally test the predictive power of basic game harmony measures on a variety of well-known 2 × 2 games and randomly generated 2 × 2 and 3 × 3 generic games. The findings support its all-rounded predictive power. Game harmony provides an alternative tool that is both powerful and parsimonious, as it does not require information on a player’s degree of rationality, social preferences, beliefs, and perceptions.
AbbinkK.HerrmannB. (2009). The moral costs of nastiness (CeDEx Discussion Paper 2009-10). Nottingham, UK: University of Nottingham.
2.
BacharachM. (2006). Beyond the individual: The theory of cognition and cooperation in games. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BacharachM.GuerraG.ZizzoD. J. (2007). The self-fulfilling property of trust: An experimental study. Theory and Decision, 63, 349-388.
4.
BuschenaD.ZilbermanD. (1999). Testing the effects of similarity on risky choice: Implications for violations of expected utility. Theory and Decision, 46, 251-276.
5.
CamererC. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
ColmanA. M.PulfordB. D.RoseJ. (2008). Collective rationality in interactive decisions: Evidence for team reasoning. Acta Psychologica, 128, 387-397.
8.
Costa-GomesM.CrawfordV. P.BrosetaB. (2001). Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study. Econometrica, 69, 1193-1235.
9.
GibbonsR. (1992). A primer in game theory. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10.
GilboaI.SchmeidlerD. (2001). A theory of case-based decisions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
HahnU.ChaterN. (1997). Concepts and similarity. In LambertsK.ShanksD. (Eds.), Knowledge, concepts and categories (pp. 43-92). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
12.
Hargreaves HeapS. P.ZizzoD. J. (2009). The value of groups. American Economic Review, 99, 295-323.
13.
HarsanyiJ. C.SeltenR. (1988). A general theory of equilibrium selection in games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.
15.
PruittD. G.KimmelM. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363-392.
16.
RankinF. W.Van HuyckJ. B.BattalioR. C. (2000). Strategic similarity and emergent conventions: Evidence from similar Stag Hunt games. Games and Economic Behavior, 32, 315-337.
17.
RapoportA.ChammahA. M. (1965). Prisoner’s Dilemma: A study in conflict and cooperation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18.
SallyD. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas. A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58-92.
19.
StahlD. O.WilsonP. W. (1994). Experimental evidence on players’ models of other players. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 309-327.
20.
StahlD. O.WilsonP. W. (1995). On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 218-254.
21.
TanJ. H. W. (2006). Religion and social preferences: An experimental study. Economics Letters, 90, 60-67.
22.
TanJ. H. W.BolleF. (2006). On the relative strengths of altruism and fairness. Theory and Decision, 60, 35-67.
23.
TanJ. H. W.VogelC. (2008). Religion and trust: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 832-848.
24.
TanJ. H. W.ZizzoD. J. (2008). Groups, cooperation and conflict in games. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1-17.
25.
ZizzoD. J. (2003a). Game perception and harmony in 3 × 3 games: An experiment in cognitive game theory [Mimeo]. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
26.
ZizzoD. J. (2003b). Harmony of games in normal form [Mimeo]. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
27.
ZizzoD. J.OswaldA. J. (2001). Are people willing to pay to reduce others’ incomes?Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 63/64, 39-62.
28.
ZizzoD. J.TanJ. H. W. (2007). Perceived harmony, similarity and cooperation in 2 × 2 games: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 365-386.
