The 2004 U.S. presidential election was called one of the most important in history. The world’s only remaining superpower’s election captured international attention as never before. This article examines how international observers discussed the election via reactions to the debates by using DebateWatch transcripts and surveys. The study finds media framing in a person’s home country as well as a greater sense of globalization contributed to participants’ perspectives. Although participants were influenced by cultural and political issues in their home countries, they were also influenced by what they observed in the debates, and they demonstrated greater understanding of the U.S. electoral process, the candidates, and the issues.
Aday, S. (2004, May). Embedding the truth: A cross-cultural analysis of objectivity and television coverage of the Iraq War. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, NewOrleans, LA.
2.
Burgoon, J. K. (1995). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural theory (pp. 194-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Carlin, D. B. (1994). Implications for future debate. In D. B. Carlin & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 205-215). Westport, CT: Praeger.
4.
Carlin, D. B., & Anderson, K. (2003). Across the ages: Views of the 2000 debates from college freshmen to senior citizens. In L. L. Kaid, D. G. Bystrom, J. C. Tedesco, & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The millennium election: Communication in the 2000 campaign. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5.
Carlin, D. B., & McKinney, M. S. (Eds.). (1994). The 1992 presidential debates in focus. Westport, CT: Praeger.
6.
Coleman, S. (2000). Meaningful political debate in the age of the soundbite. In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 1-24). New York: St. Martin’s.
7.
Commission on Presidential Debates. (2004, October). DebateWatch 2004 results. Retrieved January 10, 2005, from http://www.debates.org/pages/news_041025.html
8.
Crispin, M. C., Lee, S. T., & Kim, H. S. (2004, May). Framing analysis of a conflict: How five Asian countries covered the war on Iraq. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, NewOrleans, LA.
9.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
10.
Holbrook, T. (1999). Political learning from presidential debates. Political Behavior, 21(1), 67-89.
11.
Jamieson, K. H., & Adasiewicz C. (2000). What can voters learn from election debates? In S. Coleman (Ed.), Televised election debates: International perspectives (pp. 25-42). New York: St. Martin’s.
12.
Katovsky, B., & Carlson, T. (2003). Embedded: The media at war in Iraq. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press.
13.
Mayer, M. A., & Carlin, B. D. (1994). Debates as a voter education tool. In D. B. Carlin & M. S. McKinney (Eds.), The 1992 presidential debates in focus (pp. 127-138). Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
McKinney, M. S., & Lamoureux, E. R. (1999). Citizen response to the 1996 debates: Focusing on the focus group. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Ed.), The electronic election (pp. 163-178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
National Communication Association. (n.d.). About NCA. Retrieved from http://www.natcom.org/AboutNCA/about_nca1.htm
16.
Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583.
17.
Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61, 1040-1067.
18.
Singer, M. R. (1998). Perception and identity in intercultural communication. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
19.
Toffler, A., & Toffler H. (2004). Whose election is this, anyhow?Segye-Ilbo. Retrieved November 1, 2004, from http://www.segye.com/Service5/ShellView.asp?SiteID=&OrgTreeID=1188&TreeID=1184&Pcode=0007&DataID=200407221335000064
20.
Wicks, R., & Wicks, J. L. (2004, May). Televised coverage of the war in Iraq on Al Jazeera, CNN and Fox News. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
