This study examines how exposure to a televised debate affects young citizens' normative democratic tendencies, attitudes that have been linked to increased civic and political participation, including voting behavior. The authors also are interested in the confidence young citizens express in the political knowledge they possess—their political information efficacy—and specifically how confidence in one's knowledge may be affected by exposure to such a sustained and “information-rich” source of campaign information as a 90-minute candidate debate. Findings reveal that debates strengthen, at least in the short term, democratic attitudes and also strengthen young citizens' levels of political information efficacy.
Acock, A., Clarke, H.D., & Stewart, M.C. (1985). A new model for old measures: A covariance structure analysis of political efficacy. Journal of Politics, 47, 1062-1084.
2.
Burbank, L. (2004, November 4). Disappointment with results of higher youth vote turnout. All Things Considered [Electronic version]. Available from http://www.lexisnexis.com/universe
3.
Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W.E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
4.
Chaffee, S.H. (1978). Presidential debates: Are they helpful to voters?Communication Monographs, 45, 330-346.
5.
Chamberlain, L. (2004, November 21). Young voters packed less wallop. The New York Times, p. 17 [Electronic version]. Available from http://www.lexisnexis.com/universe
6.
Clarke, H.D., & Acock, A.C. (1989). National elections and political attitudes: The case of political efficacy. British Journal of Political Science , 19, 551-562.
7.
Commission on Presidential Debates. (2004). Debate history: 2004 debates. Available from http://www.debates.org
8.
Delli Carpini, M.X. (2004). Mediating democratic engagement: The impact of communications on citizens' involvement in political and civic life. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 395-434). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Delli Carpini, M.X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Finkel, S.E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 891-913.
11.
Geer, J.G. (1988). The effects of presidential debates on the electorate's preferences for candidates. American Politics Quarterly, 16, 486-501.
12.
Kaid, L.L., Hendren, A.G., Hyun-Jung, Y., Landreville, K., Postelnicu, M., & Urriste, S. (2005, November). Comparing the effects of television advertising and debates on young citizens. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association , Boston.
13.
Kaid, L.L., Johnston, A., & Hale, K. (1989). Mass media and political disapprobation. Political Communication Review, 14, 51-72.
14.
Kaid, L.L., McKinney, M.S., & Tedesco, J.C. (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: Candidate, media, and public voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
15.
Kaid, L.L., McKinney, M.S., & Tedesco, J.C. (2007). Political information efficacy and young voters . American Behavioral Scientist, 50(9), 1093-1111.
16.
Kaid, L.L., Tedesco, J.C., & McKinney, M.S. (2004). Political information efficacy and younger voters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.
17.
Katz, E., & Feldman, J.J. (1962). The debates in the light of research: A survey of surveys. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960 (pp. 173-223). Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
18.
Kerlinger, F.N., & Lee, H.B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19.
Lemert, J.B. (1993). Do televised presidential debates help inform voters?Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37, 83-94.
20.
Levine, P., & Lopez, M.H. (2002). Youth voter turnout has declined, by any measure . College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. Retrieved December 1, 2002, from http://www.civicyouth.org
21.
McKinney, M.S., & Banwart, M.C. (2005). Rocking the youth vote through debate: Examining the effects of a citizen versus journalist controlled debate on civic engagement. JournalismStudies, 6, 153-163.
22.
McKinney, M.S., & Carlin, D.B. (2004). Political campaign debates. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
McKinney, M.S., Spiker, J.A., & Kaid, L.L. (1998). DebateWatch '96 and citizen engagement: Building democracy through citizen communication. In T. J. Johnson, C. E. Hayes, & S. P. Hayes (Eds.), Engaging the public: How government and the media can reinvigorate American democracy (pp. 185-193). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
24.
McLeod, J.M., Bybee, C.R., & Durall, J.A. (1979a). Equivalence of informed participation: The 1976 presidential debates as a source of influence. In G. C. Wilhoit & H. deBock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook 2 (pp. 469-493). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
McLeod, J.M., Durrall, J., Ziemke, D., & Bybee, C. (1979b). Reactions of young and older voters: Expanding the context of effects. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 348-367). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
26.
Miller, A.H., & MacKuen, M. (1979). Informing the electorate: A national study. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 269-297). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27.
Mutz, D., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99, 1-15.
28.
Niemi, R.G., Craig, S.C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review , 85, 1407-1413.
29.
Patterson, T.E. (2002). The vanishing voter: Public involvement in an age of uncertainty. New York: Knopf .
30.
Pfau, M. (2003). The changing nature of presidential debate influence in the new age of mass media communication. Paper presented at the ninth annual Conference on Presidential Rhetoric, Texas A&M University, College Station.
31.
Pfau, M., Houston, J.B., & Semmler, S.M. (2005). Presidential election campaigns and American democracy: The relationship between communication use and normative outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 48-62.
32.
Popkin, S.L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Scarborough, J. (2004, November 15). Scarborough country. MSNBC transcripts [Electronic version]. Available from http://www.lexisnexis.com/universe
34.
Sears, D.O., & Chaffee, S.H. (1979). Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 223-261). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
35.
Spiker, J.A. (2005). Engaging the disengaged: Understanding young citizens' political malaise. In M. S. McKinney, L. L. Kaid, D. G. Bystrom , & D. B. Carlin (Eds.), Communicating politics: Engaging the public in democratic life (pp. 297-307). New York: Peter Lang.
36.
Spiker, J.A., & McKinney, M.S. (1999). Measuring political malaise in the 1996 presidential election. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 319-334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Wald, K., & Lupfer, M. (1978). The presidential debate as a civics lesson. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 342-353.
38.
Youth voting in the 2004 election. (2004). College Park, MD: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. Retrieved December 15, 2004, from http://www.civicyouth.org
