We investigate the emergence and growth of “green chemistry”—an effort by chemists to encourage other chemists to reduce the health, safety, and environmental impacts of chemical products and processes—to explore how occupational members, absent external triggers for change, influence how their peers do their work. Using extensive interviews, archival data, and observations, we find that advocates simultaneously advanced different frames that specified the utility of making the change: (1) a normalizing frame, positioning green chemistry as consistent with mainstream chemistry innovation; (2) a moralizing frame, positioning it as an ethical imperative; and (3) a pragmatizing frame, positioning it as a tool that could help chemists tackle problems they encountered in their day-to-day work. Each frame resonated differently with chemists in their various occupational roles. Though this pluralistic approach generated broad acceptance of the change effort, it also exposed tensions, which threatened the coherence of the change. Advocates’ diverse responses to these tensions contribute to a persistent state of pluralism and dynamism in the change effort. We uncover a process through which occupational members generate and sustain change, show how occupational heterogeneity can enable and delimit change, and show how well-meaning efforts to “moralize” occupational work can heighten resistance, inhibiting the very changes that enable experts to address urgent societal problems.
AbbottA.1988 “Transcending general linear reality.” Sociological Theory, 6: 169–186.
2.
AnastasP. T.KirchhoffM. M.2002 “Origins, current status, and future challenges of green chemistry.” Accounts of Chemical Research, 35: 686–694.
3.
AnastasP. T.WarnerJ. C.1998Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
AndersonM.EscherP.2010The MBA Oath: Setting a Higher Standard for Business Leaders. New York: Penguin.
5.
AnsariS. M.FissP. C.ZajacE. J.2010 “Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse.” Academy of Management Review, 35: 67–92.
6.
AntebyM.2008 “Identity incentives as an engaging form of control: Revisiting leniencies in an aeronautic plant.” Organization Science, 19: 202–220.
7.
AshcraftK. L.2013 “The glass slipper: ‘Incorporating’ occupational identity in management studies.” Academy of Management Review, 38: 6–31.
8.
AshforthB. E.2001Role Transitions in Organizational Life: An Identity-based Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
BaileyD. E.LeonardiP. M.ChongJ.2010 “Minding the gaps: Understanding technology interdependence and coordination in knowledge work.” Organization Science, 21: 713–730.
10.
BansalP.2003 “From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues.” Organization Science, 14: 510–527.
11.
BarleyS. R.1986 “Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 78–108.
12.
BarleyS. R.KundaG.2001 “Bringing work back in.” Organization Science, 12: 76–95.
13.
BechkyB. A.2011 “Making organizational theory work: Institutions, occupations and negotiated orders.” Organization Science, 22: 1157–1167.
14.
BenfordR. D.SnowD. A.2000 “Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611–639.
15.
BöschenS.LenoirD.ScheringerM.2003 “Sustainable chemistry: Starting points and prospects.” Naturwissenschaften, 90: 93–102.
16.
BourdieuP.1999 “The specificity of the scientific field.” In BiagioliM. (ed.), The Science Studies Reader: 31–50. New York: Routledge.
17.
BravermanH.1974Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
18.
BucherR.StraussA.1961 “Professions in process.” American Journal of Sociology, 66: 325–334.
19.
CarlileP. R.2002 “A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development.” Organization Science, 13: 442–455.
20.
ChreimS.WilliamsB. B.HiningsC. B.2007 “Interlevel influences on the reconstruction of professional role identity.” Academy of Management Journal, 50: 1515–1539.
21.
CornelissenJ. P.WernerM. D.2014 “Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature.” Academy of Management Annals, 8: 181–235.
22.
CovaleskiM. A.DirsmithM. W.HeianJ. B.SamuelS.1998 “The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43: 293–327.
23.
DunnM. B.JonesC.2010 “Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 55: 114–149.
24.
DuttonJ. E.AshfordS. J.O’NeillR. M.LawrenceK. A.2001 “Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change.” Academy of Management Journal, 44: 716–736.
FineG. A.1996 “Justifying work: Occupational rhetorics as resources in restaurant kitchens.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 90–115.
27.
FriedsonE.2001Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28.
GeorgeG.Howard-GrenvilleJ.JoshiA.TihanyiL.2016 “Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research.” Academy of Management Journal, 59: 1880–1895.
29.
GioiaD. A.NagR.CorleyK. G.2012 “Visionary ambiguity and strategic change: The virtue of vagueness in launching major organizational change.” Journal of Management Inquiry, 21: 364–375.
30.
GoodrickE.ReayT.2010 “Florence Nightingale endures: Legitimizing a new professional role identity.” Journal of Management Studies, 47: 55–84.
31.
GoodrickE.ReayT.2011 “Constellations of institutional logics changes in the professional work of pharmacists.” Work and Occupations, 38: 372–416.
32.
GreenwoodR.RaynardM.KodeihF.MicelottaE. R.LounsburyM.2011 “Institutional complexity and organizational responses.” Academy of Management Annals, 5: 317–371.
33.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR.HiningsC. R.2002 “Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields.” Academy of Management Journal, 45: 58–80.
34.
Howard-GrenvilleJ. A.2007 “Developing issue-selling effectiveness over time: Issue selling as resourcing.” Organization Science, 18: 560–577.
35.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.BuckleS. J.HoskinsB. J.GeorgeG.2014 “Climate change and management.” Academy of Management Journal, 57: 615–623.
36.
HughesE. C.1971The Sociological Eye: On Work, Self, and the Study of Society. New York: Aldine-Atherton.
37.
IbarraH.1999 “Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 764–791.
38.
IlesA.2013 “Greening chemistry: Emerging epistemic political tensions in California and the United States.” Public Understanding of Science, 22: 460–478.
39.
JonesC.MaoretM.MassaF. G.SvejenovaS.2012 “Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category ‘modern architecture,’ 1870–1975.” Organization Science, 23: 1523–1545.
40.
KangE.2010 “Commentary: An industrial perspective on green chemistry.” Tetrahedron, 66: 1029–1030.
41.
KaplanS.2008 “Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty.” Organization Science, 19: 729–752.
42.
KelloggK. C.2009 “Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery.” American Journal of Sociology, 115: 657–711.
43.
KelloggK. C.2011 “Hot lights and cold steel: Cultural and political toolkits for practice change in surgery.” Organization Science, 22: 482–502.
44.
KrepsT. A.MoninB.2011 “‘Doing well by doing good’? Ambivalent moral framing in organizations.” In StawB. M.BriefA. P. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 31: 99–123. New York: Elsevier.
45.
KundaG.1992Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-tech Organization. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
46.
LampelJ.LantT.ShamsieJ.2000 “Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries.” Organization Science, 11: 263–269.
47.
LeavittK.ReynoldsS. J.BarnesC. M.SchilpzandP.HannahS. T.2012 “Different hats, different obligations: Plural occupational identities and situated moral judgments.” Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1316–1333.
48.
LefsrudL. M.MeyerR. E.2012 “Science or science fiction? Professionals’ discursive construction of climate change.” Organization Studies, 33: 1477–1506.
49.
LeonardiP. M.BarleyS. R.2010 “What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing.” Academy of Management Annals, 4: 1–51.
50.
LeonardiP. M.JacksonM. H.DiwanA.2009 “The enactment–externalization dialectic: Rationalization and the persistence of counterproductive technology design practices in student engineering.” Academy of Management Journal, 52: 400–420.
51.
LinthorstJ. A.2010 “An overview: Origins and development of green chemistry.” Foundations of Chemistry, 12: 55–68.
52.
LounsburyM.2001 “Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 29–56.
53.
MaguireS.HardyC.2009 “Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT.” Academy of Management Journal, 52: 148–178.
54.
MaguireS.HardyC.2013 “Organizing processes and the construction of risk: A discursive approach.” Academy of Management Journal, 56: 231–255.
55.
ManleyJ. B.AnastasP. T.CueB. W.2008 “Frontiers in green chemistry: Meeting the grand challenges for sustainability in R&D and manufacturing.” Journal of Cleaner Production, 16: 743–750.
56.
MantereS.2008 “Role expectations and middle manager strategic agency.” Journal of Management Studies, 45: 294–316.
57.
MatusK. J.ClarkW. C.AnastasP. T.ZimmermanJ. B.2012 “Barriers to the implementation of green chemistry in the United States.” Environmental Science and Technology, 46: 10892–10899.
58.
MeyerA. D.1984 “Mingling decision making metaphors.” Academy of Management Review, 9: 6–17.
59.
MeyersonD. E.ScullyM. A.1995 “Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change.” Organization Science, 6: 585–600.
60.
MinsonJ. A.MoninB.2012 “Do-gooder derogation disparaging morally motivated minorities to defuse anticipated reproach.” Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3: 200–207.
61.
MurrayF.2002 “Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering.” Research Policy, 31: 1389–1403.
62.
NameroffT. J.GarantR. J.AlbertM. B.2004 “Adoption of green chemistry: An analysis based on US patents.” Research Policy, 33: 959–974.
63.
NelsonA.EarleA.Howard-GrenvilleJ.HaackJ.YoungD.2014 “Do innovation measures actually measure innovation? Obliteration, symbolic adoption and other finicky challenges in measuring innovation diffusion.” Research Policy, 43: 927–940.
64.
NelsonA.IrwinJ.2014 “Defining what we do—all over again: Occupational identity, technological change, and the librarian/Internet-search relationship.” Academy of Management Journal, 57: 892–928.
65.
NigamA.2013 “How institutional change and individual researchers helped advance clinical guidelines in American health care.” Social Science and Medicine, 87: 16–22.
66.
OkhuysenG. A.BechkyB. A.2009 “Coordination in organizations: An integrative perspective.” Academy of Management Annals, 3: 463–502.
67.
PowellW. W.KoputK. W.Smith-DoerrL.1996 “Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116–145.
68.
PrattM. G.RockmannK. W.KaufmannJ. B.2006 “Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents.” Academy of Management Journal, 49: 235–262.
69.
ReayT.ChreimS.Golden-BiddleK.GoodrickE.WilliamsB. E.CasebeerA.PabloA.HiningsC. R.2013 “Transforming new ideas into practice: An activity based perspective on the institutionalization of practices.” Journal of Management Studies, 50: 963–990.
70.
ReayT.Golden-BiddleK.GermannK.2006 “Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and micro-processes of change.” Academy of Management Journal, 49: 977–998.
71.
SjöströmJ.2006 “Green chemistry in perspective—Models for GC activities and GC policy and knowledge areas.” Green Chemistry, 8: 130–137.
72.
SmetsM.MorrisT. I. M.GreenwoodR.2012 “From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change.” Academy of Management Journal, 55: 877–904.
73.
StarrP.1982 “Transformation of defeat: The changing objectives of national health insurance, 1915–1980.” American Journal of Public Health, 72: 78–88.
74.
TuckerJ. L.2006 “Green chemistry, a pharmaceutical perspective.” Organic Process Research and Development, 10: 315–319.
75.
Van MaanenJ.BarleyS. R.1984 “Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations.” In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 6: 287–365. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
76.
WoodhouseE. J.BreymanS.2005 “Green chemistry as social movement?” Science, Technology, and Human Values, 30: 199–222.
77.
WrightA.ZammutoR.LieschP.2015 “Maintaining the values of a profession: Institutional work and moral emotions in the emergency department.” Academy of Management Journal (forthcoming), published online ahead of print: DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0870.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
