Management scholars are increasingly expressing a desire to conduct research that aims to solve social and environmental issues. Expectations from universities and funding bodies for research with societal impact are also growing. Yet, there are many unanswered questions about what impact-driven research looks like and how it can be conducted rigorously. This special issue seeks to address this problem. In this introduction, we propose a guiding framework for generative impact-driven research.
AnsellC (2011) Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BansalPSharmaG (2022) Three different approaches to impact: Translating, cocreating, and performing. Business & Society61(4): 827–832.
3.
BartunekJMRynesSL (2014) Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic-practitioner relationships. Journal of Management40(5): 1181–1201.
4.
CunliffeALPavlovichK (2022) Making our work matter: From spectator to engagement through public organization and management studies. Academy of Management Perspectives36(3): 879–895.
5.
GrayB (1989) Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
6.
GümüsayAAReineckeJ (2024) Imagining desirable futures: A call for prospective theorizing with speculative rigour. Organization Theory1: 1–23.
7.
HamannRNilssonWDrimieS, et al. (2024) Researchers convening dialogue to address grand challenges: Affordances, tensions, and the shift to deep dialogue. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 24 August. DOI: 10.1177/14761270241279132.
8.
HarleyB (2015) The one best way? “Scientific” research on HRM and the threat to critical scholarship. Human Resource Management Journal25(4): 399–407.
9.
HarleyBCornelissenJ (2022) Rigour with or without templates? The pursuit of methodological rigour in qualitative research methods. Organizational Research Methods25(2): 239–261.
10.
HarleyBFlemingP (2021) Not even trying to change the world: Why do elite management journals ignore the major problems facing humanity?The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science57(2): 133–152.
11.
JarzabkowskiPBednarekRChalkiasK, et al. (2021) Enabling rapid financial response to disasters: Knotting and reknotting multiple paradoxes in interorganizational systems. Academy of Management Journal65(5): 1477–1506.
12.
JarzabkowskiPBednarekRChalkiasK, et al. (2024) Translating, co-creating, and performing: Reflections on a 15-year journey for impact into the grand challenge of disaster insurance. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 28 November. DOI: 10.1177/14761270231218094.
13.
KieserALeinerL (2009) Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies46(3): 516–533.
14.
KieserANicolaiASeidelD (2015) The practical relevance of management research: Turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous program of scientific research. Academy of Management Annals9(1): 143–233.
15.
LangleyAKlagM (2019) Being where? Navigating the involvement paradox in qualitative research accounts. Organizational Research Methods22(2): 515–538.
16.
LivingstonBGloorJLWardAK, et al. (2024) Many roads to success: Broadening our views of academic career paths and advice. Journal of Management50(4): 1186–1197.
17.
LuederitzCEtzionD (2024) Generativity as a heuristic for impact-driven scholars addressing grand challenges. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 2 March. DOI: 10.1177/14761270241239137.
18.
ReineckeJBoxenbaumEGehmanJ (2022) Impactful theory: Pathways to mattering. Organization Theory3(4): 1–20.
19.
SharmaGBansalP (2020) Cocreating rigorous and relevant knowledge. Academy of Management Journal63(2): 386–410.
20.
SimsekZBansalPShawJD, et al. (2018) From the editors—Seeing practice impact in new ways. Academy of Management Journal61(6): 2021–2025.
21.
SlawinskiNBritoBBrentonJ, et al. (2024) Reflections on deep academic-practitioner partnering for generative societal impact. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 9 August. DOI: 10.1177/14761270241274590.
22.
TsuiAS (2021) Responsible research and responsible leadership studies. Academy of Management Discoveries7(2): 166–170.
23.
TsuiAS (2022) From responsible research to traditional research: The necessity of scientific freedom and scientific responsibility for better societies. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior9: 1–32.
24.
TsuiASMcKiernanP (2022) Understanding scientific freedom and scientific responsibility in business and management research. Journal of Management Studies59: 1604–1627.
25.
TsuiASBitnerMJNetessineS (2023) What topics should business school research focus on?Global Focus Annual Research1: 25–32.
26.
WegenerFELeeJYMascena BarbosaA, et al. (2024) From impact to impacting: A pragmatist perspective on tackling grand challenges. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 2 March. DOI: 10.1177/14761270241238915.
27.
WickertCPostCDohJP, et al. (2021) Management research that makes a difference: Broadening the meaning of impact. Journal of Management Studies58(2): 297–320.
28.
WierengaMHeucherKChenS, et al. (2024) Communities for impact: Empowering early-career researchers in the pursuit of impact. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 9 August. DOI: 10.1177/14761270241274038.
29.
WilliamsAWhitemanG (2021) A call for deep engagement for impact: Addressing the planetary emergency. Strategic Organization19(3): 526–537.
30.
WilliamsAWhitemanGWallsJ, et al. (2022) Call for papers: Special issue of strategic organization: Impact driven strategy research for grand challenges. Strategic Organization20(1): 225–227.
31.
ZandeeDCoghlanD (2024) Action research for impact in addressing the grand challenges. Strategic Organization. Epub ahead of print 2 August. DOI: 10.1177/14761270241270913.
