Past research on organizational change has explored how workers embrace change in some scenarios, resist it in others, and in some cases, subtly circumvent change efforts by feigning conformity. What remains unclear is the role of occupations in explaining workers’ responses to change. Using survey data (N = 226) and in-depth interviews with workers (N = 33) in a neonatal intensive care unit as it transitioned from a multiple-occupancy ward design to single-patient rooms, this study examines occupational discrepancies in reactions to the change. Findings reveal that misgivings about the move vary considerably across groups and illustrate the enduring significance of occupational identity.
AbbottA. (1988). System of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor.
The University of Chicago Press.
2.
American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2018). State practice environment.
3.
ArmenakisA. A.BernerthJ. B.PittsJ. P.WalkerH. J. (2007).
Organizational change recipients’ beliefs scale: Development of an assessment instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
43(4), 481–505.
4.
BartunekJ. M.RousseauD. M.RudolphJ. W.DePalmaJ. A. (2006).
On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
42(2), 182–206.
5.
BhattacherjeeA.HikmetN. (2007).
Physicians’ resistance toward healthcare information technology: A theoretical model and empirical test. European Journal of Information Systems,
16, 725–737.
6.
BreenR.KarlsonK.HolmA. (2013).
Total, direct, and indirect effects in logit and probit models. Sociological Methods & Research,
42(2), 164–191.
7.
BrooksJ. V.BoskC. L. (2012).
Remaking surgical socialization: Work hour restrictions, rites of passage, and occupational identity. Social Science and Medicine,
75(9), 1625–1632.
8.
ChoiM. (2011).
Employees’ attitudes toward organizational change: A literature review. Human Resource Management,
50(4), 479–500.
9.
CunninghamC. E.WoodwardC. A.ShannonH. S.MacIntoshJ.LendrumB.RosenbloomD.BrownJ. (2002).
Readiness for organizational change: A longitudinal study of workplace, psychological and behavioural correlates. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
75, 377–392.
10.
DiMaggioP. (1997).
Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology,
23, 263–287.
11.
DomanicoR.DavisD. K.ColemanF.DavisB. O. (2010).
Documenting the NICU design dilemma: Parent and staff perceptions of open ward versus single family room units. Journal of Perinatology,
30(5), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.195
12.
DonettoS.PenfoldC.AndersonJ.RobertG.MabenR. J. (2017).
Nursing work and sensory experiences of hospital design: A before and after qualitative study following a move to all-single room inpatient accommodation. Health & Place,
46, 121–129.
13.
DopsonS.FitzGeraldL.FerlieE.GabbayJ.LocockL. (2002).
No magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based. Health Care Management Review,
27(3), 35–47.
14.
DrzenskyF.van DickR. (2013). Organizational identification and organizational change. In S. Oreg, A. Michel, & R. T. By (Eds.), The psychology of organizational change (pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press.
15.
EilamG.ShamirB. (2005).
Organizational change and self-concept threats a theoretical perspective and a case study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
41(4), 399–421.
16.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes.
The University of Chicago Press.
17.
FerlieE.FitzGeraldL.WoodM.HawkinsC. (2005).
The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. Academy of Management,
48(1), 117–134.
18.
FineG. A.HallettT. (2014).
Group cultures and everyday life of organizations: Interaction orders and meso-analysis. Organization Studies,
35(12), 1773–1792.
19.
FloydA. M. D. (2005).
Challenging designs of neonatal intensive care units. Critical Care Nurse,
25(5), 59–66.
20.
GleibsI. H.MummendeyA.NoackP. (2008).
Predictors of change in postmerger identification during a merger process: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
95(5), 1095–1112.
21.
HaffertyF. W.CastellaniB. (2011). Two cultures: Two ships: The rise of a professionalism movement within modern medicine and medical sociology’s disappearance from the professionalism debate. In B. A. Pescosolido, J. K. Martin, J. D. McLeod, & A. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of health, illness, and healing: A blueprint for the 21st century (pp. 201–219). Springer.
22.
HeimerC. A.StevensM. L. (1997).
Caring for the organization: Social workers as frontline risk managers in neonatal intensive care units. Work and Occupations,
24(2), 133–163.
23.
HodsonR. (1997).
Group relations at work: Solidarity, conflict, and relations with management. Work and Occupations,
24(4), 426–452.
24.
HoffT. J. (2003).
How physician-employees experience their work lives in a changing HMO. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,
44(1), 75–96.
25.
HoffT. J.McCaffreyD. P. (1996).
Adapting, resisting, and negotiating: How physicians cope with organizational and economic change. Work and Occupations,
23(2), 165–189.
26.
HornungS.RousseauD. M. (2007).
Active on the job—Proactive in change how autonomy at work contributes to employee support for organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
43(4), 401–426.
27.
HunzakerM. B. F. (2014).
Making sense of misfortune: Cultural schemas, victim redefinition, and the perpetuation of stereotypes. Social Psychology Quarterly,
77(2), 166–184.
28.
JonesL.WatsonB.HobmanE.BordiaP.GalloisC.CallanV. J. (2008).
Employee perceptions of organizational change: Impact of hierarchical level. Leadership & Organization Development Journal,
29(4), 294–316.
29.
KelloggK. C. (2009).
Operating room: Relational spaces and microinstitutional change in surgery. American Journal of Sociology,
115(3), 657–711.
30.
LeichtK. T.FennellM.WitkowskiK. M. (1995).
The effects of hospital characteristics and radical organizational change on the relative standing of health care professionals. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,
36(2), 151–167.
31.
McMenaminP. (2015). Diversity among registered nurses: Slow but steady progress.
American Nurses Association.
32.
OregS.VakolaM.ArmenakisA. A. (2011).
Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,
47(4), 461–524.
33.
PideritS. K. (2000).
Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review,
25(4), 783–794.
34.
ScottD. (1989).
Meaning construction and social work practice. Social Service Review,
63(1), 39–51.
35.
ShepleyM. M.HarrisD. D.WhiteR. (2008).
Open-bay and single-family room neonatal intensive care units: Caregiver satisfaction and stress. Environment and Behavior,
40(2), 249–268.
36.
SmallM. L. (2011).
How to conduct a mixed methods study: Recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual Review of Sociology,
37(1), 57–86.
37.
SubramanianD.SuquetJ.-B. (2018).
Unpacking the service triangle: Arranging power relations between frontline occupations. Work and Occupations,
45(1), 38–81.
38.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup conflict (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
39.
VaiseyS. (2009).
Motivation and justification: A dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology,
114(6), 1675–1715.
40.
van DickR.UllrichJ.TissingtonP. A. (2006).
Working under a black cloud: How to sustain organizational identification after a merger. British Journal of Management,
17, S69–S79.
41.
VanHeuvelenJ. (2019).
Isolation or interaction: Healthcare provider experience of design change. Sociology of Health & Illness,
41(4), 692–708.
42.
WalshW. F.McCulloughK. L.WhiteR. D. (2006).
Room for improvement: Nurses’ perceptions of providing care in a single room newborn intensive care setting. Advances in Neonatal Care,
6(5), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adnc.2006.06.002
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
