We evaluated the veracity of a famous aphorism that is often cited in the scientific study of religion: “There are no atheists in foxholes.” To provide a critical evaluation, the sample was drawn from one of the world's most secular spots, Sweden. We explored the prevalence of various religious beliefs/non-beliefs and prayer in a sample of parents (n = 57) living with a major threat: having a child with a life-threatening heart condition. For comparison purposes, the prevalence of such beliefs and prayer were explored also in a sample (n = 72) of parents with healthy children. Results showed that a majority of parents endorsed atheist or agnostic beliefs, whereas only a minority endorsed religious beliefs. Roughly half of the sample engaged in prayer. The group of parents with sick children was statistically indistinguishable from the comparison group parents on all variables. Also, between-group differences were generally negligible in terms of effect size; thus, the null results were not due to statistical power problems. We conclude that there may be plenty of atheists in some foxholes.
AhmadiF. (2006). Culture, religion, and spirituality in coping: The example of cancer patients in Sweden.Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Studia Sociologica Upsaliensia, 53.
2.
ArgyleM., & Beit-HallahmiB. (1975). The social psychology of religion.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
3.
BergerP. L. (1999). The desecularization of the world: A global overview. In BergerP. L. (Ed.), The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics (pp. 1–18). Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
4.
BeringJ. (2010). Atheism is only skin deep: Geertz and Markusson rely mistakenly on sociodemographic data as meaningful indicators of underlying cognition. Religion, 40, 166–168.
5.
BjorckJ. P., & CohenL. H. (1993). Coping with threats, losses, and challenges. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 56–72.
6.
Caldwell-HarrisC. L. (2012). Understanding atheism/non-belief as an expected individual differences variable. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 2, 4–23.
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
ExlineJ. J., & MartinA. (2005). Anger toward God: A new frontier in forgiveness research. In WorthingtonE. I.Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 73–88). New York: Routledge.
9.
ForsbergA., & KjellssonP. (1996). Sorgen bor i hjärtat. [Sorrow lives in the heart]. Kalmar, Sweden: Hjärtebarnsförbundet.
10.
GillA., & LundsgaardeE. (2004). State welfare spending and religiosity: A cross-national analysis. Rationality and Society, 16, 399.
11.
GlockC. Y., & StarkR. (1965). Religion and society in tension.Chicago: Rand McNally.
12.
GranqvistP. (1998). Religiousness and perceived childhood attachment: On the question of compensation or correspondence. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 350–367.
13.
GranqvistP., & HagekullB. (2001). Seeking security in the new age: On attachment and emotional compensation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 529–547.
14.
GranqvistP., & HagekullB. (2003). Longitudinal predictions of religious change in adolescence: Contributions from the interaction of attachment and relationship status. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 793–817.
15.
GranqvistP., & KirkpatrickL. A. (2008). Attachment and religious representations and behavior. In CassidyJ., & ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. (2nd ed., pp. 906–933). New York: Guilford.
16.
GranqvistP., & KirkpatrickL. A. (2013). Religion, spirituality, and attachment. In PargamentK. (Ed.), APA handbook for the psychology of religion and spirituality: Context, theory, and research (Vol. 1, pp. 129–155). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
GranqvistP.MikulincerM.GewirtzV., & ShaverP. R. (2012). Experimental findings on God as an attachment figure—Normative processes and moderating effects of internal working models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 804–818.
18.
GranqvistP.MikulincerM., & ShaverP. R. (2010). Religion as attachment: Normative processes and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 49–59.
19.
HoodR. W.Jr.SpilkaB.HunsbergerB., & GorsuchR. (1996). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
20.
HoodR. W.Jr.HillP. C., & SpilkaB. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). New York: Guilford.
21.
HoutmanD., & AupersS. (2007). The spiritual turn and the decline of tradition: The spread of post-Christian spirituality in 14 Western countries, 1981-2000. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 305–320.
22.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1998). God as a substitute attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult attachment style and religious change in college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 961–973.
23.
KirkpatrickL. A., & ShaverP. R. (1990). Attachment theory and religion: Childhood attachments, religious beliefs, and conversion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 315–334.
24.
KoenigH. G.KingD. E., & CarsonV. B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
LaddK. L., & SpilkaB. (2002). Inward, outward, upward prayer: Cognitive aspects of prayer. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 475–484.
26.
LaddK. L., & SpilkaB. (2006). Inward, outward, upward prayer: Scale reliability and validation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45, 233–251.
27.
MarxK. (1964). Early writings.New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
McCraeR. R. (1984). Situational determinants of coping responses: Loss, threat, and challenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 919–928.
29.
ScheveK., & StasavageD. (2006). Religion and preferences for social insurance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1, 255–286.
30.
PargamentK. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping.New York: Guilford.
31.
VailK. E.RotschildZ. K.WeiseD. R.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT., & GreenbergJ. (2010). A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 84–94.
32.
World Values Survey Association. (1995). World values survey.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
