This investigation analyzed Islamic spirituality as measured by a Muslim Experiential Religiousness Scale. Iranian university and seminary students (N = 351) responded to this instrument along with the Psychological Measure of Islamic Religiousness (PMIR) and Perceived Stress and Self-Esteem scales. Muslim Experiential Religiousness correlated predictably with all PMIR sub-scales, Perceived Stress, and Self-Esteem, and mediated almost all relationships of the PMIR Islamic Beliefs subscale with religious functioning. When evaluated by participants, Muslim Experiential Religiousness items proved to be “rational” relative to their Muslim religious ideals. Women in an Islamic seminary scored higher on Muslim Experiential Religiousness than Islamic women in a more general university, and Muslim Experiential Religiousness also mediated the many other religious differences observed between these two student groups. These data most importantly identified the Muslim Experiential Religiousness Scale as a useful instrument for testing hypotheses about the dynamics of Muslim spirituality.
Abu RaiyaH.PargamentK.I.MahoneyA., & SteinC. (2008). A psychological measure of Muslim religiousness: Development and evidence for reliability and validity. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18, 291–315.
2.
AllportG.W., & RossM.J.Jr. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432–443.
3.
BaronR.M., & KennyD.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
4.
ChenZ.GhorbaniN.WatsonP.J., & AghababaeiN. (In press). Muslim experiential religiousness and Muslim attitudes toward religion: Dissociation of experiential and attitudinal aspects of religiosity in Iran. Studia Religiologica.
5.
CohenS.LamarckT., & MermelsteinR.A. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Psychology, 24, 355–396.
6.
CostelloC.G., & ComreyA.L. (1967). Scales for measuring depression and anxiety. The Journal of Psychology, 66, 303–313.
7.
DienerE.EmmonsR.A.LarsenR.J., & GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
8.
DoverH.MinerM., & DowsonM. (2007). The nature and structure of Muslim religious reflection. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2(2), 189–210.
9.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP.J.AghababaeiN., & ChenZ. (2013). Transliminality and mystical experience: Common thread hypothesis, religious commitment, and psychological adjustment in Iran. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP.J.GhramalekiA.F.MorrisR.J., & HoodR.W.Jr. (2000). Muslim Attitudes towards Religion Scale: Factors, validity, and complexity of relationships with mental health in Iran. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 3, 125–132.
11.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP.J.GeranmayepourS., & ChenZ. (2013a). Development of Muslim Experiential Religiousness Scale in Iran: Relationships with religious orientation, Muslim attitudes toward religion, and psychological adjustment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP.J.GeranmayepourS., & ChenZ. (2013b). Muslim religious experience and attitudes: Predicting religious adjustment and self-determination in Iran. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP.J., & KhanZ. (2007). Theoretical, empirical, and potential ideological dimensions of using Western conceptualizations to measure Muslim religious commitments. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2, 113–131.
14.
GhorbaniN.WatsonP.J.SaeediZ.ChenZ., & SilverC.F. (2012). Religious problem-solving and the complexity of religious rationality within an Iranian Muslim ideological surround. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51, 656–675.
15.
HayesA.F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling.Unpublished white paper.
16.
HuL., & BentlerP.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
17.
Jana-MasriA., & PriesterP.E. (2007). The development and validation of a Qur'an-based instrument to assess Islamic religiosity: The Religiosity of Islam Scale. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2, 177–188.
18.
KhanZ.H., & WatsonP.J. (2006). Factorial complexity and validity of Sahin-Francis Attitude toward Islam Scale among Pakistani university students. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 27(2), 231–235.
19.
KhanZ.H., & WatsonP.J. (2010). Ramadan experience and behavior: Relationships with religious orientation among Pakistani Muslims. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32(2), 149–167.
20.
KhanZ.H.WatsonP.J., & ChenZ. (2011). Differentiating religious coping from Islamic identification in patient and non-patient Pakistani Muslims. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 14(10), 1049–1062.
21.
KhanZ.H.WatsonP.J., & ChenZ. (2012). Islamic religious coping, perceived stress, and mental well-being in Pakistanis. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 34(2), 137–147.
22.
KhanZ.H.WatsonP.J.ChenZ.IftikharA., & JabeenR. (2012). Pakistani religious coping and the experience and behavior of Ramadan. Mental Health, Religion, & Culture, 15(4), 435–446.
23.
KirkpatrickL.A. (1989). A psychometric analysis of the Allport and Ross and Feagin measures of intrinsic and extrinsic religious orientation. In MobergD.O., & LynnM.L. (Eds.), Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion. Vol. 1 (pp. 1–30). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
24.
McDonaldR., & HoM. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.
NasrS.H. (2002). The heart of Islam.San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco.
27.
PargamentK.I. (1997). The psychology of religion and coping.New York: Guilford.
28.
PargamentK.I. (2013). Searching for the sacred: Toward a nonreductionistic theory of spirituality. In PargamentK.I.ExlineJ.J.JonesJ.W. (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 257–273). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.
29.
PiedmontR.L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013.
30.
PiedmontR.L.CiarrochiJ.W.Dy-LiaccoG.S., & WilliamsJ.G. (2009). The empirical and conceptual value of the spiritual transcendence and religious involvement scales for personality research. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(3), 162–179.
31.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image.Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
SahinA., & FrancisL.J. (2002). Assessing attitude toward Islam among Muslim adolescents: The psychometric properties of the Sahin-Francis scale. Muslim Educational Quarterly, 19(4), 35–47.
33.
SobelM.E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In LeinhartS. (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
WatsonP.J. (2010). Christian rationality and the postmodern context: The example of Rational-Emotive Therapy within a Christian ideological surround. Edification: The Transdisciplinary Journal of Christian Psychology, 4(1), 64–74.
35.
WatsonP.J. (2011). Whose psychology? Which rationality? Christian psychology within an ideological surround after postmodernism. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 30, 307–316.
36.
WildeA., & JosephS. (1997). Religiosity and personality in a Moslem context. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(5), 899–900.
