Orthodontic Treatment Modalities: A Qualitative Assessment of Internet Information

Abstract

Objectives

The present study aimed to determine the quality, accuracy, reliability and usability of Internet information, regarding different orthodontic treatment modalities.

Method

Google AdWords identified five popular keywords: Cosmetic braces, fixed braces, Removable braces, Quick braces and risks. These were entered in five search engines, with the resultant websites analysed using five validated assessment tools. Intra-examiner reliability was assessed, descriptive and inferential analysis of the data undertaken.

Results

Good intra-examiner reliability and consistency was observed. A total of 119 websites were included for analysis, with the keywords cosmetic and fixed braces accounting for 55% of identified websites. Invisalign was the most offered treatment (80%). Specialist orthodontists produced the highest, whilst general dentists advertising short-term options produced the lowest quality scoring websites. LIDA provided the most accurate assessment of quality (mean 62.02, SD 7.48). Regression analysis found a significant relationship between author type and a questions and answer sections with both Discern (P < 0.001) and LIDA (P = 0.002) scores, respectively.

Conclusions

Quality of Information regarding orthodontic treatment was variable, with the highest scoring websites were produced by orthodontic specialists and Invisalign the most offered treatment. There is a clear need for valid and reliable websites to better guide patients.

Keywords

Orthodontic treatment Internet quality of information

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldairy

, Laverick

, McIntyre

. 2012. Orthognathic surgery, is patient information on the Internet valid? Eur J Orthod. 34:466–469.

Borgmann

, Mager

, Salem

et al. 2015. Robotic prostatectomy on the Web: a cross-sectional qualitative assessment Clin Genitourin Cancer. 14:e355–e361.

Charnock

, Shepperd

, Needham

, Gann

1999. Discern: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 53:105–111.

Chate

RAC

. 2013. Truth or consequences: the potential implications of short term cosmetic orthodontics for general dental practitioners. Brit Dent J. 215:551–553.

Chestnutt

, Reynolds

2006. Perceptions of how the Internet has impacted on dentistry. Br Dent J. 200:161–165.

Cohen

, Stussman

Health information technology use among men and women aged 18–64: early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January–June 2010.

Eysenbach

2003. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. Cancer J Clin. 53:356–371.

Flesch

RAA

. 1948. New readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol. 32:2221–2233.

Hargrave

, Hargrave

, Bouffet

2006. Quality of health information on the Internet in pediatric neuro-oncology. Neuro Oncol. 8(2):175–182, http://www.helathonnet.org [accessed 2013 Sep] http://www.minervation.com/lida-toolL [accessed 2013 Sep]

10.

Livas

, Delli

, Ren

2013. Quality evaluation of the available Internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 83:500–506.

11.

McMorrow

, Millett

2016. Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of internet information. J Orthod. 43:186–192.

12.

Parekh

, Gill

2014. The quality of orthodontic practice websites. Br Dent J. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.430

13.

Patel

, Cobourne

. 2011. Orthodontic extractions and the Internet: quality of online information available to the public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 139:e103–e109.

14.

Patel

, Cobourne

. 2015. The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking. Eur J Orthod. 37:447–452.

15.

Purcell

2002. The quality of health information on the Internet: as for any other medium it varies widely; regulation is not the answer. Brit Med J. 324(7337):557–558.

16.

Riordain

, McCreary

2009. Dental patient's use of the Internet. Br Dent J. 207:583–586.

17.

Roshan

, Agarwal

, England

. 2008. Role of information available over the Internet: what are the parents of children undergoing tonsillectomy likely to find? Ann Royal College Surg Eng. 90:601–605.

18.

Silberg

, Lundberg

, Mussachio

1997. Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet. J Am Med Assoc. 277(15):1244–1247.