The suppression mechanism of keyhole-induced porosity of oscillating laser beam welding (OLBW) was investigated via numerical simulation with keyhole dynamics and melt flow. The established model was verified by the corresponding experimental results. Results show that the weld porosity of 304 stainless steel can be controlled within 0.6% in OLBW and the large keyhole and well-balanced energy of the melt pool are contributing to porosity reduction. Also, two kinds of porosity suppression mechanisms in OLBW were clarified: first, the stirring effect of the oscillating beam keeps the bubble migration speed is superior in the competition with the solidification rate; second, bubbles can be absorbed timely by the dynamic keyhole when the moving speed of the keyhole reaches 504.6 mm s−1.
LiuT, MuZ, HuR, Sinusoidal oscillating laser welding of 7075 aluminum alloy: hydrodynamics, porosity formation and optimization. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019; 140:346–358.
6.
ChenG, WangB, MaoS, Research on the “∞”-shaped laser scanning welding process for aluminum alloy. Opt Laser Technol. 2019; 115:32–41.
7.
WangL, GaoM, ZhangC, Effect of beam oscillating pattern on weld characterization of laser welding of AA6061-T6 aluminum alloy. Mater Des. 2016; 108:707–717.
8.
ZhouL, WangW, WangX, Effects of laser scanning welding process on porosity rate of aluminum alloy. Trans China Weld Inst. 2014; 35(10):65–68 and 72.
9.
FetzerF, SommerM, WeberR, Reduction of pores by means of laser beam oscillation during remote welding of AlMgSi. Opt Lasers Eng. 2018; 108:68–77.
10.
LinR, WangH-p, LuF, Numerical study of keyhole dynamics and keyhole-induced porosity formation in remote laser welding of Al alloys. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017; 108:244–256.
11.
ChoJ-H, FarsonDF, MilewskiJO, Weld pool flows during initial stages of keyhole formation in laser welding. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2009; 42(17):175502.
12.
ChoJ, FarsonDF, HollisKJ, Numerical analysis of weld pool oscillation in laser welding. J Mech Sci Technol. 2015; 29(4):1715–1722.
13.
PangS, HiranoK, FabbroR, Explanation of penetration depth variation during laser welding under variable ambient pressure. J Laser Appl. 2015; 27(2):022007.
14.
GaoXS, WuCS, GoeckeS-F, Numerical simulation of temperature field, fluid flow and weld bead formation in oscillating single mode laser-GMA hybrid welding. J Mater Process Technol. 2017; 242:147–159.
15.
WangH, ShiY, GongS.Numerical simulation of laser keyhole welding processes based on control volume methods. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2006; 39(21):4722–4730.
16.
LeeJY, KoSH, FarsonDF, Mechanism of keyhole formation and stability in stationary laser welding. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2002; 35(13):1570–1576.
17.
ZhouJ, TsaiHL, LehnhoffTF.Investigation of transport phenomena and defect formation in pulsed laser keyhole welding of zinc-coated steels. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2006; 39(24):5338–5355.
18.
LiX, LuF, CuiH, Numerical modeling on the formation process of keyhole-induced porosity for laser welding steel with T-joint. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2014; 72(1):241–254.
19.
MuZ, ChenX, ZhengZ, Laser cooling arc plasma effect in laser-arc hybrid welding of 316L stainless steel. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019; 132:861–870.
20.
HaoK, LiG, GaoM, Weld formation mechanism of fiber laser oscillating welding of austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol. 2015; 225:77–83.
21.
WangL, LiuY, YangC, Study of porosity suppression in oscillating laser-MIG hybrid welding of AA6082 aluminum alloy. J Mater Process Technol. 2021; 292:117053.
