A comparative study between the ultrasonic attenuation and the nonlinearity is presented for the characterisation of microstructure in large dimension forgings. Results are provided for two austenitic stainless steel forgings of AISI type 304L with a diameter 200 mm, where microscopic observations reveal abnormal grain growth near the surface of one of the forgings. Frequency dependence of the nonlinearity parameter is used to discern variations in grain size in these forgings more precisely than attenuation measurements. The distribution of grain size is shown to have a significant influence on the nonlinearity parameter. Relative changes in the nonlinearity parameter with applied frequency were correlative with the microstructural variations in both the forgings.
MiyaharaNMutohYYamaishiKthe effects of grain size on strength, fracture toughness, and static fatigue crack growth in alumina grain boundary controlled properties of fine ceramics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1992. p. 125–136.
2.
SinczakJMajtaJGlowackiMPrediction of mechanical properties of heavy forgings. J Mater Process Technol.1998; 80–81:166–173.
3.
PrawotoYJasmawatiNSumeruK.Effect of prior austenite grain size on the morphology and mechanical properties of martensite in medium carbon steel. J Mater Sci Technol.2012; 28:461–466.
4.
ShenXYanJZhangLAustenite grain size evolution in railway wheel during multi-stage forging processes. J Iron Steel Res Int.2013; 20:57–65.
5.
BuckinghamRCArgyrakisCHardyMCThe effect of strain distribution on microstructural developments during forging in a newly developed nickel base superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016; 654:317–328.
6.
FigueiredoNCOliveiraCASdMasoumiMMicrostructural variations at different distance from the surface in forged 18 Ni C300 maraging steel. J Mater Res Technol.2019; 8:284–291.
7.
RicciMSenniLBurrascanoPPulse-compression ultrasonic technique for the inspection of forged steel with high attenuation. Insight Non-Destr Test Cond Monit.2012; 54:91–95.
8.
SenniLBattagliniLBurrascanoPIndustrial applications: ultrasonic inspection of large forgings ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 245–258
9.
FendtKTMooshoferHRupitschSJUltrasonic defect characterization in heavy rotor forgings by means of the synthetic aperture focusing technique and optimization methods. IEEE Trans Ultraso Eng. 2016; 63:874–885.
10.
AbrahamSTVenkatramanBRajBApplication of TOFD technique for imaging crack in rod specimens. Mater Eval.2013; 71:411–419.
11.
Dupont-MarilliaFJahaziMLafreniereSDesign and optimisation of a phased array transducer for ultrasonic inspection of large forged steel ingots. NDT E Int. 2019; 103:119–129.
12.
Dupont-MarilliaFJahaziMLafreniereSInfluence of local mechanical parameters on ultrasonic wave propagation in large forged steel Ingots. J Nondestruct Eval.2019; 38:73.
13.
PalanichamyPJosephAJayakumarTUltrasonic velocity measurements for estimation of grain size in austenitic stainless steel. NDT E Int.1995; 28:179–185.
14.
WiskelJBKennedyJIveyDGUltrasonic velocity and attenuation measurements in L80 steel and their correlation with Tensile properties. 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (WCNDT 2016), 13-17 June 2016 in Munich, Germany (WCNDT 2016) [https://www.ndt.net/search/docs.php3?id=19560]. 2016.
15.
VasudevanMPalanichamyP.Characterization of microstructural changes during annealing of cold worked austenitic stainless steel using ultrasonic velocity measurements and correlation with mechanical properties. J Mater Eng Perform.2002; 11:169–179.
16.
PanJHShongSBLiJW.Influence of different forging processes on the ultrasonic response in titanium alloys TC6 and TC11. NDT Int.1990; 23:103–106.
17.
KumarALahaKJayakumarTComprehensive microstructural characterization in modified 9Cr-1Mo ferritic steel by ultrasonic measurements. Metall Mater Trans A. 2002; 33:1617–1626.
18.
DongFWangXYangQIn-situ measurement of Ti-6Al-4V grain size distribution using laser-ultrasonic technique. Scr Mater.2018; 154:40–44.
19.
NagyPB.Fatigue damage assessment by nonlinear materials characterization. Ultrasonics. 1998; 36:375–381.
20.
KimJ-YJacobsLJQuJExperimental characterization of fatigue damage in a nickel-base superalloy using nonlinear ultrasonic waves. J Acoust Soc Am.2006; 120:1266–1273.
21.
BabySNagaraja KowmudiBOmprakashCMCreep damage assessment in titanium alloy using a nonlinear ultrasonic technique. Scr Mater.2008; 59:818–821.
22.
MetyaAGhoshMParidaNHigher harmonic analysis of ultrasonic signal for ageing behaviour study of C-250 grade maraging steel. NDT E Int.2008; 41:484–489.
23.
ChenXJKimJYKurtisKECharacterization of progressive microcracking in Portland cement mortar using nonlinear ultrasonics. NDT E Int.2008; 41:112–118.
24.
ViswanathARaoBPCMahadevanSNondestructive assessment of tensile properties of cold worked AISI type 304 stainless steel using nonlinear ultrasonic technique. J Mater Process Technol.2011; 211:538–544.
25.
AbrahamSTAlbertSKDasCRAssessment of sensitization in AISI 304 stainless steel by nonlinear ultrasonic method. Acta Metall. Sin. Engl Lett.2013; 26:545–552.
26.
DheenadhayalanRVenkatesanAMadhusoodananKDesign of instrumentation for control and safety rod drive mechanisms of prototype fast breeder reactor. Int J Nucl Energy Sci Technol.2013; 7:380.
27.
PapadakisEP.Ultrasonic attenuation caused by scattering in polycrystalline Metals. J Acoust Soc Am.1965; 37:711–717.
28.
ZengFAgnewSRRaeisiniaBUltrasonic attenuation due to grain boundary scattering in pure niobium. J Nondestruct Eval.2010; 29:93–103.
29.
HikataAChickBBElbaumC.Effect of dislocations on finite amplitude ultrasonic waves in aluminum. Appl Phys Lett.1963;
3
:195–197.
30.
MiniRSBalasubramaniamKRavindranP.An experimental investigation on the influence of annealed microstructure on wave propagation. Exp Mech.2015; 55:1023–1030.
31.
AbrahamSTShivaprasadSSreevidyaNA novel multi-frequency nonlinear ultrasonic approach for the characterization of annealed polycrystalline microstructure. Metall Mater Trans A. 2019; 50:5567–5573.
32.
ShirdelMMirzadehHParsaMH.Abnormal grain growth in AISI 304L stainless steel. Mater Charact.2014; 97:11–17.
33.
HumphreysAOHumphreysFJ.The microstructure and microtexture of pure aluminium during recovery. Proc ICAA-4. 1994; 1:211–218.
34.
CheongSWWeilandH.Understanding a microstructure using GOS (grain orientation spread) and its application to recrystallization study of hot deformed Al-Cu-Mg alloys. Mater Sci Forum. 2007; 558–559:153–158.
35.
AlviMHCheongSWWeilandHRecrystallization and texture development in hot rolled 1050 aluminum. Mater Sci Forum. 2004; 467–470:357–362.
36.
RenLNanLYangK.Study of copper precipitation behavior in a Cu-bearing austenitic antibacterial stainless steel. Mater Des.2011; 32:2374–2379.
37.
XiTBabar ShahzadMXuDCopper precipitation behavior and mechanical properties of Cu-bearing 316L austenitic stainless steel: a comprehensive cross-correlation study. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016; 675:243–252.
38.
PapadakisEP.Physical acoustics and microstructure of iron alloys. Int Met Rev.1984; 29:1–24.
39.
PapadakisEP.Revised grain-scattering formulas and tables. J Acoust Soc Am.1965; 37:703–710.
40.
StankeFEKinoGS.A unified theory for elastic wave propagation in polycrystalline materials. J Acoust Soc Am.1984; 75:665.
41.
SmithRL.The effect of grain size distribution on the frequency dependence of the ultrasonic attenuation in polycrystalline materials. Ultrasonics. 1982; 20:211–214.
42.
ArguellesAPTurnerJA.Ultrasonic attenuation of polycrystalline materials with a distribution of grain sizes. J Acoust Soc Am.2017; 141:4347–4353.
43.
BaiXZhaoYMaJGrain-size distribution effects on the attenuation of laser-generated ultrasound in α-titanium alloy. Materials.2019; 12:102.
