A methodology is presented to evaluate martensitic advanced high-strength steels in auto service. There was essentially no influence of hydrogen for (i) linearly increasing stress tests of specimens with hydrogen contents much greater than for automobile service, and (ii) for tensile tests with simultaneous hydrogen charging and with a substantial hydrogen content. These results allow evaluation of the hydrogen influence for the tested steels for auto service. In contrast, electrochemically hydrogen charged martensitic advanced high-strength steels showed an influence of hydrogen on mechanical properties, manifest as (i) a decrease in yield strength, by hydrogen enhanced macroscopic ductility, and (ii) a change of the micro-fracture mode, by hydrogen-assisted micro-fracture.
VenezuelaJ, LiuQ, ZhangM, A review of hydrogen embrittlement of martensitic advanced high strength steels. Corros Rev. 2016;34:153–186. doi: 10.1515/corrrev-2016-0006
2.
LiuQ, ZhouQ, VenezuelaJ, A review of the influence of hydrogen on the mechanical properties of DP, TRIP and TWIP advanced high strength steels for auto construction. Corros Rev. 2016;34:127–152. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.01.032
3.
VenezuelaJ, LiuQ, ZhangMX, The influence of hydrogen on the mechanical and fracture properties of some advanced high strength steels studied using the linearly increasing stress test. Corros Sci. 2015;99:98–117. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.06.038
4.
VenezuelaJ, ZhouQ, LiuQ, Influence of hydrogen on the mechanical and fracture properties of some martensitic advanced high strength steels in simulated service conditions. Corros Sci. 2016;111:602–624. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.05.040
5.
VenezuelaJ, BlanchJ, ZulkiplyA, Further study of the hydrogen embrittlement of martensitic advanced high strength steel in simulated auto service conditions. Corros Sci. 2018;135:120–135. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.02.037
6.
VenezuelaJ, Tapia-BastidasC, ZhouQ, Determination of the equivalent hydrogen fugacity during electrochemical charging of 3.5NiCrMoV steel. Corros Sci. 2018;132:90–106. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.12.018
7.
VenezuelaJ, GreyE, LiuQ, Equivalent hydrogen fugacity during electrochemical charging of some martensitic advanced high-strength steels. Corros Sci. 2017;127:45–58. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.011
8.
VenezuelaJ, ZhouQ, LiuQ, Hydrogen trapping in some automotive martensitic advanced high-strength steels. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20: 1700468. doi: 10.1002/adem.201700468
9.
AtrensA, VenezuelaJ, LiuQ, Electrochemical and mechanical aspects of hydrogen embrittlement evaluation of martensitic steels. In: WandelK, editor. Encyclopedia of interfacial chemistry: surface science and electrochemistry; vol. 6. Amststerdam: Elsevier; 2018. p. 201–225.
10.
LiuQ, ZhouQ, VenezuelaJ, Hydrogen influence on some advanced high-strength steels. Corros Sci. 2017;125:114–138. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.06.012
11.
LiuQ, ZhouQ, VenezuelaJ, The role of microstructure on the influence of hydrogen in some advanced high strength steels. Mater Sci Eng A. 2018;715:370–378. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.079
12.
LiuQ, GreyE, VenezuelaJ, Equivalent hydrogen fugacity during electrochemical charging of 980DP steel determined by thermal desorption spectroscopy. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20:1700469.
13.
LiuQ, ZhouQ, VenezuelaJ, Hydrogen concentration in dual phase (DP) and quenched and partitioned (Q&P) advanced high strength steels (AHSS) under simulated service conditions compared with cathodic charging conditions. Adv Eng Mater. 2016;18:1588–1599. doi: 10.1002/adem.201600217
14.
LiuQ, VenezuelaJ, ZhangM, Hydrogen trapping in some advanced high strength steels. Corros Sci. 2016;111:770–785. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.05.046
15.
LiuQ, AtrensA.Reversible hydrogen trapping in a 3.5NiCrMoV medium strength steel. Corros Sci. 2015;96:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.04.011
16.
LiuQ, AtrensAD, ShiZ, Determination of the hydrogen fugacity during electrolytic charging of steel. Corros Sci. 2014;87:239–258. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.06.033
17.
LiuQ, AtrensA.A critical review of the influence of hydrogen on the mechanical properties of medium strength steels. Corros Rev. 2013;31:85–104. doi: 10.1515/corrrev-2013-0023
18.
LiuQ, IrwantoB, AtrensA.Influence of hydrogen on the mechanical properties of some medium strength Ni-Cr-Mo steels. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;617:200–210. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2014.08.056
19.
LiuQ, IrwantoB, AtrensA.The influence of hydrogen on 3.5NiCrMoV steel studied using the linearly increasing stress test. Corros Sci. 2013;67:193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.10.019
20.
LiuQ, AtrensA.The influence of hydrogen on the low cycle fatigue behavior of medium strength 3.5NiCrMoV steel studied using notched specimens. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20:1700680.
21.
AtrensA, LiuQ, Tapia-BastidasC, Influence of hydrogen on steel components for clean energy. Corros Mater Degrad. 2018;1:1–24. doi: 10.3390/cmd1010002
22.
RamamurthyS, AtrensA.Stress corrosion cracking of high strength steels. Corros Rev. 2013;31:1–31. doi: 10.1515/corrrev-2012-0018
23.
RamamurthyS, LauWML, AtrensA.Influence of applied stress rate on the stress corrosion cracking of 4340 and 3.5NiCrMoV steels under conditions of cathodic hydrogen charging. Corros Sci. 2011;53:2419–2429. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.03.028
24.
RamamurthyS, AtrensA.The influence of applied stress rate on the stress corrosion cracking of 4340 and 3.5NiCrMoV steels in distilled water at 30°C. Corros Sci. 2010;52:1042–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.11.033
25.
RamamurthyS, AtrensA.The stress corrosion cracking of As-quenched 4340 and 3.5NiCrMoV steels under stress rate control in distilled water at 90C. Corros Sci. 1993;34:1385–1402. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(93)90235-9
26.
KinaevNN, CousensDR, AtrensA.The crack tip strain field of AISI 4340 part I measurement technique. J Mater Sci. 1999;34:4909–4920. doi: 10.1023/A:1004747219124
27.
KinaevNN, CousensDR, AtrensA.The crack tip strain field of AISI 4340 part II experimental measurements. J Mater Sci. 1999;34:4921–4929. doi: 10.1023/A:1004799303195
28.
KinaevNN, CousensDR, AtrensA.The crack tip strain field of AISI 4340 part III hydrogen influence. J Mat Sci. 1999;34:4931–4936. doi: 10.1023/A:1004751420033
29.
AtrensA, WangZF.ESEM observations of SCC initiation for 4340 high strength steel in distilled water. J Mat Sci. 1998;33:405–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1004328031430
30.
OehlertA, AtrensA.Environmental assisted fracture for 4340 steel in water and Air of various humidities. J Mat Sci. 1997;32:6519–6523. doi: 10.1023/A:1018659226945
31.
OehlertA, AtrensA.Initiation and propagation of stress corrosion cracking in AISI 4340 and 3.5NiCrMoV rotor steel in constant load tests. Corros Sci. 1996;38:1159–1170. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(96)00010-8
32.
SkogsmoJ, AtrensA.Analytic electron microscopy of grain boundaries in high strength steel. Acta Metall Mater. 1994;42:1139–1146. doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90130-9
33.
RieckRM, AtrensA, SmithIO.The role of crack tip strain rate in the stress corrosion cracking of high strength steels in water. Met Trans. 1989;20A:889–895. doi: 10.1007/BF02651655
34.
HusbyH, IannuzziM, KappesM, Effect of nickel on hydrogen permeation in ferritic/pearlitic low alloy steels. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43:3845–3861. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.174
35.
RogneBRS, KheradmandN, DengY, In situ micromechanical testing in environmental scanning electron microscope: a new insight into hydrogen-assisted cracking. Acta Mater. 2018 ;144:257–268. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.037
36.
DengY.BarnoushA.Hydrogen embrittlement revealed via novel in situ fracture experiments using notched micro-cantilever specimens. Acta Mater. 2018;142:236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.057
37.
HajilouT, DengY, RogneBR, In situ electrochemical microcantilever bending test: a new insight into hydrogen enhanced cracking. Scr Mater. 2017;132:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.01.019
38.
DjukicMB, Sijacki ZeravcicV, BakicGM, Hydrogen damage of steels: a case study and hydrogen embrittlement model. Eng Fail Anal. 2015;58:485–498. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.017
39.
DjukiMB, BakicGM, ZeravcicVS, Towards a unified and practical industrial model for prediction of hydrogen embrittlement and damage in steels. Procedia Struct Integrity. 2016;2:604–611. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.078
40.
DjukicMB, Sijacki ZeravcicV, BakicG, Hydrogen embrittlement of low carbon structural steel. Procedia Mater Sci. 2014;3:1167–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.190
41.
IannuzziM.Environmentally assisted cracking (EAC) in oil and gas production. In: RajaVS, ShojiT, editors. Stress corrosion cracking: theory and practice. Cambridge: Woodhead; 2011. p. 570–607.
42.
LiB, KoyamaM, SakuradaE, Temperature dependence of transgranular fatigue crack resistance in interstitial-free steel and Fe-C steels with supersaturated carbon: effects of dynamic strain aging and dynamic precipitation. Int J Fatigue. 2018;110:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.003
43.
MohammadiA, KoyamaM, GersteinG, Hydrogen-assisted failure in a bimodal twinning-induced plasticity steel: delamination events and damage evolution. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43:2492–2502. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.177
44.
LiB, KoyamaM, HamadaS, Threshold stress intensity factor range of a mechanically-long and microstructually-short crack perpendicular to an interface with plastic mismatch. Eng Fract Mech. 2017;182:287–302. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.07.023
45.
YoshimuraN, UshiodaK, YonemuraM, Effect of the state of carbon on ductility in Fe-0.017mass%C ferritic steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2017;701:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.070
46.
KoyamaM, OnishiY, NoguchiH.Characteristics of hydrogen assisted intergranular fatigue crack growth in interstitial free steel: role of plastic strain localisation. Int J Fract. 2017;206:123–130. doi: 10.1007/s10704-017-0205-3
47.
JemblieL, OldenV, MainconP, Cohesive zone modelling of hydrogen induced cracking on the interface of clad steel pipes. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42:28622–28634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.051
48.
YuH, OlsenJS, OldenV, Cohesive zone simulation of grain size and misorientation effects on hydrogen embrittlement in nickel. Eng Fail Anal. 2017;81:79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.07.027
49.
AlvaroA, JensenI, KheradmandN, Hydrogen embrittlement in nickel, visited by first principles modeling, cohesive zone simulation and nanomechanical testing. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40:16892–16900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.069
50.
DepoverT, VerbekenK.Thermal desorption spectroscopy study of the hydrogen trapping ability of W based precipitates in a Q&T matrix. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43:5760–5769. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.184
51.
DepoverT, VerbekenK.The effect of TiC on the hydrogen induced ductility loss and trapping behavior of Fe-C-Ti alloys. Corros Sci. 2016;112:308–326. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.07.013
52.
DepoverT, VerbekenK.Evaluation of the effect of V4C3 precipitates on the hydrogen induced mechanical degradation in Fe-C-V alloys. Mat Sci Eng A. 2016;675:299–313. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.053
53.
DepoverT, VerbekenK.Evaluation of the role of Mo2C in hydrogen induced ductility loss in Q&T FeCMo alloys. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2016;41:14310–14329. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.176
54.
DepoverT, VerbekenK.Hydrogen trapping and hydrogen induced mechanical degradation in lab cast Fe-C-Cr alloys. Mat Sci Eng A. 2016;669:134–149. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.018
55.
DepoverT, VerbekenK.Hydrogen induced mechanical degradation in tungsten alloyed steels. Mater Charact. 2018;136:84–93. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.12.017
56.
FanYH, ZhangB, YiHL, The role of reversed austenite in hydrogen embrittlement fracture of S41500 martensitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2017;139:188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.011
57.
ZafraA, PeralLB, BelzunceJ, Effect of hydrogen of on the tensile properties of 42CrMo4 steel quenched and tempered at different temperatures. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2018;43:9068–9082. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.158
58.
ShinDH, LeeT, LeeJ, Increased resistance to hydrogen embrittlement in high-strength steels composed of granular bainite. Mater Sci Eng A;2018;700:473–480. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.043
59.
GarcíaTE., ArroyoB, RodríguezC, Small punch test methodologies for the analysis of the hydrogen embrittlement of structural steels. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 2016;86A:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.09.005
60.
SanchezJ, LeeSF, Martin-RengelMA, Measurement of hydrogen and embrittlement of high strength steels. Eng Fail Anal. 2016;59:467–477. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.001
61.
IchiiK, KoyamaM, TasanCC, Comparative study of hydrogen embrittlement in stable and metastable high-entropy alloys. Scr Mater. 2018;150:74–77. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.03.003
62.
DjukicMB, BakicGM, Sijacki ZeravcicV, Hydrogen embrittlement of industrial components: prediction, prevention, and models. Corrosion. 2016;72:943–961. doi: 10.5006/1958
63.
PopovBN, LeeJ-W, DjukicMB.Chapter 7: Hydrogen permeation and hydrogen induced cracking. In: KutzM, editor. Handbook of environmental degradation of materials. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018. p. 133–163.
64.
IannuzziM, BarnoushA, JohnsenR.Materials and corrosion trends in offshore and subsea oil and gas production. Mater Degrad. 2017;1. Article number: 2.
65.
BarnoushA, YangB.VehoffH.Effect of hydrogen and grain boundaries on dislocation nucleation and multiplication examined with a NI-AFM. Adv Solid State Phys. 2008;47:253–269. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74325-5_20
66.
KoyamaM, AkiyamaE, LeeY-K, Overview of hydrogen embrittlement in high-Mn steels. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42:12706–12723. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.214
67.
KoyamaM, RohwerderM, TasanCC, Recent progress in microstructural hydrogen mapping in steels: quantification, kinetic analysis, and multi-scale characterisation. Mater Sci Technol. 2017;33:1481–1496. doi: 10.1080/02670836.2017.1299276
68.
JemblieL, OldenV, AkselsenOM.A review of cohesive zone modelling as an approach for numerically assessing hydrogen embrittlement of steel structures. Philos Trans Royal Soc A. 2017;375:20160411. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0411
69.
IannuzziM.Chapter 15: Environmentally assisted cracking (EAC). In: RajaVS, ShojiT, editors. Oil and gas production in stress corrosion cracking: theory and practice. Cambridge: Woodhead; 2011. p. 570–607.
70.
MyersS, BaskesM, BirnbaumH, Hydrogen interactions with defects in crystalline solids. Rev Mod Phys. 1992;64:559–617. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.64.559
71.
SerebrinskyA, CarterEA, OrtizM.A quantum-mechanically informed continuum model of hydrogen embrittlement. J Mech Phys Solids. 2004;52(52):2403–2430. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.02.010
72.
LynchS.Hydrogen embrittlement phenomena and mechanisms. Corros Rev. 2012;30:105–123.
73.
PundtA, KirchheimR.Hydrogen in metals: microstructural aspects. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2006;36:555–608. doi: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.36.090804.094451
74.
BhadeshiaHK.Prevention of hydrogen embrittlement in steels. ISIJ Int. 2016;56:24–36. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2015-430
75.
RobertsonIM, SofronisP, NagaoA, Hydrogen embrittlement understood. Metall Mater Trans B. 2015;46:1085–1103. doi: 10.1007/s11663-015-0325-y
76.
SongJ, CurtinWA.Atomic mechanism and prediction of hydrogen embrittlement in iron. Nat Mater. 2013;12:145–151. doi: 10.1038/nmat3479
DadfarniaM, NagaoA, WangS, Recent advances on hydrogen embrittlement of structural materials. Int J Fract. 2015;196:223–243. doi: 10.1007/s10704-015-0068-4
79.
NagaoA, DadfarniaM, SomerdayBP, Hydrogen-enhanced-plasticity mediated decohesion for hydrogen-induced intergranular and “quasi-cleavage” fracture of lath martensitic steels. J Mech Phys Solids. 2018;112:403–430. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2017.12.016
80.
NagaoA, SmithCD, DadfarniaM, The role of hydrogen in hydrogen embrittlement fracture of lath martensitic steel. Acta Mater. 2012;60:5182–5189. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.040
81.
BarreraO, BombacD, ChenY, Understanding and mitigating hydrogen embrittlement of steels: a review of experimental, modelling and design progress from atomistic to continuum. J Mater Sci. 2018;53:6251–6290. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1978-5
82.
KatzY, TymiakN, GerberichWW.Nanomechanical probes as new approaches to hydrogen/deformation interaction studies. Eng Fract Mech. 2001;68:619–646. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00119-3
83.
NagumoM.Hydrogen related failure of steels – a new aspect. Mater Sci Technol. 2004;20:940–950. doi: 10.1179/026708304225019687
84.
Pérez EscobarD, DuprezL, AtrensA, Thermal desorption spectroscopy study of experimental Ti/S containing steels. Mater Sci Technol. 2013;29:261–267. doi: 10.1179/1743284712Y.0000000141
85.
Pérez EscobarD, WallaertE, DuprezL, Thermal desorption spectroscopy study of the interaction of hydrogen with TiC precipitates. Met Mater Int. 2013;19:741–748. doi: 10.1007/s12540-013-4013-7
86.
Pérez EscobarD, DuprezL, AtrensA, Influence of experimental parameters on thermal desorption spectroscopy measurements during evaluation of hydrogen trapping. J Nucl Mater. 2014;450:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.07.006
87.
ZhaoMC, LiuM, AtrensA, Effect of applied stress and microstructure on sulfide stress cracking resistance of pipeline steels subject to hydrogen sulfide. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;478:43–47. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.067
88.
AtrensA.Service performance of engineering materials. J Mater Sci Technol. 2005;21(1):81–85.
89.
DietzelW, AtrensA, BarnoushA.Mechanics of modern test methods and quantitative-accelerated testing for hydrogen embrittlement. In: GangloffRP, SomerdayBP, editors. Gaseous hydrogen embrittlement of materials in energy technologies. Cambridge: Woodhead; 2011. p. 237–273.
90.
SongRG, BlawertC, DietzelW, A study of the stress corrosion cracking and hydrogen embrittlement of AZ31 magnesium alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;399:308–317. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.04.003
91.
OotsukaS, FujitaS, TadaE, Evaluation of hydrogen absorption into steel in automobile moving environments. Corros Sci. 2015;98:430–437. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.05.049
92.
Anonymous. Corrosion in the automotive industry. In: KorbLK, editor. Metals handbook. 9th ed., vol. 13: Corrosion. Metals Park ( OH): ASM International; 1987. p. 1011–1018.
93.
JonesDA.Principles and prevention of corrosion. Upper Saddle River ( NY): Prentice Hall; 1996.
94.
AtrensA, BrosnanCC, RamamurthyS, Linearly increasing stress test (LIST) for SCC research. Meas Sci Technol. 1993;4:1281–1292. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/4/11/017
95.
VillalbaE, AtrensA.Metallurgical aspects of rock bolt stress corrosion cracking. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;491:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.086
96.
VillalbaE, AtrensA.SCC of commercial steels exposed to high hydrogen fugacity. Eng Fail Anal. 2008;15:617–641. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.10.004
97.
VillalbaE, AtrensA.An evaluation of steels subjected to rock bolt SCC conditions. Eng Fail Anal. 2007;14:1351–1393. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.11.006
CaoF, ShiZ, SongG-L, Stress corrosion cracking of several Hot-rolled Mg-X alloys. Corros Sci. 2015;98:6–19. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.04.023
100.
CaoF, ShiZ, SongG-L, Stress corrosion cracking of several solution heat-treated Mg-X alloys. Corros Sci. 2015;96:121–132. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.04.010
101.
ShiZ, HofstetterJ, CaoF, Corrosion and stress corrosion cracking of ultra-high-purity Mg5Zn. Corros Sci. 2015;93:330–335. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.01.032
102.
WinzerN, AtrensA, DietzelW, The fractography of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of Mg-Al alloys. Metall Mater Trans A. 2008;39:1157. doi: 10.1007/s11661-008-9475-8
103.
WinzerN, AtrensA, DietzelW, Characterisation of stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of Mg-Al alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;488:339–351. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.064
104.
WinzerN, AtrensA, DietzelW, Comparison of the linearly increasing stress test and the constant extension rate test in the evaluation of transgranular stress corrosion cracking of magnesium. Mater Sci Eng A. 2008;472:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.021
105.
WinzerN, AtrensA, DietzelW, Magnesium stress corrosion cracking. T Nonferr Metal Soc. 2007;17:S150–S155.
106.
WinzerN, AtrensA, DietzelW, Stress corrosion cracking in magnesium alloys: characterisation and prevention. JOM. 2007;59(8):49–53. doi: 10.1007/s11837-007-0104-6
107.
GamboaE, AtrensA.Material influence on the stress corrosion cracking of rock bolts. Eng Fail Anal. 2005;12:201–225. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.07.002
108.
GamboaE, AtrensA.Environmental influence on the stress corrosion cracking of rock bolts. Eng Fail Anal. 2003;10:521–558. doi: 10.1016/S1350-6307(03)00036-0
109.
GamboaE, AtrensA.Stress corrosion cracking fracture mechanisms in rock bolts. J Mater Sci. 2003;38:3813–3829. doi: 10.1023/A:1025996620197
110.
WangJ, AtrensA.SCC initiation for X65 pipeline steel in “high” pH carbonate / bicarbonate solution. Corros Sci. 2003;45:2199–2217. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(03)00044-1
111.
WangJ, AtrensA.Microstructure and grain boundary microanalysis of X70 pipeline steel. J Mater Sci. 2003;38:323–330. doi: 10.1023/A:1021169700779
112.
WangJQ, AtrensA, CousensDR.Boundary characterisation of X65 pipeline steel using analytical electron microscopy. J Mater Sci. 1999;34:1711–1719. doi: 10.1023/A:1004530420338
113.
WangJQ, AtrensA, CousensDR, Microstructure of X52 and X65 pipeline steels. J Mater Sci. 1999;34:1721–1728. doi: 10.1023/A:1004538604409
114.
WangJQ, AtrensA, CousensDR, Measurement of grain boundary composition for X52 pipeline steel. Acta Mater. 1998;46:5677–5687. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00246-8
115.
WangJQ, AtrensA.Analysis of service stress corrosion cracking in a natural gas transmission pipeline, active or dormant?Eng Fail Anal. 2004;11:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2003.08.001
116.
WangZF, AtrensA.Initiation of stress corrosion cracking for pipeline steels in a carbonate-bicarbonate solution. Metall Mater Trans. 1996;27A:2686–2691. doi: 10.1007/BF02652362
117.
AtrensA, OehlertA.Linearly increasing stress test (LIST) of carbon steel in 4N NaNO3 and in Bayer liquor. J Mater Sci. 1998;33:783–788. doi: 10.1023/A:1004314517742
118.
OehlertA, AtrensA.SCC propagation in AerMet 100. J Mater Sci. 1998;33:775–781. doi: 10.1023/A:1004362400904
119.
SalmondJ, AtrensA.SCC of copper using the linearly increasing stress test. Scr Metall Mater.1992;26:1447–1450. doi: 10.1016/0956-716X(92)90664-Z
120.
BhadeshiaH, HoneycombeR.Steels: microstructure and properties. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006.
121.
WeastRC, editor. Handbook of chemistry and physics. Cleveland ( OH): CRC; 1967.
122.
MarcusP, editor. Corrosion mechanisms in theory and practice. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2002.
123.
BockrisJ, ReddyA.Modern electrochemistry. New York: Plenum Press; 1970.
124.
DevanathanMAV, StachursckiZ.The adsorption and diffusion of electrolytic hydrogen in palladium. Proc Roy Soc London A Math Phys Sci. 1962;270:90–102. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1962.0205
125.
PourbaixM.Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions. Houston: NACE; 1974.
126.
FlisJ, ZakroczymskiT, KleshnyaV, Changes in hydrogen entry rate and in surface of iron during cathodic polarisation in alkaline solutions. Electrochim Acta. 1999;44:3989–3997. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(99)00168-1
127.
ZakroczymskiT.Adaptation of the electrochemical permeation technique for studying entry, transport and trapping of hydrogen in metals. Electrochim Acta. 2006;51:2261–2266. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.151
128.
OwczarekE, ZakroczymskiT.Hydrogen transport in a duplex stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2000;48:3059–3070. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00122-1
129.
McBreenJ, NonisL, BeckW.A method for determination of the permeation rate of hydrogen through metal membranes. J Electrochem. Soc. 1966;113:1218–1222. doi: 10.1149/1.3087209
130.
AtrensA, MezzanotteD, FioreNF, Electrochemical studies of hydrogen diffusion and permeability in Ni. Corros Sci. 1980;20:673–684. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(80)90102-X
131.
BockrisJOM, SubramanyanPK.The equivalent pressure of molecular hydrogen in cavities within metals in terms of the overpotential developed during the evolution of hydrogen. Electrochim Acta. 1971;16:2169–2179. doi: 10.1016/0013-4686(71)85027-2
