Laser Technologies in Toxicopathology

Abstract

One of the main concepts in toxicology and risk assessment is the identification of compound s with the least toxicity, gaining increased understanding of the underlying mechanisms of efficacy and toxicity so as to accelerate the early selection of compound s for development. For this purpose, “cuttingedge” technologies, such as flow cytometry (FC), laser scanning cytometry (LSC) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), have proved to be valuable tools. FC, LSC and CLSM have been successfully applied in a wide range of areas within toxicology and research including genetics, reproduction, dermatology, pathology and target organ toxicity. The scope of this paper is to give a short overview of the usefulness of the different laser applications. Specific examples of the impact of these technologies will be presented or can be found in the references. Flow cytometry methods have been successfully applied in immunophenotyping, micronuclei scoring, polyploidy determination, apoptosis and cell cycle evaluation, cell proliferation and quantification. A three-parameter FC method for the analysis of testicular toxicity has also been established as an alternative to traditional histopathological methods. This method allows a large number of cells to be analysed in a short time and provides quantitative values to evaluate testicular damage in the rat. Laser scanning cytometry has been used in our unit for rat blood cell immunophenotyping, tumor proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle analysis on minipig and rat skin and cardiac cells identification. The wide range of applications that can be applied with the LSC shows the enormous potential of this technology in research and development. Confocal laser scanning microscope was used in our laboratory, in collaboration with the research department, to investigate the mechanisms underlying hepatic lesions found in dogs, to detect fibrinogen influx into rat lung, to explore the mechanism of eye toxicity and to quantify dopaminergic fibers in brain sections. Integrating these technologies within discovery pathology allowed us to understand disease processes with respect to their development and subsequent consequences. It contributes to descriptive pathologic diagnostic and allows a productive interaction with research and development. These technologies offer a range of novel applications and have been shown to be useful tools in terms of specificity, sensitivity, reliability, rapidity and quantification. Expertise in cutting-edge technologies, pathology and cell and molecular biology is essential to a successful and flexible interaction across all therapeutic areas in drug discovery.

Keywords

Flow cytometry laser scanning cytometry confocal laser scanning microscope.

References

BednerE. , Burfeind P. , Gorczyca W. , Melamed MR , DarzynkiewiczZ. (1997). Laser scanning cytometry distinguishes lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes by differences in their chromatin structure. Cytometry 29: 191—196.

Clatch RJ , Foreman JR , Walloch JL (1998). Simplified immunophenotypi c analysis by laser scanning cytometry. Cytometry 34: 3—16.

Sasaki K. , Kurose A. , Miura Y. , Sato T. , Ikeda E. (1996). DNA ploidy analysis by laser scanning cytometry (LSC) in colorectal cancers and comparison with flow cytometry. Cytometry 23: 106—109.

Darzynkiewicz Z. , Traganos F. (1998). Measurement of apoptosis . Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 62: 33—73.

Darzynkiewicz Z. , Bedner E. , Li X. , Gorczyca W. , Melamed MR (1999). Laser-scanning cytometry: A new instrumentation with many applications. Experimental Cell Research 249: 1—12.

Glade CP , Seegers, Bampa , Meulen EFJ , van Hooijddonk Caem , van Erp PEJ , van de Kerkhof PCM (1996). Multiparameter flow cytometric characterization of epidermal cell suspensions prepared from normal and hyperproliferative human skin using an optimized thermolysin-trypsin protocol. Arch Dermatol Res 288: 203—210.

Kamentsky LA , Kamentsky LD (1991). Microscope-based multiparameter laser scanning cytometry yielding data comparable to flow cytometry data. Cytometry 12: 381—387.

Kamentsky LA , Burger DE , Gershman RJ , Kamentsky LD , Luther E. (1997). Slide-based laser scanning cytometry. Acta cytol 41: 123—143.

Luther E. , Kamentsky LA (1996). Resolution of mitotic cells using laser scanning cytometry. Cytometry 23: 272—278.

10.

Medina J. , Roman D. , Garcia GarayoaE , Bobadilla M. , Suter W. , deFraisinette A. (1998). Apoptosi s induction by anti-proliferative drugs on human HaCaT keratinocytes. J Invest Derm 110: 552.

11.

Medina J. , Chibout S-D. , Cordier A. , Kolopp M. , Mahl A. , Roman D. , Vogel B. , Meingassner J. , de Brugerolle de Fraissinette A. LAV694, a new tubulin polymerisation inhibitor for topical treatment of actinic keratosis, shows a markedly improved tolerability . J Invest Derm (submitted).

12.

Pawley JB (1995). Handbook of biological confocal microscopy, second edition, Plenum Press, New York.

13.

Roman D. , Bobadilla M. (1998). Flow cytometry as a valuable tool in toxicology . Tox letters 95(suppl 1): 198.

14.

Roman D. , Locher F. , Suter W. , Cordier A. , Bobadilla M. (1998). Evaluation of a new procedure for the flow cytometric analysis of in vitro; chemically induced micronuclei in V79 cells. Environ Mol Mut 32: 387—396.

15.

Roman D. , deBrugerolle-deFraisinette A. , Greiner B. , Marty J. , Vogel B. , Kolopp M. , Cordier A. , Van Cauteren H. , Bobadilla M. (1999). Laser scanning cytometry (LSC): a new tool in toxicology. Tox letters suppl 1: 100.

16.

Roman D. , deBrugerolle-deFraisinette A. , Greiner B. , Bobadilla M. (2000). Application of laser scanning cytometry (LSC) in toxicological testing. Cytometry suppl 10: 96.

17.

Shapiro HM (1995). Practical flow cytometry, third edition, Wiley-Liss, Inc, New York.

18.

Suter L. , Koch E. , Bechter R. , Bobadilla M. (1997). Three-parameter flow cytometric analysis of rat spermatogenesis. Cytometry 27: 161—168.

19.

SuterL. , BobadillaM. , KochE. , Bechter R. (1997). Flow cytometric evaluation of the effects of doxorubicin on rat spermatogenesis. Repro Tox 11: 521— 531.

20.

Suter L. , Clemann N. , Koch E. , Bobadilla M. , Bechter R. (1998). New and traditional approaches for the assessment of testicular toxicity. Repro Tox 12: 39—47.