Introduction
Under the conditions of major cerebral arterial stenosis, increased OEF is reported to play an important role as a major risk factor for cerebral infarction and return to normal after revascularization therapy. Consequently, measurement of OEF and CMRO2 is useful for determination of indication for revascularization therapy. However, anatomical constitution of the OEF images, which were generated by the calculation using CBF images, was not so clear as those of the CBF images, which were directly generated by kinetic analysis of dynamic PET data and arterial input functions. Therefore, the results of the conventional ROI (region of interest)analysis of the OEF and CMRO2 images had serious problems in the objectivity and reproducibility. We already established the automated constant ROI analysis software for the cerebral gray matter named “FineSRT”. In this study we tried to estimate OEF and CMRO2 images of the normal volunteers using FineSRT.
Materials and methods
Nine healthy volunteers (age range 44−58 years, mean 51. 8 years, 9 men) were enrolled. The parametric images of CBF, OEF and CMRO2 were calculated according to the method of autoradiography. Using FineSRT, the OEF and CMRO2 images of each subject were anatomically standardized first with the same moving parameters determined by the CBF image and CBF PET template image under SPM99 algorithm. The standardized images were consequently analyzed using the constant ROI template, which was composed of 1394 ROIs grouped into 41 areas corresponding to respective cerebral convolutions as shown in the Table, and area-weighted mean value for each of the 41 areas based on the PET count in each ROI were calculated. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the respective area-weighted mean OEF, CMRO2 and CBF values of all subjects' 41 areas were calculated and compared.
Results
Significant correlation was expectedly not shown between OEF and CBF values (Figure 1; r=0. 038, R2=0.001) but between CMRO2 and CBF (Figure 2; r=0.908, R2=0.825). As shown in the Table, the mean and SD of 41 OEF values were 42.56± 3.27 mL/100gr/min (range 31.64–46.68), and OEF values of the caudate tail (31.64), the hippocampus (35.75), the amygdaloid body (34.82) and the thalamus (37.34) were conspicuously lower than those of the other areas.

Scatter plot of CBF as measured by OEF

Scatter plot of CBF as measured by CMR O2
Conclusion
FineSRT enables objective quantification of each cerebral gyrus of PET images. The normal OEF values of almost all gyri were observed around 42.56 irrespective of their CBF values, but lower threshold was needed for the evaluation of caudate tail, hippocampus, amygdaloid body and thalamus.
Mean and SD of the nine volunteers' area-weighted average of OEF, CMRO2 and CBF
