Which executive profiles currently govern the construction value chain? Addressing this lively research question is the key point of our article and it appears central to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers interested in project management in general, and construction and real estate in particular. For this reason, we draw from Upper Echelons Theory in studying the executive profiles of 109 important firms currently active in Italy. Our statistical analysis shows that, although homogeneity substantially regards the executive's gender, age, and level of education, heterogeneity is associated more with his or her functional background. We thus prospect some conceptual and methodological avenues for further analyses in this challenging area of research.
AbatecolaG. (2014). Research in organizational evolution: What comes next?European Management Journal, 32(3), 434–443.
2.
AbatecolaG., BelussiF., BreslinD., & FilatotchevI. (2015). Darwinism, organizational evolution and survival: Key challenges for future research.Journal of Management and Governance. doi: 10.1007/s10997-015-9310-8
3.
AbatecolaG., & CristofaroM. (2015). Caratteristiche socio-demografiche e competenze distintive nella governance dei player immobiliari in Italia. Un'analisi comparativa. In CafferataR. (Ed.), Real Estate. Tendenze evolutive del settore (pp. 71–101). Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
4.
AbatecolaG., MandarelliG., & PoggesiS. (2013). The personality factor: How top management teams make decisions: A literature review.Journal of Management and Governance, 17(4), 1073–1100.
5.
BarnardC. I. (1938). The functions of the executive.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BoekerW., & WiltbankR. (2005). New venture evolution and managerial capabilities.Organization Science, 16(2), 123–133.
7.
BooneC., van OlffenW., van WitteloostuijnA., & de BrabanderB. (2004). The genesis of top management team diversity: Selective turnover among top management teams in Dutch newspaper publishing.Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 633–656.
8.
BreslinD. (2015). What evolves in organizational co-evolution?Journal of Management and Governance. doi: 10.1007/s10997-014-9302-0
9.
CafferataR. (2014a). Darwinist connections between the systemness of social organizations and their evolution.Journal of Management and Governance. doi: 10.1007/s10997-014-9303-z
10.
CafferataR. (2014b). Management in adattamento: Tra razionalità economica, evoluzione e imperfezione dei sistemi.Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
CarpenterM. A. (Ed.). (2011). The handbook of research on top management teams.Cambridge, MA: Edward Elgar.
13.
ChildJ. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice.Sociology, 6(1), 1–22.
14.
ChildJ., RodriguesS. B., & TseK. K. T. (2012). The dynamics of influence in corporate co-evolution.Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1246–1273.
15.
Chuing LooS., Abdul-RahmanH., & WangC. (2013). Managing external risks for international architectural, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms operating in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states.Project Management Journal, 44(5), 70–88.
16.
CohenY., OrnoyH., & KerenB. (2013). MBTI personality types of project managers and their success: A field survey.Project Management Journal, 44(3), 78–87.
17.
CreasyT., & AnantatmulaV. S. (2013). From every direction: How personality traits and dimensions of project managers can conceptually affect project success.Project Management Journal, 44(6), 36–51.
18.
CyertR. M., & MarchJ. G. (1963). A behavioural theory of the firm.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
DengX., PhengL. S., & ZhaoX. (2014). Project system vulnerability to political risks in international construction projects: The case of Chinese contractors.Project Management Journal, 45(2), 20–33.
20.
De VitaL., MariM., & PoggesiS. (2014). Women entrepreneurs in and from developing countries: Evidences from the literature.European Management Journal, 32(3), 451–460.
21.
ErrastiA., BeachR., OduozaC., & ApaolazaU. (2009). Close coupling value chain functions to improve subcontractor manufacturing performance.International Journal of Project Management, 27, 261–269.
22.
Expo Italy Real Estate (2013, June). Yearbook of the Italian real estate (4th ed.). Milan, Italy: Giornalisti Associati.
23.
FinkelsteinS. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation.Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 505–538.
24.
FinkelsteinS., HambrickD. C., & CannellaA. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25.
GonzálesG. E. G., CasasG. H. P., & CoronadoC. A. L. (2013). Project manager profile characterization in the construction sector in Bogotá.Project Management Journal, 44(6), 68–93.
26.
GriceJ. W., & IwasakiM. (2007). A truly multivariate approach to Manova.Applied Multivariate Research, 12(3), 199–226.
27.
GrijalvaE., & HarmsP. D. (2014). Narcissism: An integrative synthesis and dominance complementarity model.Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 108–127.
28.
HambrickD. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update.Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343.
29.
HambrickD. C., & FinkelsteinS. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes.Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 369–406.
30.
HambrickD. C., & MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers.Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
31.
JaafarM., OthmanR., & JalaliA. (2014). Main determinations of female entrepreneurs in the construction industry in Malaysia.Project Management Journal, 45(1), 76–86.
32.
JensenM., & ZajacE. J. (2004). Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm.Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 507–524.
33.
LevinthalD. A., & MarinoA. (2015). Three facets of organizational adaptation. Selection, variety, and plasticity.Organization Science, 26(3), 743–755.
34.
LindebaumD., & CassellC. (2012). A contradiction in terms? Making sense of emotional intelligence in a construction management envinronment.British Journal of Management, 23(1), 65–79.
35.
MarchJ., & SimonH. A. (1958). Organizations.New York, NY: Wiley.
36.
MartekI., & ChenC. (2013). Localization typologies evident among foreign enterprises active in the Chinese construction market.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(10), 04013001.
37.
MurmannJ. P. (2013). The co-evolution of industries and important features of their environments.Organization Science, 24, 58–78.
38.
MusteenM., BarkerV. L.III, & BaetenV. L. (2006). CEO attributes associated with attitude toward change: The direct and moderating effects of CEO tenure.Journal of Business Research, 59(5), 604–612.
39.
NielsenS. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies.International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 301–316.
40.
NoteboomB. (2007). Service value chains and effects of scale (Discussion Paper 3). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
41.
OladinrinT. O., & HoC. M. (2014). Strategies for improving codes of ethics implementation in construction organizations.Project Management Journal, 45(5), 15–26.
42.
PiconeP. M., DagninoG. B., & MinàA. (2014). The origin of failure: A multidimensional appraisal of the hubris hypothesis and proposed research agenda.Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 447–468.
43.
QuigleyT. J., & HambrickD. C. (2015). Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America's attention to corporate leaders.Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 821–830.
44.
RoseT. M., & ManleyK. (2010). Financial incentives and advanced construction procurement systems.Project Management Journal, 41(1), 40–50.
45.
SimonH. A. (1947). Administrative behaviour.New York, NY: Macmillan.
46.
SimsekZ. (2007). CEO tenure and organizational performance: An intervening model.Strategic Management Journal, 28(6), 653–662.
47.
SquicciariniM., & AsikainenA. L. (2011). A value chain statistical definition of construction and the performance of the sector.Construction Management and Economics, 29, 671–693.
48.
TorchiaM., CalabròA., & HuseM. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From Tokenism to critical mass.Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.
49.
van DrielH., VolberdaH. W., EikelboomS., & KamerbeekE. (2015). A co-evolutionary analysis of longevity: Pakhoed and its predecessors.Business History, 57(8), 1277–1305.
50.
WangH., WaldmanD. A., & ZhangH. (2012). Strategic leadership across cultures: Current findings and future research directions.Journal of World Business, 47(4), 571–580.
51.
WangrowD. B., SchepkerD. J., & BarkerV. L.III (2015). Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research directions.Journal of Management, 41(1), 99–135.
52.
WeickK. E. (1969). The social psychology of organizing.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
53.
YamakS., NielsenS., & Escribá-EsteveA. (2014). The role of external environment in upper echelons theory: A review of existing literature and future research directions.Group & Organization Management, 39(1), 69–109.
54.
YitmenI. (2013). Organizational cultural intelligence: A competitive capability for strategic alliances in the international construction industry.Project Management Journal, 44(4), 5–25.
55.
YoungG. J., CharnsM. P., & ShortellS. M. (2001). Top manager and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: A study of TQM in a public hospital system.Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 935–951.
56.
YousefiS., HipelK. W., & HegazyT. (2010). Attitude-based strategic negotiation for conflict management in construction projects.Project Management Journal, 41(4), 99–107.
57.
YuanH. (2013). Critical management measures contributing to construction waste management: Evidence from construction projects in China.Project Management Journal, 44(4), 101–112.
