The centre of interest of this research article is the association between chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics and firm performance. Employing a sample of Nifty 500 firms, the support found recommends that demographic and job-related characteristics may be related with the firm’s financial performance. We consider CEO gender, duality, nationality, remuneration and education level as CEO characteristics and we employ return on assets (ROA) as a representative for firm performance. This study widens the understanding of the important function played by the CEO and provides better insight into CEO-specific variables. Specifically, the reported findings specify a positive relationship between CEO remuneration and firm performance, thus indicating that compensation acts as a good inducement for executives to yield finer firm performance while CEO nationality appears to inhibit it, steering foreign directors to a minority spot. This implies that remuneration should be more thoughtfully attached to performance, so that proficient CEOs are not lured by more tempted compensation elsewhere and the decision to engage foreign nationals to company boards must be based on norms other than the firm’s future financial performance.
AdamsR. B.SantosJ. A. C. (2006). Identifying the effect of managerial control on firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(1–2), 55–85. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.08.001
2.
AldrichH. (1979). Organisations and environments.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
AmranN. A. (2011). The effect of owner’s gender and age to firm performance: A review on Malaysian public listed family businesses. Journal of Global Business and Economics, 2(1), 104–116.
4.
AmranN. A.YusofM. A. M.IshakR.AripinN. (2014). Do characteristics of CEO and chairman influence government-linked companies performance? Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 799–803. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.546
5.
BadruB. O.RajiJ. O. (2016). Companies’ financial outcomes in Nigeria: Does chief executive officer nationality matter? Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 11(4), 42.
6.
BarkerV.L.MuellerG. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science, 48(6), 782–801.
7.
BarneyJ. B. (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(4), 49–61. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1995.9512032192
8.
BeattyR. P.ZajacE. J. (1987). CEO change and firm performance in large corporations: Succession effects and manager effects. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 305–317.
9.
BeckerC. L.DefondM. L.JiambalvoJ.SubramanyamK. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
10.
BhagatS.BoltonB. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257–273. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006
11.
BhagatS.BoltonB.SubramanianA. (2010). CEO education, CEO turnover, and firm performance. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1670219#
12.
BrickI. E.PalmonO.WaldJ. K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403–423. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.08.005
13.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Harper and Row Publishers.
14.
CatonG. L.GohJ.DonaldsonJ. (2001). The effectiveness of institutional activism. Financial Analysts Journal, 57(4), 21–26.
15.
ChenZ.CheungY.-L.StouraitisA.WongA. W. S. (2005). Ownership concentration, firm performance, and dividend policy in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(4), 431–449. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.12.001
16.
CoreJ. E.HolthausenR. W.LarckerD. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406.
17.
CuiH. C.MakY. T. (2002). The relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in high R&D firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(4), 313–336.
18.
DailyC. M.JohnsonJ. L. (1997). Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management, 23(2), 97–117.
19.
DonaldsonL.DavisJ. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
20.
DragoniL.OhI. S.VankatwykP.TeslukP. E. (2011). Developing executive leaders: The relative contribution of cognitive ability, personality, and the accumulation of work experience in predicting strategic thinking competency. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 829–864.
21.
ElsayedK. (2007). Does CEO duality really affect corporate performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1203–1214. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00641.x
22.
ElsharkawyM.PatersonA. S.SherifM. (2018). Now you see me: Diversity, CEO education, and bank performance in the UK. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 15(1), 277–291. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15 (1).2018.23
23.
FaragH.MallinC. (2018). The influence of CEO demographic characteristics on corporate risk-taking: Evidence from Chinese IPOs. The European Journal of Finance, 24(16), 1528–1551.
24.
FeltonR. (2004). A new era in corporate governance. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 28–41.
25.
FinkelsteinS.D’AveniR. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079–1108.
26.
GalbraithJ. K. (1984). The affluent society.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
García-MecaE.García-SánchezI. M.Martínez-FerreroJ. (2015). Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: An international analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 53(4), 202–214.
28.
Gomez-MejiaL. R. (1994). Executive compensation: A reassessment and a future research agenda. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 12(2), 161–222.
29.
GottesmanA. A.MoreyR. M. (2010). CEO educational background and firm performance. Journal of applied Finance, 20(2), 70–82.
30.
GuptaG.MahakudJ.DebataB. (2018). Impact of CEO’s characteristics on investment decisions of Indian listed firms: Does crisis make any difference? Cogent Economics & Finance, 6(1), 1439258.
31.
HahnJ.HausmanJ. (2003). Weak instruments: Diagnosis and cures in empirical econometrics. American Economic Review, 93(2), 118–125.
32.
HallR. (1977). Organisations, structure and process (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
33.
HambrickD. C. (1991 July). Chief executive as Idi Amin? Fortune, 1–13.
34.
HambrickD. C.MasonP. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
35.
HosmerL. T. (1982). The importance of strategic leadership. Journal of Business Strategy, 3(2), 47–57.
36.
HouseR. J.SpanglerW. D.WoyckeJ. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U.S. presidency: A psychological theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 364. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2393201
37.
HsiaoC.LahiriK.LeeL.PesaranM. H. (1999). Analysis of panels and limited dependent variable models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
HuangS. K. (2013). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 234–244. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1295
39.
JoseM. L.LancasterC.StevensJ. L.JenningsJ. A. (1996). Stability of excellence: Revealed patterns in Tobin’s q-ratios. Journal of Applied Business Research, 12(2), 83–94.
40.
KatzD.KahnR. L. (1978). The social psychology of organisations (Vol. 2, p. 528). New York, NY: Wiley.
41.
KhanW. A.VieitoJ. P. (2013). CEO gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55–66. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.01003
42.
KimberlyJ. R.EvaniskoM. J. (1981). Organisational innovation: The influence of individual, organisational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689–713.
43.
LarckerD. F.RusticusT. O. (2010). On the use of instrumental variables in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(3), 186–205. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.11.004
44.
LewellenW. G.HuntsmanB. (1970). Managerial pay and corporate performance. The American Economic Review, 60(4), 710–720.
45.
LewellenW.LodererC.MartinK.BlumG. (1992). Executive compensation and the performance of the firm. Managerial and Decision Economics, 13(1), 65–74. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090130108
46.
LiebersonS.O’ConnorJ. F. (1972). Leadership and organisational performance: A study of large corporations. American Sociological Review, 37(2), 117. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2094020
47.
MadallaG. S. (2001). Introduction to econometrics. New York, NY: Wiley.
48.
MasulisR. W.WangC.XieF. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom—The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 527–554. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.12.003
49.
MillerD.SardaisC. (2011). Angel agents: Agency theory reconsidered. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 6–13.
50.
MizruchiM. S. (1983). Who controls whom? An examination of the relation between management and boards of directors in large American corporations. The Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 426. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/257831
51.
NielsenS. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 301–316. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00263.x
52.
NorburnD. (1989). The chief executive: A breed apart. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 1–15. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100102
53.
OzkanN. (2011). CEO compensation and firm performance: An empirical investigation of UK panel data. European Financial Management, 17(2), 260–285.
54.
PearceJ. A. (1981). An executive-level perspective on the strategic management process. California Management Review, 24(1), 39–48.
55.
PeniE. (2014). CEO and chairperson characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(1), 185–205.
56.
PhamN.OhK. B.PechR. (2015). Mergers and acquisitions: CEO duality, operating performance and stock returns in Vietnam. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 298–316. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.01.007
57.
RiveraJ.De LeonP. (2005). Chief executive officers and voluntary environmental performance: Costa Rica’s certification for sustainable tourism. Policy Sciences, 38(2–3), 107–127. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-005-6590-x
58.
RoseC. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00570.x
59.
RothK. (1995). Managing international interdependence: CEO characteristics in a resource-based framework. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 200–231. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/256733
60.
SerraF. R.TrêsG.FerreiraM. P. (2016). The ‘CEO’ effect on the performance of Brazilian companies: An empirical study using measurable characteristics. European Management Review, 13(3), 193–205. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12079
61.
SiglerK. J.HaleyJ. P. (1995). CEO pay and company performance. Managerial Finance, 21(2), 31–41.
62.
SinghathepT.PholphirulP. (2015). Female CEOs, firm performance, and firm development: Evidence from Thai manufacturers. Gender, Technology and Development, 19(3), 320–345. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852415596865
63.
SmithN.SmithV.VernerM. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.
64.
StawB. M.SandelandsL. E.DuttonJ. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organisational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/2392337
65.
TichyN. M.DevannaM. A. (1986). The transformational leader. Training & Development Journal, 40(7), 27–32.
66.
TosiH. L.MisangyiV. F.FanelliA.WaldmanD. A.YammarinoF. J. (2004). CEO charisma, compensation, and firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 405–420. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.010
67.
UjunwaA. (2012). Board characteristics and the financial performance of Nigerian quoted firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(5), 656–674.
68.
VintilăG.OnofreiM.GherghinaŞ. C. (2015). The effects of corporate board and CEO characteristics on firm value: Empirical evidence from listed companies on the Bucharest stock exchange. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51(6), 1244–1260. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1073518
69.
WangG.HolmesR. M.OhI. S.ZhuW. (2016). Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta-analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory. Personnel Psychology, 69(4), 775–862.
70.
WheelenT. L.HungerJ. D. (1990). Strategic management. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
71.
ZandiG.LokS. Y. P.AslamA.SinghD. (2015). Is an MBA degree necessary to be a CEO of large corporation: The case of fortune magazine global top 100 corporations? International Business Research, 8(12), 96. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v8n12p96
