
Introduction
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal




I looked at the call for papers, “Poetic responses to Orlando” and paused. Should I contribute? And then I thought, how could I hide in the safety of my so-called normality and straightness when others may have become afraid to dance? So I invited my friends to join me in a poetic response.


I first learned about the mass shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, through the television. Popular news anchors provided “on the scene” reporting. I saw interviews with officials, with those present at the shooting, and with families and friends of victims. The media narrative unfolded against a visual backdrop of the club, almost always a great distance off, blocked by police cars and tape. I thought hard about that distance. I felt the repetition of the information, the personalization of the event through “selfie” photos of individual victims, and the witness accounts emphasizing the ringing of cell phones in the silence following the rampage. Reporters discussed the killer’s radical politics and his use of social media during his killing spree. Beyond these details of an emergent tragedy, though, was a well-rehearsed, overly familiar narrative frame. A recurring spectacle now grows less and less spectacular.

Weeks’s (2011) article on gender-inclusive housing explained, “The roommate you choose can be gay or straight or whatever.” This provoked a spoken-word response to Weeks and a call for seeing drag as a curricular technology. The piece invokes a drag performance the author performed in 2012, used as a teaching performance that queered the historic treatment and criticized the contemporary hypocrisy of the Catholic Church’s stance towards LGBTQ+ people.
This autopoetic narrative centers on identity negotiation in a time of crisis and how we learn and unlearn to respond. After compartmentalizing my sensitivity to gun violence, the Orlando Pulse shooting resurrected in me a strong sense of grief, connection and suffering.
The massacre at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, Florida, impacted the lives of queer people across the world. As a gay White male living hundreds of miles from the horrific events, I was intimately connected with the aftermath through social media, blogs, and news reports. Through autoethnographic exploration of three distinct text-based digital conversations in the days following the massacre, I reflect on the ways that virtual and nonvirtual communication intra-acted to produce and mediate powerful emotional moments. As a performative work told in three(ish) acts, I contextualize these conversations in the fears, desires, and frustrations of my lived experience.
Following in the tradition of poetic inquiry, I offer a series of poems to explore the aftermath of Orlando, Florida shooting on June 12, 2016. The poems call upon the speculative and the imaginative to make its empathic case. The poems, offering distinct perspectives directly connected to the shooting, rely upon news accounts, but do not contain the specific words of any individual.
Gun violence generally and mass shootings in particular have increased dramatically over the past decade. The tragedy inherent in those incidents is magnified by our collective inability to find reasonable avenues for remediating the root causes of such action. Moreover, the ways in which many individuals process such events is to contort the context to suit their existing world view. We can and must do better.

What if we expressed critical qualitative inquiry is/as love?
This reflective essay uses an instance of gestural solidarity forged during
Queer Ugandans operate as
Living in a small southern town, my narrative performance explores the anger, pain, and, at times, privilege of isolation when not having a queer community with whom to publicly mourn following the massacre at Pulse nightclub in Orlando. Complicating this further is my dissonance as to whether or not the Orlando Latinx community is, in fact, my community at all to mourn. When finally finding and attending a vigil a town away, my identity as a queer femme woman was pushed to the side to make way for anti–second-amendment speeches, a political campaign opportunity, and a Muslim man trying to prevent Islamophobia. Weaving the metaphor of the brewing storm with my narrative of the problematics of small town advocacy, what unfolds is a collision of my identities crashing into my prejudicial thoughts and ideas, despite espousing “good liberal,” antiracist, and intersectional politics. Ending with more questions than answers, I narrate the ways in which difference is erased in my small town, and yet, how simultaneously those of us fighting for social justice learn to negotiate challenges together, forging coalitions between people of differences.
This essay considers what we are calling

