
Editorial
Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Autistic people sometimes camouflage their behaviour to appear non-autistic. This meta-analysis rigorously tests the relationship between autistic traits and camouflaging, examining contributing person- and study-level variables. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched PubMED, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations in April 2025. All quantitative designs examining autistic traits and camouflaging on a continuum were included. Fifty papers (
Understanding the autistic trait and camouflaging relationship is critical to identify who is most vulnerable to camouflaging and the way in which autism and camouflaging measurement may influence our understanding of this phenomenon. This directly impacts clinical diagnosis and support, as camouflaging contributes to diagnostic delay and poorer mental health outcomes, creating a cycle of continued camouflaging. Our findings may help to establish the foundation needed to develop targeted interventions.
We completed a systematic search to identify all studies that assessed the relationship between autistic traits and camouflaging. In total, 50 studies met all inclusion criteria. The first author extracted data related to participant characteristics (age, gender, diagnostic status, mental health), autistic trait characteristics, and the camouflaging measurement characteristics.
The 50 contributing studies included a total of 16,895 participants (61% female). These data show that the more autistic traits a person has, the more camouflaging they engage in; this relationship is evident for both males and females, and the strength of this relationship does not vary across the adult lifespan. People from the general population show an increase in the strength of this relationship, compared to those diagnosed, and the relationship changes based on how autistic traits and camouflaging are measured and conceptualised. Mental health did not have a clear impact on the overall relationship.
There is a nuanced relationship between autistic traits and camouflaging, the strength of which is dependent on specific person-related (diagnostic status and depression) and study-related factors (autistic trait measurement type, camouflaging measurement type, and camouflaging subdomain). Autistic traits are most strongly linked to behaviours that help people to assimilate (try to fit in and appear ‘normal’), followed by strategies to compensate for social differences. The act of hiding autistic traits was the least related. Because the relationship between autistic traits and camouflaging was weaker for diagnosed autistic people, further work is needed to test why this occurs. In addition, clinicians must be aware of the potential for camouflaging to disrupt the diagnostic process, and campaigns that aim to reduce stereotypes of autism and promote acceptance of neurodiversity may help to reduce the stigma that drives camouflaging.
Autistic individuals, family members, and professionals often hold differing perspectives on the goals and outcomes of supports for autistic children under 12 years. While traditional approaches prioritise the acquisition of neurotypical behaviours, emerging frameworks emphasise autonomy, self-determination, and well-being. This systematic review synthesised findings from 15 studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs, which were assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Communication, social inclusion, and child well-being emerged as shared priorities. Notable differences were observed; professionals tended to focus on normative developmental goals such as skill acquisition and behavioural compliance, while autistic individuals and family members more often valued flexibility, self-advocacy, and strengths-based approaches. Tensions persist between medicalised and neurodiversity-affirming paradigms. To ensure supports align with what matters to autistic people, future research should prioritise co-design with autistic individuals and families, embrace cultural responsiveness, and develop tools that can flexibly but consistently assess neurodiversity-affirming outcomes. These steps will support more ethical, inclusive, and meaningful goal-setting practices in autism research and support.
Autistic children, their families, and the people who support them often want different things from autism services. Some approaches still focus on teaching autistic children to behave more like non-autistic children, such as making eye contact or using spoken language. However, many autistic people and families are calling for support that values autistic ways of being and prioritises well-being, comfort, and meaningful participation. This systematic review brought together findings from 15 research studies published in the last 10 years. These studies explored what goals matter most to autistic adults, parents, and professionals when supporting autistic children aged 0–12. We reviewed studies that used interviews, surveys, or mixed methods and assessed their quality using standard research checklists. Across studies, several shared priorities emerged. Communication was important to everyone, but in broad terms supporting children to express themselves in the ways that work best for them, including through alternative augmentative communication or non-spoken communication. Stakeholders also consistently valued children’s emotional well-being, mental health, and feeling safe and understood. Many studies highlighted the importance of autonomy, including supporting children to make choices, develop a sense of identity, and have control in their daily lives. Traditional goals such as reducing autistic traits, encouraging eye contact, or teaching neurotypical social skills were often rated as less important. There was strong agreement that supports should help children build comfort, confidence, and inclusion rather than force conformity.
Understanding the causes of autism in sub-Saharan Africa remains limited, contributing to stigma and delayed identification. This multi-site qualitative study examined community explanatory models of autism and related help-seeking practices in Northern Uganda. Data were generated through 25 semi-structured interviews and 4 focus group discussions (
This study looked at how people in Northern Uganda think about autism and what they believe causes it. Researchers spoke with 25 people through one-on-one interviews and 4 group discussions (with 8–10 people per group for a total of 39 people) in 3 districts of the Acholi region of Uganda, covering both urban and rural areas. The data were transcribed and interpreted to understand what seemed most important across all the participants from the interviews and focus groups. Four main themes were identified: (1) Unknown causes, (2) Supernatural causes, (3) Biopsychosocial causes, and (4) Help-seeking responses. Overall, the study found that autism is often poorly understood. Many participants linked it to supernatural explanations, such as witchcraft or punishment from God. Mothers were often blamed and seen as responsible for their child’s condition. People also pointed to wider influences, including modern medical interventions and the long-term effects of war and displacement, as possible causes. These beliefs led to traditional, religious, and modern medical help-seeking responses. Where families followed traditional responses, this could have serious consequences, including harm or even death for the child. This study highlights the importance of working with communities in culturally respectful ways to better understand their perspectives. This can lead to earlier recognition, reduced stigmatisation, better education, and stronger support.
Fall-related injuries are a major public health issue for older adults, contributing to mortality, morbidity, decreased functional ability, loss of independence, and increased healthcare costs. Autistic older adults may be at greater risk for falls due to motor coordination difficulties and antipsychotic medication use. This cohort study used multivariable logistic regression to compare the odds of falling and negative binomial regression to compare the rate of fall-related injuries. Data from Medicare Standard Analytical Files (2013–2021) for autistic and non-autistic older adults aged 65+ were analyzed. The sample included 13,732 autistic and 25,497 matched non-autistic older adults. Our dependent variables were (1) falls, (2) unique fall-related injuries, and (3) fall-related hospitalizations. Overall, 47.4% of autistic older adults had a fall compared to 31.5% of non-autistic older adults. Autistic older adults also had more fall-related injuries and hospitalizations. Accounting for duration of observation, autistic older adults had significantly higher odds of any fall (odds ratio = 1.99; 95% confidence interval = 1.89–2.08), rate of fall-related injuries (incidence rate ratio = 1.93; 95% confidence interval = 1.86–2.01), and rate of fall-related hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio = 1.43; 95% confidence interval = 1.35–1.51) than non-autistic older adults. These findings highlight the need for targeted fall prevention strategies for autistic older adults to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Falls are a big problem for older adults, often causing injuries and making it hard for them to live independently. Autistic older adults might be at higher risk of falling because of movement difficulties. However, no one has studied how often autistic older adults fall. Our study looked at the difference in fall rates, injuries, and hospitalizations between autistic and non-autistic older adults. We used Medicare data from 2013 to 2021 and included people aged 65 and older. We had 13,732 autistic older adults and 25,497 non-autistic older adults in our study. We matched them based on factors like sex, race, and health status to make sure the comparison was fair. We found that almost half (47.4%) of autistic older adults had a fall, compared to only 31.5% of non-autistic older adults. Autistic older adults also had more injuries and hospitalizations from falls. They had about double the likelihood of falling than non-autistic older adults. The rates of injuries and hospitalizations from falls were more about double for autistic older adults compared to non-autistic older adults. These results suggest that we need special programs to help prevent falls and support the health of autistic older adults.
Camouflaging refers to strategies used by autistic individuals to mask traits and adapt to neurotypical norms. Beyond socio-cognitive abilities, recent work suggests that camouflaging is also shaped by psychosocial factors. This study tested an integrative, prediction-oriented model of camouflaging. We hypothesized that higher levels of camouflaging would be associated with socio-cognitive functioning, perceived social misfit, mental health, and lower autism acceptance, and that an integrative model combining these factors would predict individual differences in camouflaging. Participants were 120 autistic adults (
Camouflaging refers to the strategies autistic people use to hide their autistic personality in order to fit into social expectations. While camouflaging can sometimes help in social situations, it often comes with serious costs, including stress, anxiety, depression, and autistic burnout. Many autistic adults report feeling pressure to camouflage because of stigma and how society views autism. Understanding what drives camouflaging is important to reduce its harmful effects and to better support autistic people. This study explored which factors are most strongly linked to camouflaging in autistic adults. Instead of looking only at thinking skills such as intelligence, we included measures of executive functioning (everyday planning), social experiences, autism acceptance, and mental health. A total of 120 autistic adults completed online questionnaires. We used statistical models to test which factors predicted camouflaging. We found that camouflaging was most strongly linked to three factors: difficulties with executive functioning, feeling like a misfit in social situations, and how much participants personally accepted their autistic identity. Intelligence, general social support, and feeling accepted by others as autistic played little role. These findings show that camouflaging is not simply about cognitive skills, but also about self-perception and social pressure. Creating more accepting environments and supporting autistic identity may reduce the need to camouflage and protect mental health.
Despite a wealth of research on autism and interoception, there is not a clear consensus about which dimensions of interoception (if any) are related to autism. This study explored whether self-reported interoceptive accuracy, attention and evaluation are related to autism diagnosis and autistic traits. We analysed questionnaire responses from 519 participants, including 232 autistic participants. We found that people with an autism diagnosis had more negative interpretations of their bodily signals than people without an autism diagnosis, and increasing autistic traits in a general population sample were associated with higher interoceptive attention, lower interoceptive accuracy and higher negative interoceptive evaluation. Our findings suggest that interoceptive evaluation should be a priority for future research.
Autism is thought to be linked to differences in the way people notice, process and understand signals coming from inside of their bodies. This study explored how both autistic traits and autism diagnoses are associated with the processing of bodily signals. We found that among 519 participants, having more autistic traits meant that people paid more attention to body signals, reported lower accuracy at detecting them and had more negative interpretations of those signals. Autism diagnoses were associated with more negative interpretations of bodily signals.
Autism is the fastest growing neurodevelopmental condition in Canada. Caregiver-mediated interventions, such as the Social ABCs, improve early social communication and caregiver empowerment. To enhance accessibility, Social ABCs was adapted into a condensed, group-based model. This study evaluated its implementation and sustainability at a large pediatric hospital, examining child and caregiver outcomes across multiple coach training pathways and French-language delivery. A retrospective chart review included 361 families (children 12–42 months with suspected or confirmed autism) who completed six weekly group sessions and nine individual caregiver coaching sessions between 2020 and 2024. Coaches were trained via expert-led, hybrid, or site-led pathways. Caregiver implementation fidelity improved from 33.6% to 70.0% (
Autism is being identified in more young children in Canada, increasing the need for early supports that families can access in a timely way. The Social ABCs is a caregiver-mediated program that helps caregivers support their child’s early social communication, and it was adapted into a shorter, group-based format to improve accessibility. This study reviewed clinical records from 361 families of children aged 12–42 months with suspected or confirmed autism who participated in the group-based Social ABCs program at a large pediatric hospital between 2020 and 2024. Caregivers attended group sessions and individual coaching, and clinicians were trained using different approaches, including expert-led and hospital-based training. Results showed that caregivers became more consistent and confident in using the strategies they learned, and children showed meaningful improvements in social communication. These improvements were similar for English- and French-speaking families and did not differ based on how clinicians were trained. Using multiple training pathways also allowed the program to serve many more families. Overall, the group-based Social ABCs improved outcomes for caregivers and children while increasing service capacity and access to early autism supports.
Whether and to what extent sociodemographic disparities in school-based autism identification have been occurring in U.S. elementary schools is currently unclear. We investigated for disparities attributable to race, ethnicity, biological sex, family income, and language use by analyzing repeated cross-sectional data collected on very large samples of U.S. fourth graders participating in the National Assessment of Educational Progress from 2003 to 2022 (
Whether students who are Black or Hispanic, females, from low-income families, or who are multilingual learners have been less likely to be identified with autism while attending U.S. elementary schools is currently unclear. Prior work reports conflicting findings and has often been unable to approximate contrasts between similarly situated students including those displaying the same levels of academic achievement and who are attending the same schools. Such contrasts of similarly situated students are necessary to better evaluate for the possibility of differential treatment due to biased or discriminatory practices. We used statistical methods to account for potential alternative explanatory factors (e.g. differences in family income, language use, or academic achievement) to better approximate contrasts between similarly situated students. Doing so provides stronger evidence of disparities in school-based autism identification attributable to race, ethnicity, biological sex, family income, and language use and not instead to alternative explanatory factors. To investigate how these disparities have changed across time, we analyzed very large cross-sectional samples of fourth-grade students from 2003 to 2022. These analyses repeatedly indicated that students who are White, boys, those from higher-income families, or students who are English-speaking are more likely to be identified with autism than students of color, females, those from low-income families, or students who are multilingual learners including among those who are displaying similar levels of academic achievement and who are attending the same schools. Although autism prevalence rates have increased for students from historically marginalized communities, students from these communities are still less likely to be identified with autism while attending U.S. elementary schools. Efforts are needed to ensure equal access to autism services and supports among students attending U.S. elementary schools.
Our understanding of autistic socialization using social network analysis has focused on autistic children and understanding support systems. The purpose of this study is to examine autistic friendship networks in adulthood without focusing on support systems. We broadly recruited autistic and nonautistic college students (
Past research on autistic friendships has either recruited children or has focused on support services. We were interested in autistic adults who might not be enrolled in support services. So, we asked college students to fill out an interview form that included information about their traits and the traits of their friends. Based on answers to questions, participants were considered not autistic (
These findings contradict stereotypes about autistic people preferring to be isolated. This study shows that autistic college students do build close friendships with others. It is important to note that we focused on autistic college students rather than all autistic people. We do not know if these findings apply to other groups of autistic individuals. We also relied on what people told us. It is possible that what people are reporting about their friends is not the same thing their friends would say.
Autistic burnout is typically defined as chronic exhaustion with functional impacts on everyday life. It appears common across work, study, and relationships, yet its emotional and relational dimensions remain underexamined. To document lived experiences of autistic burnout among autistic adults and to identify emotional and relational processes (e.g. shame and masking) that may shape onset, maintenance, and recovery. Eleven autistic adults participated in semi-structured interviews or written responses conducted online between July 2023 and November 2024. Data were analysed using template analysis, combining a priori codes from prior research with inductive coding. Participants described profound exhaustion, sensory overload, and executive dysfunction that disrupted daily life. A prominent emergent theme was shame, which shaped interpretations of functional limits, masking efforts, and help-seeking. Many reported dual-masking, concealing both autistic traits and signs of burnout, which intensified strain, delayed recognition, and undermined recovery. Withdrawal and “gentle re-engagement” through low-demand, people-adjacent activities were described as recovery strategies. Autistic burnout involves physical and cognitive challenges alongside relational and emotional processes that can precipitate and sustain it and complicate recovery. Shame and masking shape how burnout is interpreted and disclosed, underscoring the need for shame-aware, low-demand supports.
Autistic burnout is a period of overwhelming exhaustion and reduced ability to cope with everyday life. Although autistic people have spoken about burnout for many years, there is still little research describing what it actually feels like. In this study, 11 autistic adults shared their experiences of burnout through online interviews or written responses. We analysed their words to look for common patterns and individual differences. Participants described extreme tiredness, difficulty starting and completing everyday tasks, and increased sensitivity to noise, light, or smells. Many withdrew from friends, family, or work to protect their limited energy. A key pattern was shame, feeling embarrassed, inadequate, or like a burden, which shaped how people made sense of their burnout and whether they felt able to ask for help. Several described “dual-masking,” meaning they hid both their autistic traits and the signs of burnout itself. This added pressure often made burnout last longer and delayed access to support. Recovery was often slow. Gentle steps, such as spending quiet time near others without having to talk (“people-adjacent” activities), helped them reconnect without pressure. These findings suggest that supportive environments, where autistic people feel safe to be themselves, may reduce the impact and length of burnout episodes.
Autistic people’s minority status makes them more vulnerable to minority stressors, such as stigmatization and victimization, which are linked to greater stress and lower life satisfaction. The Psychological Mediation Framework (PMF) proposes that cognitive, affective, and social-psychological processes help explain the relationships between these stressors and adverse outcomes. This cross-sectional study tested the PMF in autistic adults by examining how two of its key processes, internalized stigma and loneliness, are associated with stress and life satisfaction. Using self-report survey data from 831 autistic participants enrolled in the Netherlands Autism Register (NAR), aged 18–87 years (
Autistic adults often experience higher levels of stress and lower life satisfaction than non-autistic adults. Recently, research has suggested that these experiences are linked to them being part of a minority group—autistic people. Minorities often experience extra stress from experiences like stigma, sometimes called minority stressors. A theoretical model, the Psychological Mediation Framework (PMF), describes how minority stressors are linked to differences in people’s thoughts, emotions, and feelings. This study examined whether the PMF can also help explain the stress and life satisfaction of autistic adults. We did this by testing whether two important parts of the PMF, internalized autism-related stigma (negative beliefs about being autistic) and loneliness, were linked to their stress and life satisfaction (how content people feel with their lives overall).
We analyzed data from 831 autistic adults who filled out a survey. In our statistical models (mathematical analyses that test how variables are related), we took into account other factors that are more commonly used to examine which factors were statistically associated with stress and life satisfaction in autistic adults, such as the level of characteristics related to autism and education level. By doing this, we increased the chance that any relationships we found could be attributed to minority stressors.
Autistic adults who experienced more internalized autism-related stigma, emotional loneliness (feeling disconnected from close relationships), and social loneliness (lacking a broader social network) reported higher stress levels and lower life satisfaction. We also found that autistic adults with more internalized stigma felt lonelier, and this loneliness was linked to higher stress and lower life satisfaction.
The results suggest that autistic adults may internalize autism-related stigmas, which are linked to greater loneliness, higher stress, and lower life satisfaction. As these findings align with the PMF, we believe future studies should continue using this model. Also, we recommend that researchers should study ways to reduce minority stressors and improve the mental health of autistic adults.
Social support is positively associated with quality of life (QoL) in autistic people, yet almost all evidence is cross-sectional and focused on younger adults. We examined 2-year longitudinal survey data from 209 autistic adults aged ⩾40 years living in the United States, all recruited via the Research Match service of Simons Powering Autism Research for Knowledge. Participants self-reported their general QoL, autism-specific QoL, and social support (subjective support, instrumental support, and social interaction). Cross-lagged panel models tested bidirectional associations. Mean scores increased from Time 1 to Time 2 for the general QoL and autism-specific QoL, while social support was mostly stable. Higher baseline general QoL predicted greater subjective support later, whereas baseline subjective support did not predict later general QoL. A reciprocal relationship emerged between autism-specific QoL and subjective support. Unexpectedly, baseline instrumental support predicted lower subsequent general QoL. Among autistic adults in mid-to-later life, QoL appears to drive subsequent social support more strongly than support drives QoL, with the clearest reciprocity observed for autism-specific QoL and subjective support. Future multiwave studies with more diverse samples are needed to chart long-term trajectories and determine how tailored support can optimize aging outcomes in individuals with autism.
We know little about how autistic people’s perceived social support and quality of life (QoL) influence each other as they age. We surveyed 209 40+-year-old autistic adults living in the United States at two timepoints 2 years apart. They answered questions about their general QoL, QoL specific to their autistic experiences, and three types of social support (subjective support, instrumental support, and social interaction). The first survey was in late 2019/early 2020, and the second was 2 years later – late 2021/early 2022. We found that, on average, middle-aged and older autistic adults reported better QoL after 2 years, while the amount of practical help and the number of social interactions did not change. People who started out with better QoL reported more subjective support later. Reporting better autism-specific QoL at the beginning led to more emotional and practical support later and vice versa – feeling well-supported emotionally initially led to better autism-specific QoL later. Surprisingly, getting more initial practical support was linked to lower overall QoL 2 years later. Our results suggest that helping autistic adults feel comfortable with their identity, manage sensory needs, and navigate services may not only improve their QoL but also strengthen the emotional and practical support they receive from others. Practical help is still important, but it should match the person’s goals and preferences, so that it boosts, rather than harms, life satisfaction. Programs that check in regularly about changing needs, especially around significant life events like retirement or health changes, could make a real difference as autistic adults grow older.
Families face long waits for their child to undergo a diagnostic assessment for possible autism. This study explored the experiences of parents and children/young people (CYP) accessing and professionals providing autism diagnostic assessments in the United Kingdom. This realist evaluation was conducted in three phases: (1) interviews and focus groups with parents, CYP and professionals from six U.K. National Health Service (NHS) childhood autism assessment and diagnosis services; (2) resulting qualitative data were analysed, and programme theories (PTs) explaining how, why and in what contexts childhood autism assessment and diagnosis pathways work well were tested and refined; and (3) recommendations for change were developed by the research team and presented to delegates at six dissemination events including 250 clinicians, managers, parents/carers, commissioners and academics involved in autism assessment and diagnosis. Delegates were invited to select and rank the most important recommendations. There were 121 participants in Phase 1 (18 CYP, 34 parents, 69 professionals). In Phase 2, both families and clinicians confirmed challenges in the assessment and diagnostic process, including increased demand for assessments and insufficient numbers of specialist multidisciplinary team (MDT) practitioners to provide adequately skilled workforces. The need to support families across the whole assessment and diagnostic process was seen as key to providing a quality service but was often not possible. Steps taken to improve the process were identified, and seven PTs covered: improving recognition of children needing referral, referral processes, service organisation, professional skill mix, assessment, feedback/report writing and training/service evaluation. In Phase 3, during consultation, 12 recommendations were selected as most important for change. Several strategies for improving services were identified that may reduce waiting times and increase acceptability and quality of childhood autism assessment and diagnosis services.
Waiting lists for childhood autism assessments are lengthy, meaning families wait a long time for their child to undergo a diagnostic assessment for possible autism. In this study, we explored the experiences of children, young people and parents who have gone through the assessment and diagnosis process in the United Kingdom. We also explored the views of professionals who deliver childhood autism diagnostic assessments. We conducted interviews and focus groups with children, young people, parents and professionals. We recruited participants from six U.K. National Health Service (NHS) assessment and diagnosis services. We wanted to find out how childhood autism assessment and diagnosis processes could be improved. We asked the research participants about their experiences of the autism assessment and diagnosis process to find out what worked well, who it worked well for and under what circumstances. Recommendations for change were developed by the research team and presented to delegates at six dissemination events. Delegates (including 250 clinicians, managers, parents/carers, commissioners and academics involved in autism assessment and diagnosis) were invited to select and rank the most important recommendations. In total, 121 people took part including 18 children and young people, 34 parents and 69 professionals. Participants described their experiences of the assessment and diagnosis process and challenges in the system including increased demand for assessments and there not being enough specialist skilled practitioners available to conduct assessments. Participants also described ways the childhood assessment and diagnosis process could be improved, including better information gathering during referral. The need to support families throughout the whole assessment process (and not just on receiving a diagnosis) was seen as very important. Seven key areas for improvement were identified: accurately recognising when to refer children, the referral process, service organisation, skill mix of autism assessment teams, the diagnostic assessment, feedback and report writing, and training for staff. Twelve recommendations for change were identified by delegates at the dissemination events. The findings can be used to help make recommendations for service development, reduce waiting times and improve the quality of childhood autism assessment services for children, young people and families.
Elevated depressive symptoms among parents of autistic children are well documented and associated with poorer mental health. Mindfulness has been identified as a protective factor against mental health difficulties, but its day-to-day associations with depressive symptoms in this population remain unclear. A total of 210 Chinese parents of autistic children participated in this 15-day diary study, during which they completed daily measures of mindfulness and depressive symptoms. The data were analysed using dynamic structural equation modelling. Results indicated that (1) parents’ daily mindfulness and depressive symptoms exhibited autoregressive stability and showed significant negative reciprocal cross-lagged associations at the within-person level. At the between-person level, (2) higher perceived social support was associated with lower mean depressive symptoms and higher mean mindfulness, and it strengthened the negative cross-lagged effect of daily mindfulness on next-day depressive symptoms; and (3) child externalising problems were positively associated with parents’ overall mean depressive symptoms and negatively associated with both parents’ overall mean daily mindfulness and the autoregressive effects of daily mindfulness and depressive symptoms. Findings underscore the importance of fostering daily mindfulness within a supportive resource context and highlight the need to maintain the day-to-day persistence of mindfulness in families of autistic children with higher externalising problems.
Parents of autistic children tended to feel fewer depressive symptoms on the day after they felt more mindful; likewise, they tended to feel less mindful the day after they felt more depressed. We asked 210 parents in China to complete a short daily questionnaire for 15 days about their daily mindfulness and depressive symptoms. We also looked at two factors that might affect day-to-day mindfulness and depressive symptoms: the level of perceived social support and children’s challenging externalising behaviours directed towards parents. We focused on how parents’ mindfulness and depressive symptoms shift from one day to the next to identify practical ways to improve parents’ mental well-being. We found that more perceived social support was linked to a stronger next-day connection between feeling more mindful and feeling less depressed, whereas more frequent behavioural challenges were linked to more ups and downs from one day to the next in both mindfulness and mood. The findings of this work can guide researchers and practitioners to design simple, everyday actions, such as brief mindfulness moments and better support for families, that help parents feel less low from one day to the next.
Traditional self-report autism measures are often constructed from an “outside view” by non-autistic researchers rather than reflecting authentic autistic experiences. Predictive processing theory offers a framework for understanding autism, but comprehensive tools assessing the subjective manifestations of predictive processing differences and associated challenges have been lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate the Introspective Predictive Processing Inventory (IPPI), a self-report measure assessing predictive processing characteristics and their subjective consequences in everyday life. Through community-led, participatory research, we developed an initial 65-item version in German and English, and employed a five-stage validation approach across three samples (
Most questionnaires used to understand autism are created by non-autistic researchers who imagine what autism might be like, rather than capturing what autistic people actually experience. Scientists have a theory called “predictive processing” that suggests our brains are constantly trying to predict what will happen next in our environment. When these predictions don’t match reality, it can cause stress and difficulties in daily life. However, there was no good way to measure these internal experiences and daily challenges that autistic people face. To address this gap, an autistic researcher worked with autistic community members and non-autistic researchers to create a questionnaire called the Introspective Predictive Processing Inventory (IPPI). They started with 65 questions, developed both German and English versions, and tested it with 790 autistic and non-autistic adults from mostly Germany and the United Kingdom. Using advanced statistical methods, they refined it down to 18 key questions that capture two main areas: difficulties understanding and integrating information from social situations and the environment, and sensitivity to unexpected changes with strong needs for predictability, causing distress when things don’t go as expected. The final 18-question IPPI was highly reliable and could accurately distinguish between autistic and non-autistic people 97% of the time. Importantly, these differences were not related to intelligence levels. These findings provide researchers and clinicians with a new tool to understand the internal experiences of autistic people from their own perspective. This could help develop better support strategies, improve quality of life, and advance autism research that truly reflects autistic experiences rather than outside assumptions about autism.
Autistic girls are often diagnosed late, missed, or misdiagnosed, which can negatively impact quality of life and mental health. Although research shows the social profiles of autistic girls differ from boys in systematic ways that might explain gaps in diagnosis, little is known about how autistic girls’ social language compares to their same-sex non-autistic peers. This study investigated social words—words that make reference to other people—produced by 138 age- and IQ-matched autistic and non-autistic youth (ages 6–15) during one Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition task. Girls used significantly more social words than boys across both diagnostic groups. There was a larger gap in social word production between autistic girls and non-autistic girls than autistic boys and non-autistic boys, with non-autistic girls using the most social words. Non-autistic girls’ social language behavior—including their social word production—sets an especially high bar for autistic girls, who often report trying to blend in with other girls. Growing evidence of the distinct social language profiles of autistic and non-autistic girls versus boys should guide researchers and clinicians to assess autism in ways that are sensitive to sex-associated differences and develop interventions that consider the norms of youth’s target social circles.
Autism is often diagnosed later in girls and women as compared to boys and men. More research is needed to understand how autism presents differently in girls. This study investigates how autistic and non-autistic youth aged 6 to 15 years use social words (e.g. “friend,” “mom,” “help,” “talk”) during an interview about friends, relationships, and marriage as part of an autism diagnostic assessment. Overall, girls used more social words compared to boys and talked more about friends. Specifically, non-autistic girls used the most social words in comparison with other groups. Highly social language produced by non-autistic girls may make it especially hard for autistic girls to blend in with other girls and could lead them to engage in more camouflaging behaviors to hide their autistic characteristics. With such different average social language behavior from girls and boys, researchers should consider adapting autism assessments and interventions to support the unique needs of autistic girls.
Eating difficulties are highly prevalent among autistic children and are linked to negative health consequences. While many mechanisms are thought to underly these behaviors, we know less about how internalizing and externalizing behaviors relate to eating difficulties in autism. The purpose of this study was to examine how internalizing and externalizing behaviors differ between autistic children (3–6 years of age) with parent-reported picky eating (
Many autistic children have trouble with eating (e.g. not eating a wide variety of foods) which can lead to later health issues. While there are many factors that are thought to relate to these eating issues, one factor we know less about are internalizing behaviors, or being worried, anxious, or sad, and externalizing behaviors, or issues with attending to a task or aggressive behaviors. In this study, we looked at differences in externalizing and internalizing behaviors in autistic children, who were 3–6 years of age, with picky eating (80 children with picky eating) and without picky eating (30 children without picky eating). Our results suggested that autistic children with picky eating had more issues with an externalizing and an internalizing behavior than autistic children without picky eating. Our findings are important because both externalizing and internalizing behaviors are likely important factors to consider when supporting an autistic child with eating difficulties and their family. Practitioners who diagnose autism may also be the first to gather both eating and behavioral information and may help to refer the child to a feeding specialist to prevent later issues.
Self-injurious behaviors in autistic youth vary widely in their form, intensity, and potential for physical injury. This study explored predictors of two categories of self-injurious behaviors that were delineated based on their potential for physical injury (self-injurious behavior-High Likelihood and self-injurious behavior-Low Likelihood), with a focus on the role of distress linked to a strong preference for routines (otherwise known as insistence on sameness). The sample included 1892 autistic youth (Mage = 10.82, SDage = 4.14; 22% females) across the United States. Distress associated with insistence on sameness was the strongest predictor of total self-injurious behavior scores, self-injurious behavior-Low Likelihood, and self-injurious behavior-High Likelihood, after controlling for demographic factors and speech level, and remained a unique predictor after accounting for variance explained by other restricted and repetitive behaviors. Sensory hypersensitivity and sensory-seeking were strong unique predictors of all self-injurious behaviors, while hyposensitivity was a weaker predictor of self-injurious behavior total and self-injurious behavior-Low Likelihood, and a non-significant predictor of self-injurious behavior-High Likelihood. Among demographic factors, lower household income was the strongest predictor of all self-injurious behaviors. Higher speech level was a positive predictor of self-injurious behavior-Low Likelihood but a negative predictor of self-injurious behavior-High Likelihood. These findings demonstrate the role of distress associated with insistence on sameness in manifestations of self-injurious behaviors and highlight the importance of exploring predictors at a more granular level to inform targeted interventions and support.
This study explored factors associated with repetitive self-injurious behaviors in autistic youth, focusing on emotional distress linked to a strong preference for routines (often referred to as insistence on sameness), a category of behaviors that includes difficulties with change and a strong preference for routines and/or rituals. We examined two categories of self-injurious behaviors: lower likelihood of physical injury (self-injurious behavior-Low Likelihood) and higher likelihood of physical injury (self-injurious behavior-High Likelihood). The study included 1892 autistic youth of varying ages and cognitive abilities. The main finding was that distress associated with disruptions to routines was the strongest predictor of all types of self-injurious behavior. Youth with greater sensitivity to sensory input or sensory-seeking behaviors were more likely to engage in self-injurious behaviors that could increase risk of physical injury. In contrast, those with reduced sensitivity to sensory input were less likely to engage in self-injurious behaviors. Demographic factors also played a role in the manifestation and severity of self-injurious behaviors. Lower household income was strongly associated with greater self-injurious behavior severity. In addition, higher speech production (e.g. speaking in full sentences) was associated with greater severity of self-injurious behavior-Low Likelihood and self-injurious behavior-High Likelihood. These findings highlight the complexity of self-injurious behaviors in autistic youth and the importance of understanding the different factors that contribute to these behaviors. This study may help to contribute to the development of more responsive, tailored interventions for self-injurious behaviors among autistic youth.
The term
The term
Post-diagnostic support is a critical yet underdeveloped aspect of dementia care, especially for autistic adults who present with distinct cognitive, sensory, and communication needs. Although interventions such as medication management, psychosocial support, environmental modifications, and carer training are known to improve outcomes, their relevance and accessibility for autistic individuals remain poorly understood. As part of the Second International Summit on Intellectual Disability and Dementia, an international working group examined the intersection of autism and dementia with a focus on post-diagnostic care. Drawing on interdisciplinary expertise, the group identified key barriers and opportunities in clinical practice, caregiving, and service delivery. Recommendations are organized across seven areas, including models of post-diagnostic support, caregiving contexts, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, environmental adaptations, and care planning. The discussion emphasizes the complex needs of autistic adults—many of whom have co-occurring intellectual disabilities, psychiatric conditions, or chronic health issues—and the need for individualized approaches that account for sensory sensitivities and communication differences. Existing dementia care frameworks often fail to address these complexities, resulting in significant service gaps. The report calls for urgent investment in research, workforce training, and policy reform to promote equitable, autism-informed post-diagnostic support and improve quality of life for this underserved population.
Autistic adults who develop dementia often experience challenges that are not well addressed by current dementia care systems. After a dementia diagnosis, people may need help with memory, communication, behavior changes, and daily living. For autistic adults, these supports must be adapted to their individual sensory sensitivities, communication styles, and social differences. This article reports on the work of an international group of researchers, clinicians, and advocates who met during the Second International Summit on Intellectual Disability and Dementia. The group examined how post-diagnostic support for autistic adults with dementia could be improved. They reviewed existing evidence, identified key barriers to care, and proposed strategies to strengthen services in areas such as medication use, environmental design, caregiver training, and personalized care planning. The report emphasizes that many autistic adults also have intellectual disabilities, mental health conditions, or long-term physical health issues, which can make care more complex. Current dementia care frameworks often overlook these overlapping needs, resulting in limited or unsuitable supports. The authors call for more research, workforce training, and autism-informed policy changes to ensure that post-diagnostic care is equitable, individualized, and responsive. Enhancing understanding and adapting support can help autistic adults with dementia maintain dignity, comfort, and quality of life.