We conduct a sensitivity analysis to describe conditions under which liquid fuel producers would fund the development of a climate backstop. We estimate (1) the cost to develop competitively priced direct CO2 air capture technology, a possible climate backstop and (2) the effect of this technology on the value of liquid fuel reserves by country and fuel. Under most assumptions, development costs exceed individual benefits. A particularly robust result is that carbon prices generate large benefits for conventional oil producers—making a climate backstop unappealing for them. Unilateral investment does become more likely under: stringent carbon policy, social discount rates, improved technical outcomes, and high price elasticity of demand for liquid fuels. Early stage investment is inexpensive and could provide a hedge against such developments, particularly for fuels on the margin, such as tar sands and gas-to-liquids. Since only a few entities benefit, free riding is not an important disincentive to investment, although uncertainty about who benefits probably is.
AzarC.LindgrenK.ObersteinerM.RiahiK.Van VuurenD.den ElzenK.MoellerstenK.LarsonE. (2010). “The feasibility of low CO2 concentration targets and the role of bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS).” Climatic Change100(1): 195-202.
2.
BakerE.ChonH.KeislerJ. (2009). “Carbon capture and storage: combining economic analysis with expert elicitations to inform climate policy.” Climatic Change96(3): 379-408.
3.
BarkerT.ScrieciuS.S. (2010). “Modeling Low Climate Stabilization with E3MG: Towards a ‘New Economics’ Approach to Simulating Energy-Environment-Economy System Dynamics.” The Energy Journal31(SI-1): 137-164.
4.
BarrassoJ.BingamanJ.EnziM. (2009). “Carbon Dioxide Capture Technology Act of 2009 (S.2744).”
5.
BarrettS. (2009). “The Coming Global Climate-Technology Revolution.” Journal of Economic Perspectives23(2): 53-75.
6.
BarrettS. (2010). “Climate Treaties and Backstop Technologies.” Cesifo working paper series no. 3003.
7.
BoucherO.FolberthG.A. (2010). “New Directions: Atmospheric methane removal as a way to mitigate climate change?” Atmospheric Environment44(27): 3343-3345.
8.
BrandtA.R. (2011). “ROMEO model documentation: The Regional Optimization model for Environmental impacts from Oil substitutes.” Technical report, Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University.
9.
BrandtA.R.FarrellA.E. (2007). “Scraping the bottom of the barrel: Greenhouse gas emission consequences of a transition to low-quality and synthetic petroleum resources.” Climatic Change84(3): 241-263.
10.
BrandtA.R.FarrellA.E. (2008). “Dynamics of the oil transition: modeling capacity, costs, and emissions.” Technical report, Univeristy of California Energy Institute.
11.
BrandtA.R.PlevinR.J.FarrellA.E. (2010). “Dynamics of the oil transition: modeling capacity, depletion, and emissions.” Energy35(7): 2852-2860.
12.
CaldeiraK.KeithD.W. (2010). “The Need for Climate Engineering Research.” Issues in Science and Technology27(1): 57-62.
13.
CaldeiraK.WoodL. (2008). “Global and Arctic climate engineering: numerical model studies.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society a-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences366(1882): 4039-4056.
14.
CaoL.CaldeiraK. (2010). “Atmospheric carbon dioxide removal: long-term consequences and commitment.” Environmental Research Letters5(2): 024011.
15.
ChichilniskyG.EisenbergerP. (2009). “How air capture could help to promote a Copenhagen solution.” Nature459(7250): 1053-1053.
16.
ConsidineT.J.DaltonM. (2008). “Peak Oil in a Carbon Constrained World.” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics1(4): 327-365.
17.
CooperJ.C. (2003). “Price elasticity of demand for crude oil: Estimates for 23 countries.” OPEC Review27(1): 1-8.
18.
FarrellA.PlevinR.J.TurnerB.T.JonesA.D.O’HareM.KammenD.M. (2006). “Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmenal goals.” Science311(5760): 506-508.
19.
FourerR.GayD.M.KernighanB.W. (2003). AMPL: A modeling language for mathematical programing. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Thomson Learning, second edition.
20.
GatelyD. (2002). “The politics of oil-producer cooperation.” The Energy Journal23(1): 136-138.
21.
GerardD.WilsonE.J. (2009). “Environmental bonds and the challenge of long-term carbon sequestration.” Journal of Environmental Management90(2): 1097-1105.
22.
GillP.MurrayW.SaundersM. (2002). “SNOPT: An SQP algorithm forlarge-scale constrained optimization.” Siam Journal on Optimization12(4): 979-1006.
23.
GreeneD.L.HopsonJ.LiJ. (2003). “Running out of and into oil: Analyzing global oil depletion and transition through 2050.” Technical Report ORNL/TM-2003/259, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
24.
GrublerA.NakicenovicN.VictorD.G. (1999). “Modeling technological change: Implications for the global environment.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment24: 545-569.
25.
HaberlH.ErbK.H.KrausmannF.GaubeV.BondeauA.PlutzarC.GingrichS.LuchtW.Fischer-KowalskiM. (2007). “Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences104(31): 12942-12947.
26.
HerzogH. (2003). “Assessing the Feasibility of Capturing CO2 from the Air.” Working paper, MIT Laboratory for Energy and the Environment.
27.
IEA (2009). World Energy Outlook 2009. Paris: International Energy Agency.
28.
ImhoffM.L.BounouaL.RickettsT.LoucksC.HarrissR.LawrenceW.T. (2004). “Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production.” Nature429(6994): 870-873.
29.
IPCC (2005), IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
IPCC (2007), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
JaffeA.B.NewellR.G.StavinsR.N. (2005). “A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy.” Ecological Economics54(2-3): 164-174.
32.
JohanssonD.J.AzarC.LindgrenK.PerssonT.A. (2009). “OPEC Strategies and Oil Rent in a Climate Conscious World.” The Energy Journal30(3): 23-50.
33.
KeithD.Ha-DuongM.StolaroffJ. (2006). “Climate Strategy with CO2 Capture from the Air.” Climatic Change74(1-3): 17-45.
34.
KeithD.W. (2009). “Why Capture CO2 from the Atmosphere?” Science325(5948): 1654-1655.
35.
KharechaP.HansenJ.E. (2008). “Implications of ‘peak oil’ for atmospheric CO2 and climate.” Global Biogeochemical Cycles22(GB3012): 10.
36.
KintischE. (2010). “Asilomar 2 Takes Small Steps Toward Rules for Geoengineering.” Science328(5974): 22-23.
37.
KnappK.E. (1999). “Exploring energy technology substitution for reducing atmospheric carbon emissions.” The Energy Journal20(2): 121-143.
38.
LacknerK.S. (2010). “Washing carbon out of the air.” Scientific American302(6): 66-71.
39.
LacknerK.S.GrimesP.ZiockH.J. (1999). “Carbon dioxide extraction from air: is it an option?” In: 24th Annual Technical Conference on Coal Utilization and Fuel Systems. pp. 885-896.
40.
LacknerK.S.SachsJ.D. (2005). “A Robust Strategy for Sustainable Energy.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity2005(2): 215-269.
41.
LemoineD.M.FussS.SzolgayovaJ.ObersteinerM.KammenD.M. (2011). “The Influence of Negative Emission Technologies and Technology Policies on the Optimal Climate Mitigation Portfolio.” SSRN eLibrary (1558744).
MacCrackenM. (2009). “Beyond Mitigation: Potential Options for Counter-Balancing the Climatic and Environmental Consequences of the Rising Concentrations of Greenhouse Gases.” Policy research working paper 4938, The World Bank.
44.
MorrowD.R.KoppR.E.OppenheimerM. (2009). “Toward ethical norms and institutions for climate engineering research.” Environmental Research Letters4(4): 045106.
45.
NemetG.F. (2009). “Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies.” Energy Policy37(3): 825-835.
46.
NemetG.F.BakerE. (2009). “Demand Subsidies Versus R&D: Comparing the Uncertain Impacts of Policy on a Pre-commercial Low-carbon Energy Technology.” The Energy Journal30(4): 4980.
47.
NemetG.F.HollowayT.MeierP. (2010). “Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking.” Environmental Research Letters5(1): 014007.
48.
NordhausW. (1991). “Economic Approaches to Greenhouse Warming.” In R. Dornbusch and J. M. Poterba, eds., Global warming: economic policy responses. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press. pp. 3368.
49.
NordhausW. (2008). A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
NordhausW. (2011). “Designing a friendly space for technological change to slow global warming.” Energy Economics33(4): 665-673.
51.
NordhausW.D. (2010). “Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107(26): 11721-11726.
52.
NRC (2007). Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase Two). Washington: The National Academies Press.
53.
ParsonE. (2006). “Reflections on Air Capture: the political economy of active intervention in the global environment.” Climatic Change74(1-3): 5-15.
54.
PielkeR.A. (2009). “An Idealized Assessment of the Economics of Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide in Mitigation Policy.” Environmental Science & Policy12(3): 216-225.
55.
PlotkinS.E.SinghM.PattersonP.WardJ.WoodF.KydesN.HolteJ.MooreJ.MillerG.DasS.GreeneD.L. (2009). “Multi-path transportation futures study: Vehicle characterization and scenario analyses.” Technical report ANL/ESD/09-5, Argonne National Laboratory.
56.
RobockA. (2008). “20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists64(2): 14.
57.
RogersE.M. (1958). “Categorizing the adopters of agricultural practices.” Rural Sociology23(4): 345-354.
58.
RubinE.S.YehS.AntesM.BerkenpasM.DavisonJ. (2007). “Use of experience curves to estimate the future cost of power plants with CO2 capture.” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control1(2): 188-197.
59.
SearchingerT.HeimlichR.HoughtonR.A.DongF.X.ElobeidA.FabiosaJ.TokgozS.HayesD.YuT.H. (2008). “Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions fromland-use change.” Science319(5867): 1238-1240.
60.
SharpJ.D.JaccardM.K.KeithD.W. (2009). “Anticipating public attitudes toward underground CO2 storage.” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control3(5): 641-651.
61.
ShepherdJ.CaldeiraK.CoxP.HaighJ.KeithD.LaunderB.MaceG.MacKerronG.PyleJ.RaynerS.RedgwellC.WatsonA. (2009). “Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty.” Report RS Policy document 10/09, U.K. Royal Society.
62.
SmithJ.L. (2005). “Inscrutable OPEC? Behavioral tests of the cartel hypothesis.” The Energy Journal26(1): 51-82.
63.
SocolowR.DesmondM.AinesR.BlackstockJ.BollandO.KaarsbergT.LewisN.MazzottiM.PfefferA.SawyerK.SiirolaJ.SmitB.WilcoxJ. (2011). “Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Chemicals: A Technology Assessment for the APS Panel on Public Affairs.” Report, American Physical Society (APS).
Stolar‘offJ. (2006). “Capturing CO2 from ambient air: a feasibility assessment.” PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.
66.
StolaroffJ.K.KeithD.W.LowryG.V. (2008). “Carbon dioxide capture from atmospheric air using sodium hydroxide spray.” Environmental Science and Technology42(8): 2728-2735.
67.
van den BroekM.HoefnagelsR.RubinE.TurkenburgW.FaaijA. (2009). “Effects of technological learning on future cost and performance of power plants with CO2 capture.” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science35(6): 457-480.
68.
VictorD.G. (2008). “On the regulation of geoengineering.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy24(2): 322-336.
69.
VictorD.G.MorganM.G.AptJ.SteinbrunerJ.RickeK. (2009). “The Geoengineering Option: A Last Resort Against Global Warming?” Foreign Affairs88(2): 64.
70.
VirgoeJ. (2009). “International governance of a possible geoengineering intervention to combat climate change.” Climatic Change95(1): 103-119.
71.
WetterK.J. (2009). “Geoengineering’s Governance Vacuum: Unilateralism and the Future of the Planet.” In: Geoengineering Options to Respond to Climate Change: Input to the Workshop and Suggested Reading. The National Academies.
72.
WilsonE.J.FriedmannS.J.PollakM.F. (2007). “Research for deployment: Incorporating risk, regulation, and liability for carbon capture and sequestration.” Environmental Science and Technology41(17): 5945-5952
