Comparison of Climate Policies in the ENTICE-BR Model

Abstract

This paper uses the ENTICE-BR model to study the effects of various climate stabilization policies. Because the ENTICE-BR model includes benefits from reduced climate damages, it is possible to calculate the net economic impact of each policy. In general, only the least restrictive concentration limit is welfare enhancing. While the policies are welfare enhancing in simulations using optimistic assumptions about the potential of the backstop energy technology, such assumptions mean that the backstop is also used in the no-policy base case, so that climate change itself is less of a problem. Finally, assumptions about the nature of R&D markets are important. Removing the assumption of partial crowding out from energy R&D nearly doubles the gains from policy-induced energy R&D.

Keywords

Climate policy ENTICE-BR model R&D Technological change

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ibenholt

(2002). “Explaining Learning Curves for Wind Power”. Energy Policy 30: 1181-89. Nakicenovic, N.A., A. Grubler, and A. McDonald. (1998). Global Energy Perspectives, IIASA-WEC, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Nordhaus

W.D.

(1994). Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.

Nordhaus

W.D.

Boyer

(2000). Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.

Nordhaus

W.D.

Yang

(1996). “A Regional Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate Change Strategies.” American Economic Review, 886: 741-765.

Popp

(forthcoming). “ENTICE-BR: The Effects of Backstop Technology R&D on Climate Policy Models.” NBER Working Paper #10285, revised version forthcoming in Energy Economics.

Popp

(2005). “Lessons From Patents: Using Patents To Measure Technological Change in Environmental Models.” Ecological Economics, 54(2-3): 209-226.

Popp

(2004a). “ENTICE: Endogenous Technological Change in the DICE Model of Global Warming.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 48(1): 742-768.

Popp

(2004b). “R&D Subsidies and Climate Policy: Is there a ‘Free Lunch’?” NBER Working Paper #10880.

Popp

(2002). “Induced Innovation and Energy Prices.” American Economic Review, 92(1): 160180.

10.

van der Zwaan

B.C.C.

Gerlagh

Klaassen

Schrattenholzer

(2002). ”Endogenous Technological Change in Climate Change Modeling.” Energy Economics, 24: 1-19.