Technology Diffusion in Energy-Economy Models: The Case of Danish Vintage Models

Abstract

Technological progress is an important issue in long-term energy demand projections and in environmental analyses. Different assumptions on technological progress and diffusion of new technologies are among the reasons for diverging results obtained using bottom-up and top-down models for analysing the costs of greenhouse gas mitigation. This paper examines the effect on aggregate energy efficiency of using technological vintage models to describe technology diffusion. The focus is on short- to medium-term issues. Three different models of Danish energy supply and demand are used to illustrate the consequences of the vintage modelling approach. The fluctuating utilisation rates for power capacity in Denmark are found to have a significant impact on average fuel efficiencies. Diffusion of electric appliances is linked to economic activity and saturation levels for each appliance. In the sector of residential heat demand, fuel price increases are found to accelerate diffusion by increasing replacement rates for heating equipment.

Keywords

Technology Energy Policy Environment protection Denmark Global warming Vintage Models

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berndt, Ernst, C. Kolstad and J.K. Lee (1993). “Measuring the energy efficiency and productivity impacts of embodied technical change.” The Energy Journal 14 (1): 33-55.

Burniaux

J.M.

Martin

J.P.

Nicoletti

Oliveira

Martins (1992). “The costs of reducing CO, emissions: evidence from GREEN.” Working Paper 115, OECD Economics and Statistics Department.

Carraro, Carlo and M. Galeotti (1997). “Economic growth, international competitiveness and environmental protection: R&D and innovation strategies with the WARM model.” Energy Economics 19 (1): 2-28.

Carraro, Carlo and J.C. Hourcade (1998). “Climate modelling and policy strategies. The role of technical change and uncertainty.” Energy Economics 20 (5-6): 463-471.

Conrad, Klaus and T.F.N. Schmidt (1998). “National economic impacts of an EU environmental policy: an applied general equilibrium analysis.” in Prost and Braden (eds) Climate change, transport and environmental policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Clarke

John F.

and J.A. Edmonds (1993). “Modelling energy technologies in a competitive market.” Energy Economics 15 (2): 123-129.

Dowlatabadi

Hadi

(1998). “Sensitivity of climate change mitigation estimates to assumptions about technical change.” Energy Economics 20 (5-6): 473-493.

Glueck, Heinz and S.P. Schleicher (1995). “Endogenous technical progress induced by CO, reduction policies: Simulation results for Austria.” Environmental and Resource Economics 5(2): 151-163.

Gottinger

Hans W.

(1987). “Econometric estimation of a technology diffusion model - Pari 2.” International Journal of Technology Management 2(1): 101-118.

10.

Heaps

(1995). LEAP: Long-range Energy Alternatives Planning System: Users Guide for Version 95, www.seib.org

11.

Hogan

William W.

and D.W. Jorgenson (1991). “Productivity trends and the cost of reducing CO, emissions.” The Energy Journal 12 (1): 67-85.

12.

IPCC (1996) Evaluating the costs of mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Second scientific assessment report, Working group III, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

13.

Jacobsen

H. K.

Morthorst

P.E.

Nielsen

Stephensen

(1996). Integration of bottom-up and top-down models for the energy system. A practical case for Denmark (in Danish). Riso-R-910(DA), Ris0 National Laboratory, Roskilde.

14.

Jacobsen

Klinge (1998). “Integrating the bottom-up and top-down approach to energy-economy modelling: The case of Denmark.” Energy Economics 20 (4): 443-461.

15.

Kemp, Rene (1997J. Environmental policy and technical change: A comparison of the technological impact of policy instruments. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. p. 360.

16.

Mabey, Nick and J. James (1997). “Are environmental taxes a free lunch? Issues in modelling the macroeconomic effects of carbon taxes.” Energy Economics 19 (1): 29-56.

17.

Manne

A.S.

and R.G. Richels (1992). Buying Greenhouse Insurance. The Economic Costs of C02 Emission Limits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

18.

Meijers

Huub

(1994). On the diffusion of technologies in a vintage framework: Theoretical considerations and empirical results. (PhD dissertation) Maastricht.

19.

Mailer Andersen, Frits and P. Trier (1995). Environmental satellite models for ADAM. NERI Technical Report no. 148. National Environmental Research Institute, December, pp. 200.

20.

Schneider

Stephen H.

and L.H. Goulder (1997). “Achieving low-cost emissions targets.” Nature 389(September): 13-14.

21.

Toman

Michael

(1998). “Research frontiers in the economics of climate change.” Environmental end Resource Economics 11 (3-4): 603-621.