This article considers the merits of government support for the commercialization of particular energy supply technologies, and sketches a framework for the economic evaluation of different schemes for such support.' Specific current proposals are not analyzed in detail, as the emphasis is on identifying conditions under *Professor of Applied Economics, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
AbernathyW. J.WayneK. “Limits of the Learning Curve.” Harvard Business Review52 (September/October1974), 109-119.
2.
AdelmanMoms A. “The Case for Decontrol.” Challenge22 (July-August1979).
3.
AdelmanMomsJacohyHenry D. “Oil Gaps, Prices, and Economic Growth,” MIT-EL 78-008WP. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Energy Laboratory, 1978
4.
AllenWendy. “Lessons from Early Experience in Reactor Development.” P-5715. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1976
5.
ArrowKenneth J. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” Review of Economic Studies29 (June1962), 155-173.
6.
BaerWalter S.JohnsonLeland L.MerrowEdward W. “Analysis of Federally-Funded Demonstration Projects: Final Report,” R-1926-DOC. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1976
7.
BaerWalter S.JohnsonLeland L.MerrowEdward W. “Government Sponsored Demonstrations of New Technology.” Science196 (27May1977), 950-957.
8.
BallBen C.Jr. “Recent Proposals for the Commercialization of Shale Oil,” MIT-EL 77-003. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Energy Laboratory, 1977
9.
BaronMichael. “The Import Premium: A Procedure for Evaluating Benefits of Reduced U.S. Import Demand.” Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy Draft Memorandum, April1979
10.
BezdekRoger “Analysis of Policy Options for Accelerating Commercialization of Solar Heating and Cooling Systems.” Washington, D.C.: George Washington University, 1971
11.
Booz Allen & HamiltonApplied Research Division. “Introduction to the Analysis of Commercialization Conditions,” ERDA-76-99. 1916.
12.
BuppI. C. “The Economics of Nuclear Power.” Technology Review (February1975).
13.
Charpie Task Force. “The Demonstration Project as a Procedure for Accelerating Application of New Technology” (Charpie Task Force Report)” DOE/RA-00003/1 UC-13. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, 1978
14.
CostelloDennis “Photovoltaic Venture Analysis, Final Report, Vol. 1,” SERI/TR-52-040. Denver: Solar Energy Research Institute, 1918
15.
CoxJames C.WrightArthur W. “The Effects of Crude Oil Price Controls, Entitlements, and Taxes on Refined Product Prices and Energy Independence.” Land Economics54 (February1978), 1-15.
16.
DeAlessiLouis. “An Economic Analysis of Regulation and Government Ownership: Some Evidence from the Electric Power Industry.” Public Choice19 (Fall1914), 1-1.
17.
DoaneJ. W.MacomberH. L. “Learning Curve Analysis and Its Implications for the LSSA Projects,” Engineering Memorandum 393-314. Pasadena, Calif.: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 1976
18.
EadsGeorge. “U.S. Government Support for Civilian Technology: Economic Theory versus Political Practice.” Research Policy3 (1914): 2-2.
19.
EadsGeorgeNelsonRichard R. “Governmental Support of Technology: Advanced Civilian Power Reactors and the Supersonic Transport.” Public Policy19 (Summer1911): 405-405.
20.
HattaT. “A Theory of Piecemeal Policy Recommendations.” Review of Economic Studies44 (February1911): 1-22.
21.
HedermanWilliam F.Jr. “Prospects for the Commercialization of High-Btu Coal Gasification,” R-2294-DOE. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1978
22.
HoilomanJ. HerbertGrenonMichel. Energy Research and Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1975
23.
ICF Incorporated. “Imperfect Competition in the International Energy Market: A Computerized Nash Gournot Model,” Report under Contract EJ-IS-C-01-2835. Washington, D.C.: Office of Policy and Evaluation, Department of Energy, 1979
24.
JacobyHenry D. “Government Support for the Commercialization of New Energy Technologies,” MIT-EL 76.009. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Energy Laboratory, 1976
25.
JoskowPaul L.PindyckRobert S. “Those Subsidized Energy Schemes.” Wall Street Journal, 2July1979.
26.
JoskowPaul L.PindyckRobert S. “Should the Government Subsidize Nonconventional Energy Supplies?” Regulation (September/October1919).
27.
JoskowPaul L.RozanskiGeorge A. “The Effects of Learning by Doing on Nuclear Plant Operating Reliability.” Review of Economics and Statistics61 (May1979), 161-168.
28.
KawamataK. “Price Distortion and the Second-Best Optimum.” Review of Economic Studies44 (February1977): 23-30.
29.
LandsbergHans H.Energy: The Next Twenty Years. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1979
30.
McCallJ. J. “The Simple Economics of Defense Contracting.” American Economic Review60 (December1970), 837-846.
31.
MajdSaman. “A Financial Analysis of Selected Synthetic Fuel Technologies,” MIT-EL 79404WP. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Energy Laboratory, 1979
32.
MansfieldEdwinResearch and Innovation in the Modern Corporation. New York: Norton, 1971
33.
MerrowEdward. “Constraints on the Commercialization of Oil Shale,” R-2293-DOE. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1978
34.
MerrowEdward W.ChapelStephen W.WortbingChristopher. “A Review of Cost Estimation in New Technologies: Implications for Energy Process Plants,” R-2481-DOE. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1979
35.
Midwest Research Institute. “Solar Heating and Cooling of Buildings (SHACOB) Commercialization Report: Part A, Volume 1,” HCP/M70065-01/1. Washington, D.C.: Department of Energy, 1978
36.
MoozWilliam E. “Cost Analysis of Light Water Reactor Power Plants,” R2304-DOE. Sank Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1978
37.
NelsonRichard R.The Moon and the Ghetto. New York: Norton, 1977
38.
New York Times. “Synthetic Fuel Costs Called High.” 11July1979.
39.
New York Times. “Congress Approves Carter Energy Bill.” 10November1979.
40.
PerryRobert “Development and Commercialization of the Light Water Reactor, 1946-1976,” R-2180-NSF. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1977
41.
RobertsKevin W.S.WeitzmanMartin L. “Funding Criteria for Research, Development, and Exploration Projects,” Working Paper 234. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Department of Economics, 1979
42.
RosenSherwin. “Learning by Doing as Joint Production.” Quarterly Journal of Economics86 (August1972), 366-382.
43.
SamuelsonPaul R. “The U.S. Government Synthetic Rubber Program: 1941-1955,” MIT-EL 76-027WP. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Energy Laboratory, 1976
44.
ScbmalenseeRichardThe Control of Natural Monopolies. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, 1979
45.
SchultzeCharles C. “The President's Plan.” Challenge22 (July-August1979), 28-34.
SoloR.A. Synthetic Rubber: A Case Study in Technological Development I under Government Direction. Subcommittee on Patenk, Trademarks, and Copyrights, Senate Committee on the Judiciary (85th Cong., 2d sess.), 1959.
48.
Stanford Research Institute. “A Framework for Evaluating Synthetic Fuels Commercialization Proposals.” Palo Alto, Calif., 1977.
49.
StobaughRobertYerginDanielEnergy Future. New York: Random House, 1979
50.
Synfuels Interagency Task Force. “Recommendations for a Synthetic Fuels Commercialization Program,” submitted to the President's Energy Resources Council. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975
51.
ThurowLester C.The Zero Sum Society. New York: Basic Books, 1980
52.
TolleyGeorge S.WilmanJohn D. “The Foreign Dependence Question.” Journal of Political Economy85 (April1977), 323-347.
53.
U.S. Comptroller General. “First Federal Attempt to Demonstrates Synthetic Fossil Energy Technology-A Failure,” EMD-77-59. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977
54.
US. Comptroller General. “Fossil Energy Research, Development, and Demonstration: Opportunities for Change,” EMD-18.57. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978
55.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. “The Role of Demonstrations in Federal R&D Policy.” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1918
56.
U.S. House Committee on Science and Technology. “Staff Study on Management and Cost Issues Associated with Construction of the CRESAP Coal Liquefaction Facility.” 95th Cong., 2d sess., 1978.
57.
WeidenbaumMurray L.HarnishReno. Government Credit Subsidies for Energy Development. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1976
58.
WeitzmanMartin L. “Optimal Search for the Best Alternative.” Econometrica41 (May1979), 641-654.
