We consider welfare-optimal investment in and operation of electric power systems with constant returns to scale in multiple available generation and storage technologies under perfect foresight. We extend a number of classic results on generation, derive conditions for investment and operations of storage technologies described by seven cost/performance parameters, and develop insights on power systems with multiple storage technologies. Simulation of a deeply decarbonized “Texas-like” power system with two available storage technologies shows both the non-existence of simple “merit-order” rules for storage operation and the value of frequency domain analysis to describe efficient operation. Our analysis points to the critical role of the capital cost of energy storage capacity in influencing efficient storage investment and operation.
BalducciPatrick J.JanM.AlamE.HardyTrevor D.WuDi (2018). “Assigning Value to Energy Storage Systems at Multiple Points in an Electrical Grid.” Energy & Environmental Science11: 1926–1944. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE00569A.
2.
BiggarDarryl R.HesamzadehMohammad Reza (2014). The Economics of Electricity Markets. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118775745.
3.
BoiteuxMarcel (1960). “Peak Load Pricing,” Journal of Business33(2): 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1086/294331.
4.
BoiteuxMarcel (1964). “The Choice of Plant and Equipment for the Production of Electric Energy.” In NelsonJ. (Ed.), Marginal Cost Pricing in Practice. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
5.
OranBrigham E. (1988). The Fast Fourier Transform and its Applications. Prentice-Hall.
6.
BrownTomReichenbergLina (2021). “Decreasing Market Value of Renewables Can Be Avoided by Policy Action.” Energy Economics100: 105345. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.eneco.2021.105354.
7.
BrownPatrick R.BotterudAudun (2021). “The Value of Inter-Regional Coordination and Transmission in Decarbonizing the US Electricity System.” Joule5(1): 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.11.013.
8.
California Public Utilities Commission (n.d.), Energy Storage, available at https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=3462.
9.
CrampesClaudeTrochetJean-Michel (2019). “Economics of Stationary Electricity Storage with Various Charge and Discharge Durations.” Journal of Energy Storage24(August): article 100746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.04.020.
10.
CrewMichael A.KleindorferPaul A. (1986). The Economics of Public Utility Regulation. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07295-8.
11.
CruiseJamesFlatleyLisaGibbensRichardZacharyStan (2019). “Control of Energy Storage with Market Impact: Lagrangian Approach and Horizons.” Operations Research67(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1761.
12.
De LadurantayeDaniel, (2009). “Optimizing profits from hydroelectricity production.” Computers & Operations Research36: 499–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2007.10.012.
13.
DowlingJacqueline A., (2020). “Role of Long-Duration Energy Storage in Variable Renewable Electricity Systems.” Joule4(9): 1907–1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.007.
14.
DrezeJacques H. (1964). “Some Postwar Contributions of French Economists to Theory and Public Policy.” American Economic Review54(2): 1–64.
15.
DraxlCaroline, (2015. “The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit.” Applied Energy151(1): 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.121.
16.
DSIRE database (n.d.), Summary Maps, available at https://programs.dsireusa.org/system/program/maps.
17.
DuggalInderjeetVenkateshBala (2015). “Short-Term Scheduling of Thermal Generators and Battery Storage With Depth of Discharge-Based Cost Model.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems30(4): 2110–2118. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2352333.
18.
GailaniAhmedAl-GreerMaherShortMichaelCrosbieTraceyDawoodNashwan (2020). “Lifetime Degradation Cost Analysis for Li-Ion Batteries in Capacity Markets using Accurate Physics-Based Models.” energies13 (11): 2816. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112816.
19.
GeskeJoachimGreenRichard (2020). “Optimal Storage, Investment and Management under Uncertainty: It is Costly to Avoid Outages!” The Energy Journal41(2): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.41.2jges.
20.
GiuliettiMonicaGrossiLuigiBauteElisa TrujilloWatersonMichael (2018). “Analyzing the Potential Economic Value of Energy Storage.” The Energy Journal39(S1):101–122. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.SI1.mgiu.
21.
GlowackiMichael (2020), European Union Electricity Market Glossary: Energy Storage, available at https://www.emis-sions-euets.com/internal-electricity-market-glossary/1385-energy-storage.
22.
GravelleHugh S.E. (1976). “The Peak Load Problem with Feasible Storage.” Economic Journal86(June): 256–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2230746.
23.
Hawai’i Natural Energy Institute (2019). Dynamic Load Bank: A Practical Solution to Enable Very High Penetration Rooftop PV, Press Release, University of Hawai’i, 12 July, accessed 31 October 2020 at https://www.hnei.hawaii.edu/wp-content/uploads/Molokai-Dynamic-Load-Bank.pdf.
24.
HelmCarstenMierMathias (2018). “Subsidising Renewables but Taxing Storage? Second-Best Policies with Imperfect Carbon Pricing.” Oldenberg Discussion Papers in Economics, No.V-413-18, University of Oldenberg, Department of Economics.
25.
HotellingHarold (1931). “The Economics of Exhaustible Resources.” Journal of Political Economy39(2): 137–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/254195.
26.
JenkinsJesse D.SepulvedaNestor A. (2017). “Enhanced Decision Support for a Changing Electricity Landscape: The GenX Configurable Electricity Resource Capacity Expansion Model.” Working Paper, MIT Energy Initiative, November 27.
27.
JohnstonJosiahHenriquez-AubaRodrigoMauluendaBenjaminFrippMatthias (2019). “Switch 2.0: A modern platform for planning high-renewable power systems.” SoftwareX, 10: 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.100251.
28.
JoskowPaul L. (1976). “Contributions to the Theory of Marginal Cost Pricing.” Bell Journal of Economics7(1): 197–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003196.
29.
JoskowPaul L. (2008). “Capacity Payments in Imperfect Electricity Markets: Need and Design.” Utilities Policy16(3): 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.10.003.
30.
JoskowPaul L. (2019). “Challenges for Wholesale Electricity Markets with Intermittent Generation at Scale: The U.S. Experience.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy39(2): 292–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grz001.
31.
JoskowPaul L.TiroleJ. (2007). “Reliability and Competitive Electricity Markets.” Rand Journal of Economics38(1): 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2007.tb00044.x.
32.
KorpåsMagnusBotterudAudun (2020). “Optimality Conditions and Cost Recovery in Electricity Markets with Variable Renewable Energy and Energy Storage.” Working Paper 2020-05, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March.
33.
MallapragadaDharik S.SepulvedaNestor A.JenkinsJesse D. (2020). “Long-run system value of battery energy storage in future grids with increasing wind and solar generation.” Applied Energy275: 115390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115390.
34.
NguyenD.T. (1976). “The Problem of Peak Loads and Inventories.” Bell Journal of Economics7(1): 242–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003199.
35.
NREL (2019), Annual Technology Baseline, available at https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2019/.
36.
NREL (2018), Electrification Futures Study Load Profiles, available at https://data.nrel.gov/submissions/126.
37.
NSRDB (n.d) National Solar Radiation Database, available at https://nsrdb.nrel.gov/.
38.
PatelPurvin N. (2018). “Developments in Energy Storage Could Spell the End of the Duck Curve.” Power June 1. Available at https://www.powermag.com/developments-in-energy-storage-could-spell-the-end-of-the-duck-curve/?printmode=1.
39.
PetlinGabeMcMahonRachelSmithKari (2018). “Energy Storage Market Survey and Recommendations.” Commissioner Briefing, California Public Utilities Commission, October 24. Available at http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/uploadedFiles/CPUC_Public_Website/Test_Calendar/CPUC%20Energy%20Storage%20Market%20Survey%20and%20Recommenda-tions%2010.22.18(1).pdf.
40.
SchmalenseeRichard (forthcoming). “Competitive Energy Storage and the Duck Curve.” The Energy Journal43(2): forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.43.2.rsch.
41.
SepulvedaNestor, (2021). “The Design Space for Long-Duration Energy Storage in Decarbonized Power System.” Nature Energy6: 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00796-8.
42.
SidhuArjan S.PolllittMichael G.AnayaKarim L. (2018). “A Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Grid-Scale Electrical Energy Storage Projects.” Applied Energy212: 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.085.
43.
SteffenBjarneWeberChristoph (2013). “Efficient Storage Capacity in Power Systems with Thermal and Renewable Generation.” Energy Economics36: 556–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.007.
44.
TurveyRalph (1968). Optimal Pricing and Investment in Electricity Supply: An Essay in Applied Welfare Economics. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.
45.
U.S. Department of Energy (2015). Quadrennial Technology Review 2015: Hybrid Nuclear-Renewable Energy Systems. Available at https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/06/f32/QTR2015-4K-Hybrid-Nuclear-Renewable-Energy-Sys-tems.pdf.
46.
U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2018). Order 841: Electric Storage Participation in Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators. Issued February 15. Available at https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2018/021518/E-1.pdf.
47.
U.S. Government Accountability Office (2018). Energy Storage: Information on Challenges to Deployment for Electricity Grid Operations and Efforts to Address Them. Report GAO-18-402 (May).
48.
VictoriaMartaZhuKunBrownTomAndresenGorm B.GreinerMartin (2019). “The role of storage technologies throughout the decarbonisation of the sector-coupled European energy system.” Energy Conversion and Management201: 111977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111977.
49.
Wind Integration National Dataset Toolkit (n.d.) available at https://www.nrel.gov/grid/wind-toolkit.html.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
