State-induced components constitute the major share of electricity prices for consumers and are generally charged at a fixed rate. We analyze the benefits of charging state-induced price components at time-varying rates instead, especially with regard to the integration of variable renewable energy (VRE) sources and to decarbonization. For this purpose, we apply a detailed power market model that puts particular emphasis on electricity demand and how it is sensitive to prices.For a quantitative case study, the model is parametrized to represent a German energy system with an 85% share of renewables in its power generation. We find that dynamization has a reducing effect on integration costs of VRE, ranging from 0.3 to 3.4 €/MWh. Furthermore, strong distributional effects in favor of flexible consumers can be observed.
AllcottH. (2012). “Real-Time Pricing and Electricity Market Design.” Working Paper, New York University.
2.
BorensteinS. (2005). “The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing.” The Energy Journal26(3): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol26-No3-5.
3.
BorensteinS. (2007). “Wealth Transfers Among Large Customers from Implementing Real-Time Retail Electricity Pricing.” The Energy Journal28(2): 131–149. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No2-6.
4.
BruninxK.MadzharovD.DelarueE.D’haeseleerW. (2012). “Impact of the German nuclear phase-out on Europe’s electricity generation.” Energy Policy60: 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.026.
5.
EckeJ.GokeL. (2017). “WISO Diskurs: Verteilungswirkungen der Energiewende im Stromsektor.” Friedrich Ebert Foundation, Bonn.
6.
EEG (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz) (2017). http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/eeg_2017 [retrieved August 8, 2017].
7.
EhlersN. (2011). “Strommarktdesign angesichts des Ausbaus fluktuierender Stromerzeugung.” PhD thesis, TU Berlin. ENTSO-E - European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (2017). Aggregated Load Data. www.ent-soe.eu/data/data-portal/consumption/Pages/default.aspx [retrieved August 8, 2017].
8.
EPEX SPOT SE (2017). Day-Ahead Prices. www.epexspot.com/en/market-data [retrieved August 8, 2017].
9.
EPEX SPOT SE (2018). UPHEMIA Public Description PCR Market Coupling Algorithm. www.epexspot.com/docu-ment/40113/Euphemia%20Public%20Description [retrieved January 21, 2019].
10.
European Commission (2011). “EU Reference Scenario 2016 - Energy, Transport and GHG Emissions Trends to 2050.” European Commission Working Paper, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/roadmap2050_ia_20120430_en_0.pdf.
11.
Frontier Economics Ltd and BET GmbH (2016). “Kosten und Nutzen einer Dynamisierung von Strompreiskomponenten als Mittel zur Flexibilisierung der Nachfrage.” Report for the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy, Berlin. https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Studien/kosten-nutzen-dynamisierung-strompreiskomponenten.html.
12.
GambardellaC.PahleM. (2018). “Time-varying electricity pricing and consumer heterogeneity: Welfare and distributional effects with variable renewable supply?.” Energy Economics76: 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.020.
13.
GerhardtN.SandauF.ScholzA. (2015). Interaktion EE-Strom, Wärme und Verkehr. Fraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy and Energy System Technology, Report for the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy, Germany. https://www.iee.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/iwes-neu/energiesystemtechnik/de/Dokumente/Veroeffentlichungen/2015/Interak-tion_EEStrom_Waerme_Verkehr_Endbericht.pdf.
14.
GrowitschC.NickS.WetzelH. (2014). “The Costs of Power Interruptions in Germany: A Regional and Sectoral Analysis.” German Economic Review16(3): 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12054.
15.
HirthL.UeckerdtF.EdenhoferO. (2016). “Why Wind is Not Coal: On the Economics of Electricity.” The Energy Journal37(3): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428788.
16.
HirthL. (2015). “The Optimal Share of Variable Renewables: How the Variability of Wind and Solar Power affects their Welfare-optimal Deployment.” The Energy Journal36(1): 149–184. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.L6.
17.
HoganW. (2005). “On an Energy Only Electricity Market Design for Resource Adequacy.” Working Paper, Harvard University.
18.
HollandS.PMansurE.T. (2006). “The Short-Run Effects of Time-Varying Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets.” The Energy Journal27(4): 127–155. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol27-No4-6.
19.
HorowitzS.LaveL. (2014). “Equity in Residential Electricity Pricing.” The Energy Journal35(2): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.2.1.
20.
JahnA.PraetoriusB. (2014). “Spotmarktpreis als Index fur eine dynamische EEG Umlage.” Agora Energiewende, Berlin.
21.
KemptonW.TomićJ. (2005). “Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: From stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy.” Journal of Power Sources144(1): 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.022.
22.
KnautA.PaulusS. (2016). “Hourly Price Elasticity Pattern of Electricity Demand in the German Day-ahead Market.” EWI Working Paper, 16(7).
23.
KraemerC. (2014). “Zukunftiger Kraftwerks- und Speicherpark unter klimapolitischen Rahmenbedingungen.” PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
24.
LundP.LindgrenJ.MikkolaJ.SalpakariJ. (2015). “Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews45: 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.057.
25.
MillsA.WiserR. (2013). “Changes in the Economic Value of Variable Generation at High Penetration Levels: A Pilot Case Study of California.” IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics3(4): 1394–1402. https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC-Vol2.2012.6656763.
26.
MillsA.WiserR. (2015). “Strategies for Mitigating the Reduction in Economic Value of Variable Generation with Increasing Penetration Levels.” Applied Energy147: 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.apenergy.2015.03.014.
27.
PahleM.SchillW.PGambardellaC.TietjenO. (2017). “Renewable Energy Support, Negative Prices, and Real-time Pricing.” The Energy Journal37(3): 147–169. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.SI3.mpah.
28.
PernerJ.ZahringerM. (2017). “Die Dynamisierung der EEG-Umlage - ein erster Baustein zur Sektorkopplung?.” Ener-giewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 17(2): 38–41.
SioshansiR.ShortW. (2009). “Evaluating the Impacts of Real-Time Pricing on the Usage of Wind Generation.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems24(2): 516–524. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.2012184.
31.
UBA - German Environment Agency (2013). “Treibhausgasneutrales Deutschland im Jahr 2050.” German Environment Agency, Berlin.
32.
UeckerdtF.HirthL.LudererG.EdenhoferO. (2013). “System LCOE: What are the Costs of Variable Renewables?.” Energy63: 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.072
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
