This paper evaluates investment incentives for wind power under two market designs: uniform and nodal pricing. An electricity system model is developed, that allows for investments in wind power capacities while carefully accounting for static transmission grid constraints. Wind power capacities are assumed to reach the same expansion target by 2030 under both market designs. The results show that the introduction of nodal prices leads to investments in wind power plants shifting to locations with lower wind yield. The amount of electricity fed into the grid from wind power plants, however, is higher under nodal pricing as curtailment is reduced by two-thirds. Furthermore, grid-optimal wind locations are shown to require higher direct subsidy payments but decrease yearly variable supply costs by 1.5% in 2030. Yet distributional effects present an obstacle to the introduction of a nodal pricing regime, with about 75% of German demand facing an increase in electricity costs of about 5%. To mitigate the distorted investment signals arising from uniform pricing regimes, restricting investments within grid expansion areas proves to be more promising than including latitude-dependent generator-component in the grid tariff design.
50Hertz, Amprion, TenneT, and TransnetBW (2019). “Netzentwicklungsplan Strom (Grid Development Plan Power) 2030, Version 2019.” Technical report Bundesnetzagentur.
2.
ACER (2015). “Scoping towards potential harmonisation of electricity transmission tariff structures.”
3.
AGEB (2021). “Energieverbrauchin Deutschland im Jahr 2020.” https://ag-energiebilanzen.de/, as of 05/09/21.
4.
AmbrosiusM.GrimmV.KleinertT.LiersF.SchmidtM.ZöttlG. (2020). “Endogenous price zones and investment incentives in electricity markets: An application of multilevel optimization with graph partitioning.” Energy Economics92: 104879. ISSN 0140-9883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104879.
5.
BertschJ. (2015). “Is an inefficient transmission market better than none at all? On zonal and nodal pricing in electricity systems.” EWI Working Paper 15/05. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-016-9310-x.
6.
BertschJ.HagspielS.JustL. (2016). “Congestion management in power systems. Long-term modeling framework and large-scale application.” Journal of Regulatory Economics50: 290–327.
7.
BöingF.BruckmeierA.KernT.MurmannA.PellingerC. (2017). “Relieving the German Transmission Grid with Regulated Wind Power Development.” 15th IAEE European Conference 2017.
8.
BorensteinS. (2012). “The Private and Public Economics of Renewable Electricity Generation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26(1): 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.1.67.
9.
BreuerC.MoserA. (2014). “Optimized bidding area delimitations and their impact on electricity markets and congestion management.” 11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14). https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2014.6861218.
Bundesnetzagentur (2020a). “Kraftwerksliste.” https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/ElektrizitaetundGas/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Versorgungssicherheit/Erzeugungskapazitaeten/Kraftwerksliste, as of 05/11/20.
12.
Bundesnetzagentur (2020b). “Markstammdatenregister.” https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/Elektrizitaetund-Gas/Unternehmen_Institutionen/DatenaustauschundMonitoring/Marktstammdatenregister, as of 05/11/20.
13.
DaxheletO.SmeersY. (2007). “The EU regulation on cross-border trade of electricity: A two-stage equilibrium model.” European Journal of Operational Research181: 1396–1412. EEG (2021). “Gesetz für den Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien.” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.040.
14.
EisingM.HobbieH.MöstD. (2020). “Future wind and solar power market values in Germany—Evidence of spatial and technological dependencies.” Energy Economics86: 104638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104638.
15.
ElbergC.HagspielS. (2015). “Spatial dependencies of wind power and interrelations with spot price dynamics.” European Journal of Operational Research241: 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.026.
16.
EnergiebilanzenL. (2020). “Endenergieverbrauch nach Verbrauchergruppen.” https://www.lak-energiebilanzen.de, as of 05/11/20.
17.
ENTSO-E (2018). “Ten year network development plan 2018.”
18.
ENTSO-E (2019). “ENTSO-E Overview of Transmission Tariffs in Europe: Synthesis 2019.” Technical report European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity.
19.
ENTSO-E (2020a). “Ten year network development plan 2020.”
EUROSTAT (2020). “Data on Rural Development.” https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/rural-development/data, accessed: 05/11/20.
22.
FraunholzC.HladikD.KelesD.MöstD.FichtnerW. (2020). “On the Long-Term Efficiency of Market Splitting in Germany.” Working Paper Series in Production and Energy, No. 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111833.
23.
FürschM.HagspielS.JägemannC.NaglS.LindenbergerD.TösterE. (2013). “The role of grid extensions in a cost-effcient transformation of the European electricity system until 2050.” Applied Energy104: 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.050.
24.
GreenR. (2007). “Nodal pricing of electricity: how much does it cost to get it wrong?” Journal of Regulatory Economics 31: 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-9019-3.
25.
GrimmV.MartinA.WeibelzahlM.ZöttlG. (2016a). “On the long run effects of market splitting: Why more price zones might decrease welfare.” Energy Policy94: 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.010.
26.
GrimmV.MartinA.WeibelzahlM.ZöttlG. (2016b). “Transmission and generation investment in electricity markets: The effects of market splitting and network fee regimes.” European Journal of Operational Research254: 493–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.044.
27.
GrimmV.RückelB.SölchC.ZöttlG. (2019). “Regionally Differentiated Network Fees to Affect Incentives for Generation Investment.” Energy177: 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.035.
28.
GrotheO.MüsgensF. (2013). “The influence of spatial effects on wind power revenues under direct marketing rules.” Energy Policy58: 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.004.
29.
GrubbM.J. (1991). “Value of variable sources on power systems.” IEEE Proceedings C—Generation, Transmission and Distribution. 138: 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-c.1991.0018.
30.
HagspielS.JägemannC.LindenbergerD.BrownT.CherevatskiyS.TösterE. (2014). “Cost-optimal power system extension under flow-based market coupling.” Energy66: 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025.
31.
HaucapJ.PagelB. (2014). “Ausbau der Stromnetze im Rahmen der Energiewende: Effizienter Netzausbau und effiziente Struktur der Netznutzungsentgelte.” Düsseldorfer Institut für Wettbewerbsökonomie—DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03373052.
32.
HenckesP.KnautA.ObermüllerF. (2017). “Twenty Years of European Wind Power Production—Balancing Effects in Europe with a Focus on Germany.” Proceedings of the 15th Wind Integration Workshop, Vienna.
33.
HirthL. (2013). “The market value of variable renewables—The effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price Bias-Corrected Reanalysis to Simulate Current and Future Wind Power Output.” Energy Economics38: 218–236.
34.
HöfflerF.WambachA. (2013). “Investment coordination in network industries: the case of electricity grid and electricity generation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics44: 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-013-9227-6.
35.
HoganW. (1999). “Transmission Congestion: The Nodal-Zonal Debate Revisited.”
36.
HörschJ.RonellenfitschH.WitthautD.BrownT. (2018). “Linear Optimal Power Flow Using Cycle Flows.” Electric Power Systems Research158: 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.12.034.
37.
IEA (2019). “World Energy Outlook 2019.” Technical report International Energy Agency.
38.
JägemannC. (2014). “An Illustrative Note on the System Price Effect of Wind and Solar Power—The German Case.” EWI Working Paper 14/10.
39.
JoskowP. (2011). “Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchtable generation technologies.” American Economic Review3: 329–241. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.238.
40.
KarhinenS.HuukiH. (2020). “How are the long distances between renewable energy sources and load centres reflected in locational marginal prices?” Energy 210: 118546. ISSN 0360-5442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118546.
41.
KnautA.TodeC.LindenbergerD.MalischekR.PaulusS.WagnerJ. (2016). “The reference forecast of the German energy transition—An outlook on electricity markets.” Energy Policy92: 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.010.
42.
KotzurL.MarkewitzP.RobiniusM.StoltenD. (2018). “Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optimal energy system design.” Renewable Energy117: 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.017.
43.
LampS.SamanoM. (2020). “(Mis)allocation of Renewable Energy Sources.” TSE Working Paper. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3597481.
44.
LamyJ.V.JaramilloP.AzevedoI.L.WiserR. (2016). “Should we build wind farms close to load or invest in transmission to access better wind resources in remote areas? A case study in the MISO region.” Energy Policy96: 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.011.
45.
LeutholdF.WeigtH.von HirschhausenC. (2008). “Efficient pricing for European electricity networks—The theory of nodal pricing applied to feeding-in wind in Germany.” Utilities Policy16: 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2007.12.003.
46.
LiskiM.VehviläinenI. (2020). “Gone with the Wind? An Empirical Analysis of the Equilibrium Impact of Renewable Energy.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 7(5): 873–900. ISSN 2333-5955. https://doi.org/10.1086/709648.
47.
LückL.MoserA. (2019). “Wind Turbine Integration—Can Current Allocation Policies Curb Transmission Grid Congestions Caused by Renewables Feed-In?” IEEE Sustainable Power and Energy Conference, Beijing. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSPEC48194.2019.8975277.
48.
MatkeC.MedjroubiW.KleinhansD. (2016). “SciGRID—An Open Source Reference Model for the European Transmission Network (v0.2).” http://www.scigrid.de, accessed 05/11/20.
49.
ObermüllerF. (2017). “Build wind capacitites at windy locations? Assessment of system optimal wind locations.” EWI Working Paper 17/09.
50.
PechanA. (2017). “Where do all the windmills go? Influence of the institutional setting on the spatial distribution of renewable energy installation.” Energy Economics65: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.04.034.
51.
PeterJ. (2019). “How Does Climate Change Affect Optimal Allocation of Variable Renewable Energy?” EWI Working Paper 19/03. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113397.
52.
PfenningerS.StaffellI. (2016a). “Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data.” Energy114: 1251–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.060.
53.
PfenningerS.StaffellI. (2016b). “Using Bias-Corrected Reanalysis to Simulate Current and Future Wind Power Output.” Energy114: 1224–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068.
54.
ProlJ.L.SteiningerK.W.ZilbermanD. (2020). “The cannibalization effect of wind and solar in the California wholesale electricity market.” Energy Economics85: 104552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104552.
55.
RichterJ. (2011). “DIMENSION—A Dispatch and Investment Model for European Electricity Markets.” EWI Working Paper 11/03.
56.
SchmidtJ.LeheckaG.GassV.SchmidtE. (2013). “Where the wind blows: Assessing the effect of fixed and premium based feed-in tariffs on the spatial diversification of wind turbines.” Energy Economics40: 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.07.004.
57.
The Boston Consulting Group and Prognos (2018). “Klimapfade für Deutschland.” Technical report.
58.
THEMA (2019). “Review of the Swedish Transmission Grid Tariff Model.” Technical report—THEMA Report 2019-04.
59.
TrioloR.WolakF. (2021). “Quantifying the Benefits of Nodal Market Design in the Texas Electricity Market.” Program on Energy and Sustainable Development: 23.
60.
van den Bergh, K., E. Delarue, and W. D’haeseleer (2014). “DC power flow in unit comittment models.” TME Working Paper—Energy and Environment EN2014-12.
61.
WagnerJ. (2019). “Grid Investment and Support Schemes for Renewable Electricity Generation.” The Energy Journal 40(2).
62.
WeibelzahlM. (2017). “Nodal, zonal, or uniform electricity pricing: how to deal with network congestion.” Frontiers in Energy11: 210–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-017-0460-z.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
