The current European Union vision for a low carbon electricity system requires a large-scale expansion of overhead transmission lines to integrate renewable energy sources and ensure a secure electricity supply for the future. Recently, new installations of overhead transmission lines across Europe have been stymied by local opposition, which causes long delays in project completion and occasional cancellations. This study presents and analyzes data from an unprecedented survey on the social acceptance of transmission lines that was conducted in the EU-27. We find that auxiliary information regarding the positive effects of a grid development project can have a substantial impact in decreasing the opposition of local stakeholders. In particular, emphasizing any long-term carbon reduction potential or economic benefit of a particular project will, on average, decrease the likelihood that a local resident is strongly opposed to the project by 10-11%.
CassNoelWalkerGordonDevine-WrightPatrick (2010). “Good Neighbors, Public Relations and Bribes: The Politics and Perceptions of Community Benefit Provision in Renewable Energy Development in the UK.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning12(3): 255-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2010.509558.
2.
CEER (2012). “5th CEER Benchmarking Report on the Quality of Electricity Supply 2011.” Council of European Energy Regulators (CEER) report.
3.
CohenJed J.ReichlJohannesSchmidthalerMichael (2014). “Re-focussing Research Efforts on the Public Acceptance of Energy Infrastructure: A Critical Review.” Energy76: 4-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.056.
4.
Cotton MatthewDevine-WrightPatrick (2012). “Putting Pylons Into Place: a UK Case Study of Public Perspectives on the Impacts of High Voltage Overhead Transmission Lines.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management56(8): 1-21.
5.
CowellRichardBristowGillMundayMax (2011). “Acceptance, Acceptability and Environmental Justice: The Role of Community Benefits in Wind Energy Development.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management54(4): 539-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.521047.
6.
Devine-WrightPatrick (2008). “Reconsidering Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: A Critical Review.” In M. Grubb, JamasbT.PollittM., Delivering a Low Carbon Electricity System. London: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Devine-WrightPatrick (2009). “Rethinking NIMBYism.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology19: 426-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/casp.1004.
8.
Devine-WrightPatrick (2011). “Enhancing Local Distinctiveness Fosters Public Acceptance of Tidal Energy: A UK Case Study.” Energy Policy39: 83-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.012.
9.
Devine-WrightPatrick (2012). “Explaining ‘NIMBY’ Objections to a Power Line: The Role of Personal, Place Attachment and Project-Related Factors.” Environment and Behavior45(6): 761-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916512440435.
10.
Devine-WrightPatrickBatelSusana (2013). “Explaining Public Preferences for High Voltage Pylon Designs: An Empirical Study of Perceived Fit in a Rural Landscape.” Land Use Policy31: 640-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.011.
11.
ElliottPeterWadleyDavid (2012). “Coming to Terms With Power Lines.” International Planning Studies17(2): 179201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2012.673739.
12.
ENTSO-E (2012). “Ten Year Network Development Plan 2012.” European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) report.
13.
ENTSO-E (2014). “Ten Year Network Development Plan 2014.” European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) report.
14.
European Commission (2006). “Energy Technologies: Knowledge-Perceptions-Measures.” Eurobarometer report EUR22396.
15.
European Commission (2010). “Energy 2020—A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy.” Communication 639.
16.
European Commission (2011). “Energy Roadmap 2050.” Communication 885.
17.
FernandezCarmenLeyEduardoSteelMark (2001a). “Benchmark Priors for Bayesian Model Averaging.” Journal of Econometrics100: 381-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00076-2.
18.
FernandezCarmenLeyEduardoSteelMark (2001b). “Uncertainty in Cross Country Growth Regressions.” Journal of Applied Econometrics16(5): 563-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jae.623.
19.
FurbyLitaSlovicPaulFischhoffBaruchGregoryRobin (1988). “Public Perceptions of Electric Power Transmission Lines.” Journal of Environmental Psychology8(1): 19-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(88)80021-5.
GrossCatherine (2007). “Community Perspectives of Wind Energy in Australia: The Application of a Justice and Community Fairness Framework to Increase Social Acceptance.” Energy Policy35(5): 2727-2736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013.
22.
GutierrezFernandoSchmidthalerMichaelJohannesSimonaVoroncaGutierrezRomanTania E. (2013). “Public Effects Knowledge Base—Deliverable D2.2 of the Project SESAME (Securing the European Electricity Supply Against Malicious and accidental thrEats).” Transelectrica and Politecnico di Torino report.
23.
JobertArthurLaborgnePiaMimlerSolveig (2007). Local Acceptance of Wind Energy: Factors of Success Identified in French and German Case Studies. Energy Policy35(5): 2751-2760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.005.
24.
KaldellisJ.K. (2005). “Social Attitude Towards Wind Energy Applications in Greece.” Energy Policy33(5): 595-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.09.003.
25.
KintischEli (2010). “Out of Site.” Science329: 788-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5993.788.
26.
KobayashiMimakoMoeltnerKlausRollinsKimberly (2012). “Latent Thresholds Analysis of Choice Data under Value Uncertainty.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics94(1): 189-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aar129.
27.
KoopGary (2003). Bayesian Econometrics. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
28.
KoopGaryPoirierDaveTobiasJustin (2007). Bayesian Econometric Methods. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802447.
29.
SimsSallyDentPeter (2005). “High-Voltage Overhead Power Lines and Property Values: A Residential Study in the UK.” Urban Studies42(4): 665-694. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980500060541.
30.
SimsSallyDentPeter (2007). “Property Stigma: Wind Farms Are Just the Latest Fashion.” Journal of Property Investment and Finance25(6): 626-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14635780710829315.
31.
SoiniKatriinaPoutaEijaSalmiovirtaMaijaUusitaloMarjaKivinenTapani (2011). “Local Residents Perceptions of Energy Landscape: The Case of Transmission Lines.” Land Use Policy28(1): 294 - 305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.009.
32.
WarrenCharles R.McFadyenMalcolm (2010). “Does Community Ownership Affect Public Attitudes to Wind Energy? A Case Study from South-West Scotland.” Land Use Policy27(2): 204-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010.
33.
WolsinkMaarten (2007). “Wind Power Implementation: The Nature of Public Attitudes: Equity and Fairness Instead of Backyard Motives.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews11: 1188-1207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005.
34.
WuestenhagenRolfWolsinkMaartenBuererMary-Jean (2007). “Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Innovation: An Introduction to the Concept.” Energy Policy35: 2683-2691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
