The elevator pitch exercise is a staple of most university entrepreneurship programmes. The premise is that someone is in an elevator (lift) with a potential investor and has only the time of the ride to make a pitch and secure a follow-up appointment. In the most typical pitch format, students stand in front of judges and deliver a memorized one- to two-minute proposal. This empirical research examines the strength of a new format for the elevator pitch: the reception format. Data collected from this new format are compared to the traditional one to establish the superiority of the reception format.
BaronR.A.MarkmanG.D. (2003), ‘Beyond social capital: The role of entrepreneurs' social competence in their financial success’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 18, No 1, pp 41–60.
2.
ClarkC. (2008), ‘The impact of entrepreneurs' oral “pitch” presentation skills on business angels initial screening investment decisions’, Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Vol 10, No 3, pp 257–279.
3.
DavidssonP.HonigB. (2003), ‘The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 18, No 3, pp 301–331.
4.
de JanaszS.C.ForretM.L. (2008), ‘Learning the art of networking: A critical skill for enhancing social capital and career success’, Journal of Management Education, Vol 32, No 5, pp 629–650.
5.
DiazC.S. (2009), ‘Teaching the techno-pitch: Taking student innovators beyond the elevator pitch’, Professional Communication Conference, Waikiki, HI, pp 1–7.
6.
FriarJ.H.EddlestonK.A. (2007), ‘Making connections for success: A networking exercise’, Journal of Management Education, Vol 31, No 1, pp 104–127.
7.
HeinonenJ.HyttiU. (2010), ‘Back to basics: The role of teaching in developing the entrepreneurial university’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 11, No 4, pp 283–292.
8.
Hoehn-WeissM.N.BrushC.G.BaronR.A. (2004), ‘Putting your best foot forward? Assessments of entrepreneurial social competence from two perspectives’, Journal of Private Equity, Vol 7, No 4, pp 17–26.
9.
KatzJ.A.GreenR.P. (2007), Entrepreneurial Small Business, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
10.
KlyverK.HunterE.WatneT. (2012), ‘Entrepreneurial ties and innovativeness in the start-up decision’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 13, No 3, pp 153–163.
11.
KolbD.A. (1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
12.
KolbA.Y.KolbD.A. (2005), ‘Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 4, No 2, pp 193–212.
13.
MasonC.M.HarrisonR.T. (2003), ‘Auditioning for money: What do technology investors look for at the initial screening stage?’Journal of Private Equity, Vol 6, No 2, pp 29–42.
RipollésM.BlesaA. (2005), ‘Personal networks as fosterers of entrepreneurial orientation in new ventures’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol 6, No 4, pp 239–248.
16.
SchunkD.H. (2012), Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, Pearson, Boston, MA.
17.
ZullJ.E. (2004), ‘The art of changing the brain’, Education Leadership, Vol 62, No 1, pp 68–72.
