An increasing volume of literature deals with different meanings of the term ‘extension’ due to the many different agricultural extension systems (AESs) in use. Acknowledging the diversity of AESs, the authors recognize that there is usually a bias towards some specific aspect of these interventions that indicates a need to consider a systemic framework for comparative studies. The main purpose of this contribution is therefore to identify such a systemic view, which could be applied to comparative studies of AESs. Three levels of analysis should be scrutinized for considering a systemic view: micro (institutional), meso (national) and macro (international). At the most basic level, all AESs are involved in both intra-actions and interactions of the extension institution. For this reason, the aim of many studies has been to evaluate the institutional functions of extension practices. The functions at this lowest level are used to predict not only how extension professionals think and act, but how they react to their different target groups. The main question at the micro level is therefore to understand how a country can reach its agri-rural development goals through extension institutions and what institutional arrangements and funding trends help to achieve those goals. At the meso level, the most important considerations are national expectations, which lead to governmental support for or restrictions on the extension institution. Socioeconomic conditions and their consequences largely determine what the extension tasks should be. The main question at this level is why a country needs extension services, which define the different missions for them in different countries. Finally, at the macro level of analysis, it is important first to consider international components and their impact on the level of socioeconomic development of particular countries and, then, the extension missions. The main issue at this level is therefore to understand what international forces and considerations affect the present situation of a country and hence create new expectations of the extension system.
AgungaR.OjomoC. (1997), ‘Burnout, job satisfaction and work situation as perceived by district extension officers, Ondo State, Nigeria’, Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, Vol 4, No 1 pp 47–56.
2.
AndersonJ. R.FederG. (2004), ‘Agricultural extension: Good intentions and hard realities’, The World Bank Research Observer, Vol 19, No 1 pp 41–60.
3.
AxinnG. H. (1988), Guide on Alternative Extension Approaches, FAO, Rome.
4.
AzadiH. (2007), ‘Influencing the financial support of agricultural extension on the yield of wheat and barley: An economic assessment’, Jihad (Agricultural Extension and Rural Development Journal), Vol 27, pp 38–53.
5.
AzadiH.GorjievskyM. (2005), ‘Factors influencing on success of immigrant entrepreneurship: A conceptual framework’, Proceedings of the European Congress of Work & Organizational Psychology (EAWOP), 12–15 May, Istanbul.
6.
AzadiH.KaramiE. (1999), ‘Constructs affecting the success of mechanization associations in Fars province’, A Quarterly Journal of Rural Development Studies, Vol 3, No 2 pp 27–64.
7.
AzadiH.KaramiE. (2001), ‘Comparison of mechanization unit of rural cooperatives, production cooperatives and mechanization companies in Fars province, Iran’, Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and National Resources, Vol 5, No 3 pp 33–48.
8.
BayerA. W.BayerW. (1994), Planning with Pastoralists: PRA and More. A Review of Methods Focused on Africa, German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ), Eschborn.
9.
BennettC. (1989), ‘Improving coordination of extension and research’, in BlackburnD. J., ed, Foundations and Changing Practices in Extension, University of Guelph, Guelph, pp l18–128.
10.
BennettC. (1990), Cooperative Extension Roles and Relationships for a New Era: A New Interdependence Model and Evaluation Synthesis to Foster Work with Other Agencies and Organizations, Extension Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
11.
BenorD.HarrisonJ. (1977), Agricultural Extension: The Training and Visit System, World Bank, Washington, DC.
12.
BernetT.OrtizO.EstradaR. T.QuirozR.SwintonS. M. (2001), ‘Tailoring agricultural extension to different production contexts: A user-friendly farm household model to improve decision-making for participatory research’, Agricultural Systems, Vol 69, pp 183–198.
13.
BeynonJ. (1996), Financing of Agricultural Research and Extension for Smallholder Farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa, ODI Natural Resource Perspectives No 15ODI, London.
14.
BlackburnD. J. (1989), Foundations and Changing Practices in Extension, University of Guelph, Guelph.
15.
BlackburnD. J.BrinkmanG. L.DriverH. C. (1982), ‘Understanding behavioural and economic characteristics in working with operators of small farms: A case study in Ontario, Canada’ in JonesG. E.RollsM. J. eds, Progress in Rural Extension and Community DevelopmentVol 1, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 171–188.
16.
BlackburnD. J.VistD. L. (1989), ‘Historical foundations of extension’, in BlackburnD. J., ed, Foundations and Changing Practices in Extension, University of Guelph, Guelph, pp l–10.
17.
BooneE. J. (1989), ‘Philosophical foundations of extension’, in BlackburnD. J., ed, Foundations and Changing Practices in Extension, University of Guelph, Guelph, pp l–9.
18.
BowlerI. R. (1992), The Geography of Agriculture in Developed Market Economies, Wiley, New York.
19.
CaryJ. W. (1993), ‘Changing foundations for government support of agricultural extension in economically developed countries’, Sociologica Ruralis, Vol 33, No 3/4, pp 336–347.
20.
CerneaM. M.CoulterJ. K.RussellJ. F. A. (1985), Research, Extension Farmer: A Two-Way Continuum for Agricultural Development, World Bank, Washington, DC.
21.
ChamalaS.MortissP. D. (1990), Working Together for Land Care: Group Management Skills and Strategies, Australian Academic Press, Brisbane.
22.
ChambersR. (1997), Whose Reality Counts? Putting the Last First, Intermediate Technology PublicationsBath Press, London.
23.
ChambersR.GhildyalB. P. (1985), ‘Agricultural resource-poor farmers: The farmer-first-and-last model’, Agricultural Administration, Vol 20, pp 1–30.
24.
CristóvãoA.PereiraF. (2004), ‘Portugal: Extension reform in the interior north of Portugal’ in RiveraW.AlexG. eds, Demand-Driven Approaches to Agriculture Extension. Case Studies of International Initiatives, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural Development, World Bank PublicationsVol 3, World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 96–103.
25.
DavidsonA. P.AhmadM. (2003), Privatization and the Crisis of Agricultural Extension: The Case of Pakistan, Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Aldershot.
26.
DavidsonA. P.AhmadM.AliT. (2001), Dilemmas of Agricultural Extension in Pakistan: Food for Thought, Network Paper No 116, Agricultural Research and ExtensionODI, London.
27.
DollyD. (1997), ‘Accuracy, congruency, and agreement among researchers, extension workers and pigeon pea farmers in Trinidad and Tobago’, Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, Vol 4, No 1 pp 21–30.
28.
DraforI.FilsonG. C.GoddardE. W. (2000), ‘Cereal.
29.
Producers and the structural adjustment programme in Ghana: A welfare analysis of the first decade of SAP’, Development Southern Africa, Vol 17, No 4 pp 489–499.
30.
EltayebEltahir M. (2005), ‘Agricultural extension in Sudan, policies and reality. The case of Khartoum state’, Master's thesis, Department of Rural Development and Agroecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
31.
EsmanM. J.UphoffN. T. (1988), Local Organizations. Intermediaries in Rural Development, Cornell University Press, New York.
32.
FalveyL.FornoD. (1997), ‘Institutional arrangements in agricultural education, extension and research: Lessons for international development’, Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, Vol 4, No 1 pp 7–14.
33.
FalveyL.MaguireC. (1997), ‘The emerging role for agricultural education in producing future research’, Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, Vol 4, No 1 pp 15–20.
34.
FaureG.KleeneP. (2004), ‘West Africa: Management advice for family farms – the role of producers’ organizations in the delivery of sustainable agricultural extension services' in RiveraW.AlexG. eds, Demand-Driven Approaches to Agriculture Extension. Case Studies of International Initiatives, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural Development, World Bank PublicationsVol 3, World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 104–113.
35.
FederG.WillettA.ZijpW. (1999), Agricultural Extension – Generic Challenges and Some Ingredients for Solutions, World Bank Policy Research Working Papers No 2129World Bank, Washington, DC.
36.
FilsonG. C. (2004), ‘Social implications of intensive agriculture’ in FilsonG. C. ed, Intensive Agriculture and Sustainability: A Farming Systems Analysis, UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 34–50.
37.
FilsonG. C.StoskopfN. C.SimpsonJ.KannenbergL. (2003), ‘Agroforestry extension and the Western China development strategy’ in NielsonW. A. W.DingL. eds, West China Development: Domestic Strategies and Global Implications, Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives, University of Victoria, British Columbia, pp 11–12.
38.
FleischerG.WaibelH.Walter-EcholsG. (2004), ‘Egypt: How much does it cost to introduce participatory extension approaches in public extension services?’ in RiveraW.AlexG. eds, Demand-Driven Approaches to Agriculture Extension. Case Studies of International Initiatives, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural Development, World Bank PublicationsVol 3, World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 40–49.
39.
FrankA. G. (1971), Sociology of Development and Underdevelopment of Sociology, Pluto, London.
40.
FreemanM. M. R. (1992), ‘The nature and utility of traditional ecological knowledge’, Northern Perspectives, Vol 20, No 1, Website: http://www.carc.org/pubs/v20no1/utility.htm.
41.
FultonM. (1995), ‘The future of Canadian agricultural cooperatives: A property rights approach’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 77, pp 1144–1152.
42.
GarforthC. (2004), ‘Demand-led approaches’ in RiveraW.AlexG. eds, Demand-Driven Approaches to Agriculture Extension. Case Studies of International Initiatives, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural Development. World Bank PublicationsVol 3, World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 1–6.
43.
GarforthC.AngellJ.ArcherGreenK. (2003), Improving Farmers' Access to Advice on Land Management: Lessons from Case Studies in Developed Countries, Agricultural Research and Extension Network (AgREN) Paper No 125. Overseas Development Institute, London.
44.
GomeniukM. (2006), ‘The role of extension centers in innovation activities of AIC enterprises. Problems and perspectives of agricultural extension services development’, Conference Proceedings, Sudak, Crimea, Tavria State Agrotechnical Academy/Pennsylvania State University/National Association of Extension Services of Ukraine (DORADA), pp 101–109.
45.
GossK. F. (1979), ‘Consequences of diffusion of innovations’, Rural Sociology, Vol 44, No 4 pp 754–772.
46.
GustafsonD. J. (2004), ‘Kenya: Supporting the demand for change – recent project experience with farmer learning grants’ in RiveraW.AlexG. eds, Demand-Driven Approaches to Agriculture Extension. Case Studies of International Initiatives, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural Development, World Bank Publications, No 3World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 22–30.
47.
HansonJ.JustR. E. (2001), ‘The potential for transition to paid extension: Some guiding economic principles’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 83, No 3 pp 777–784.
48.
IsonR.RussellD. (2000), Agricultural Extension and Rural Development: Breaking Out of Traditions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
49.
JaffeeD. (1998), Levels of Socio-Economic Development Theory, Praeger, Westport, CT.
50.
KaramiE. (1986), ‘Agricultural extension in development theory’, Journal of Extension Systems, Vol 2, No 2 pp 61–69.
KaimowitzD.SnyderM.EngelP. (1989), A Conceptual Framework for Studying the Links between Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer in Developing Countries, ISNAR, The Hague.
KiddA. D.LamersJ. P. A.FicarelliP. P.HoffmannV. (1999), ‘Privatising agricultural extension: Caveat emptor’, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 16, pp 95–102.
55.
KimhiA. (1996), ‘Farmers’ time allocation between farm and off-farm work and the importance of unobserved group effects: Evidence from Israeli cooperatives', Agricultural Economics, Vol 14, pp 135–142.
56.
KislevY.LermanZ.ZusmanP. (1991), ‘Recent experience with cooperative farm credit in Israel’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol 39, No 4 pp 773–790.
57.
LeeuwisC. (2004), Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension, 3 ed, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
58.
LightfootC. (2004), ‘East Africa: Catalytic action for the emergence of farmer empowerment for “demand-driven” extension’ in RiveraW.AlexG. eds, Demand-Driven Approaches to Agriculture Extension. Case Studies of International Initiatives, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural Development, World Bank Publications, No 3World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 16–22.
59.
MaaloufW. D.ContadoT. E.AdhikaryaR. (1991), ‘Extension coverage and resource problems: The need for public–private co-operation’ in RiveraW. M.GustafsonD. J. eds, Agricultural Extension: Worldwide Institutional Evolution and Forces for Change, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
60.
MazoyerM.RoudartL. (1997), Histoire des agricultures du Monde: Du neolithique a la crise contemporanine [History of Worldwide Agriculture. Neolithic Times to the Contemporary Crisis], Seiul, Paris, and Monthly Review Press, New York.
61.
MelkoteS. R. (1998), Communication for Development in the Third World: Theory and Practice, Sage Publications, London.
62.
Merrill-SandsD.KaimowitzD. (1989), The Technology Triangle: Linking Farmers, Technology Transfer Agents, and Agricultural Researchers, ISNAR, The Hague.
63.
MosherA. T. (1976), Thinking about Rural Development, Agricultural Development Council, New York.
64.
Ntifo-SiawE.AgungaR. A. (1994), ‘A comparative study of management effectiveness under the training and visit and general extension systems in Ghana’, Journal of Agricultural Education, Vol 35, No 4 pp 36–41.
65.
OakleyP.MarsdenD. (1985), Approaches to Participation in Rural Development, International Labour Organization, Geneva.
66.
PattonM. Q. (1993), ‘World trends and challenges in extension’, Proceedings Australia Pacific Extension Conference, 12–14 October, Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia, pp 644–654.
67.
PercyR. (1999), ‘Gender analysis and participatory rural appraisal: Assessing the current debate through an Ethiopian case study involving agricultural extension work’, International Journal of Educational Development, Vol 19, pp 395–408.
68.
PrayC.EcheverriaR. (1989), Private-Sector Agricultural Research and Technology Transfer Links in Developing Countries, Linkages Paper No 3ISNAR, The Hague.
69.
PrettyJ.GuijtI.ThompsonJ.ScoonesI. (1995), IIED Participatory Methodology Series. Participatory Learning and Action, a Trainer's Guide, Russell Press, Nottingham.
70.
QuizonJ.FederG.MurgaiR. (2001), ‘A note on the fiscal sustainability of agricultural extension: The case of the farmer field school approach’, Journal of International Agricultural Extension and Education, Vol 8, No 1.
71.
RiveraW. M. (1997), ‘Agricultural extension into the next decade’, European Journal of Agricultural Extension, Vol 4, No 1 pp 29–38.
72.
RiveraW. M. (1998a), ‘Agricultural extension as adult education: Institutional evolution and forces for change’, International Journal of Lifelong Education, Vol 17, No 4 pp 260–264.
73.
RiveraW. M. (1998b), ‘Preparing and upgrading the extension workforce: A comparative analysis of higher agricultural education in Honduras, Malaysia, Nigeria and Peru’ in CrowderL. ed, Training for Agriculture and Rural Development (TARD), FAO Corporate Document Repository, Rome, Website: http://www.fao.org/docrep/w9699e/w9699e10.htm.
74.
RiveraW. M.AlexG. (2004), Demand-Driven Approaches to Agriculture Extension. Case Studies of International Initiatives, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural DevelopmentVol 3, World Bank Publications, Washington, DC.
75.
RiveraW. M.GustafsonD. J. (1991), Agricultural Extension: Worldwide Institutional Evolution and Forces for Change, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
76.
RiveraW. M.SeepersadJ.PletschH. (1989), ‘Comparative agricultural extension systems’ in BlackburnD. J. ed, Foundations and Changing Practices in Extension, University of Guelph, Guelph, pp 139–148.
77.
RiveraW. M.ZijpW. (2002), Contracting for Agricultural Extension: International Case Studies and Emerging Practices, CABI Publishing, Oxford.
78.
RogersE. M.ShoemakerF. F. (1971), Communication of Innovations, Free Press, New York.
79.
RolingN. (1979), ‘The logic of extension’, Indian Journal of Extension Education, Vol XV, No 3&4, pp 1–8.
80.
RolingN. (1982), ‘Alternatives approaches in extension’ in JonesG. E.RollsM. J. eds, Progress in Rural Extension and Community Development, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 87–115.
81.
RolingN. (1988), Extension Science: Information Systems in Agricultural Development, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
82.
RolingN.AscroftJ.ChegeF. W. (1976), ‘The diffusion of innovation and the issue of equity in rural development’, Communication Research, Vol 3, pp 155–170.
RoyP. (1982), ‘Extension with the disadvantaged: A radical view’ in JonesG. E.RollsM. J. eds, Progress in Rural Extension and Community DevelopmentVol 1, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 71–85.
85.
SandsD. M. (1986), ‘Farming systems research: Clarification of terms and concepts’, Experimental Agriculture, Vol 22, pp 87–104.
SeersD. (1982), ‘The meaning of development’ in JonesG. E.RollsM. J. eds, Progress in Rural Extension and Community DevelopmentVol 1, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp 7–24.
88.
SchmitzH. (2004), ‘Brazil: Problems and possibilities in building partnerships among farmers, researchers, and extensionists in Para State’, in RiveraW.AlexG., eds, Demand-Driven Approaches to Agriculture Extension. Case Studies of International Initiatives, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural Development, World Bank Publications No 3, Washington, DC, pp 33–40.
89.
ShahvaliM.AzadiH. (1999a), ‘Investigating philosophical schools of thought to explain human development’, A Quarterly Journal of Rural Development Studies, Vol 2, No 4 pp 21–56.
90.
ShahvaliM.AzadiH. (1999b), ‘Designing of extension research on the basis of paradisciplinary approach’, A Quarterly Journal of Agricultural Development, Vol 6, No 24 pp 139–175.
91.
ShanerW. W.PhilipP. F.SchmehlW. R. (1982), Farming Systems Research and Development: Guidelines for Developing Countries, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
92.
SwansonB. E.FarnerB. J.BahalR. (1990), ‘The current state of agricultural extension worldwide’, in Global Consultation on Agricultural Extension, FAO ReportFAO, Rome, pp 42–76.
93.
SwansonJ.PehuE. (2004), ‘Foreword’, in RiveraW.AlexG., eds, Demand-Driven Approaches to Agriculture Extension. Case Studies of International Initiatives, Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 10, Extension Reform for Rural Development, World Bank Publications, No 3, Washington, DC, p viii.
94.
TchouamoI. R.SteeleR. E. (1997), ‘Educational impacts of the training and visit extension system on small farmers in the west province of Cameroon’, Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, Vol 4, No 1 pp 31–37.
95.
TimmerW. J. D. (1982), The Human Side of Agriculture, Vantage Press, New York.
96.
TodaroM. (1977), Economic Development in the Third World, Longmans, London.
97.
TookerN. E. (1987), ‘Universal principles of extension’, Proceedings of the Australian Agricultural Extension Conference, Brisbane, Australia.
98.
UmaliD. L.SchwartzL. (1994), Public and Private Agricultural Extension: Beyond Traditional Frontiers, World Bank Discussion Paper No 236World Bank, Washington, DC.
99.
Umali-DeiningerD. (1997), ‘Public and private agricultural extension: Partners or rivals?’The World Bank Research Observer, Vol 12, No 2 pp 203–224.
UquillasJ. E.NavasB. G. (1993), Linking Research, Extension and Agricultural Education: An Experience in Ecuador, ODI Agricultural Administration (Research and Extension) Network Paper No 39ODI, London.
102.
van den BanA. W. (1986), ‘Extension policies, policy types, policy formulation and goals’ in JonesG. E. ed, Investing in Rural Extension: Strategies and Goals, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, London.
103.
van den BanA. W.HawkinsH. S. (1988), Agricultural Extension, Longman, London.
104.
van den BergM. (2001), The Agricultural Knowledge Infrastructure: Public or Private?FAO, Rome.
105.
van LinhN. (2001), ‘Agricultural innovation: Multiple grounds for technology policies in the Red River Delta of Vietnam’, doctoral dissertation, Wageningen Universiteit, Wageningen.
106.
WarnerP. D.ChristensonJ. A. (1984), The Cooperative Extension Service: A National Assessment, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
107.
WilsonJ. (1992), Changing Agriculture: An Introduction to Systems Thinking, Kangaroo Press, Kenthurst, Australia.
108.
WilsonM. L. (1952), Community Development Programme in India, Ministry of CD and Co-operationGovernment of India, New Delhi.
