Based on an ethnographic study in an international petroleum company, this paper shows how a research scientist behind the discovery of groundbreaking new techniques distinguishes himself through his creative skills in formulating working instruments, organizational structures and human relations. The author argues that the more this actor is linked up with his institution, his objects of research, his co-workers, and so on, the more inventive he becomes; and the more inventive he becomes, the more he seemingly distinguishes himself by his singularity as an inventor – a genius who exists beyond social, material and cultural constraints. The author calls this actor the ‘distributed-centred subject’.
BouchardV. (2009), Intrapreneuriat, Innovation et Croissance, Editions Dunod, Paris.
5.
BranniganA. (1981), The Social Basis of Scientific Discoveries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
6.
BurgelmanR. (1983), ‘A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm’, ASQ, Vol 28, No 2, pp 154–166.
7.
CallonM. (1985), ‘Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, in LawJ., ed, Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 196–233.
8.
CallonM. (1994), ‘L'innovation et ses mythes’, Annales des Mines, Gérer et Comprendre, Vol 3, pp 5–17.
9.
CallonM.LawJ. (1995), ‘Agency and the hybrid collectif’, South Atlantic Quarterly, Vol 94, No 2, pp 481–507.
10.
LatourB. (2005), Reassembling the Social, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11.
MertonR. (1979), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
12.
MialetH. (1999), ‘Do angels have bodies: Two stories about subjectivity in science, the cases of William X and Mr H’, Social Studies of Science, Vol 29, No 4, pp 551–582.
13.
MialetH. (2006), ‘Do angels have bodies: Two stories about subjectivity in science, the cases of William X and Mr H’, in SelingerE.CreaseR. P., eds, The Philosophy of Expertise, Columbia University Press, New York, pp 246–279.
14.
MialetH. (2008), L'entreprise créatrice: Le rôle des récits, des objets et de l'acteur dans l'invention, Hermès Science Publications, Paris.
15.
MialetH. (2009), ‘Reincarnating the knowing subject: Scientific rationality and the situated body’, Qui Parle, Vol 18, No 1, pp 53–73.
16.
PinchotG. (1985), Intrapreneuring: Why You Don't Have to Leave the Corporation to Become an Entrepreneur, Harper and Row, New York.
17.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. (1999), ‘Towards a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of Corporate Entrepreneurship’, Entrepreurship Theory and Practice, Vol 3, No 3, pp 11–28.
