Beaver Lake is the primary water supply for a rapidly growing region in Northwest Arkansas. The lake is a popular tourist destination and land surrounding it is highly sought after for development. Some voice concern that development could affect lake water quality negatively and threaten future regional growth. The results of the study presented here suggest the spending of 2.4 million annual visitors to Beaver Lake generates 600 jobs, US$12.9 million in income and US$20.9 million in value added to the region. However, this economic activity is not likely to offset the costs to the region of maintaining the water supply and the water quality of the lake.
AllenL. (1996), ‘A primer: Benefits-based management of recreation services’, Parks and Recreation, March, pp 64–76.
4.
ARCE (US Army Corps of Engineers) (1994), Cumulative Impacts of Recreational Boating on the Fox River – Chain O'Lakes Area in Lake and McHenry Counties, Illinois: Final Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental and Social Analysis Branch, US Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago, IL, 194 pp.
AsplundT.R. (1996), Impacts of Motorized Watercraft on Water Quality in Wisconsin Lakes, PUBL-RS-920-96, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Research, Madison, WI, 46 pp.
9.
BWD (Beaver Water District) (2006a), Northwest Arkansas' Clean Water Source, http://www.bwdh2o.org/ (last accessed 10 October 2006).
BrownM.VarT.LeeS. (2002), ‘Messina Hof Wine and Jazz Festival: An economic impact analysis’, Tourism Economics, Vol 8, No 3, pp 273–279.
12.
Carollo Engineers (2006), Beaver Water District Regional Growth Study. Final Report, January 2006, Carollo Engineers, Kansas City, MO.
13.
CarsonR.MitchellR. (1993), ‘The value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water’, Water Resources Research, Vol 29, No 7, pp 2445–2454.
14.
CliffordE.CliffordM. (1967), ‘Self-concepts before and after survival training’, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Vol 6, pp 241–248.
15.
ChangW. (2005), Constructing the Bridge Table. Running Tourism Impact Analysis in IMPLAN Pro Using MI-REC Utilities, Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, http://www.msu.edu/user/changwe4/ipro/bridge2.htm (last accessed 25 March 2005).
16.
ChangW.PropstD.StynesD.JacksonR. (2003), Recreation Visitor Spending Profiles and Economic Benefit to Corps of Engineers Projects, ERDC/EL TR-03-21, US Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
17.
CharneyA.H.VestM. (2003), Modeling Practices and Their Ability to Assess Tax/Expenditure Economic Impacts. The AUBER Conference, New Orleans, LA, October 2003, Economic and Business Research, Eller College of Business and Public Administration, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
18.
ChristensenN.NickersonN. (1995), Jobs and Wages: The Tourism Industry Dilemma. Research Note 22, Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT.
19.
CromptonJ.LeeS.ShusterT. (2001), ‘A guide for undertaking economic impact studies: The Springfest examples’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol 40, pp 79–87.
20.
CummingsR.BrookshireD.SchulzeW. (1986), Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, NJ.
21.
DearmontD.McCarlB.A.TolmanD.A. (1998), ‘Costs of water treatment due to diminished water quality: A case study in Texas’, Water Resources Research, Vol 34, No 4, pp 849–853.
EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1996), Non-point Source Pollution: The Nation's Largest Water Quality Problem, National Water Quality Inventory 1994, EPA841-F-96-004A, http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/facts/point1.htm (last accessed 6 November 2006).
FeenbergD.MillsE. (1980), Measuring the Benefits of Water Pollution Abatement, Academic, San Diego, CA.
26.
GalstonW.A.BaehlerK.J. (1995), Rural Development in the United States: Connecting Theory, Practice, and Possibilities, Island Press, Washington, DC.
27.
GibsonL.J. (1993), ‘The potential for tourism development in non-metropolitan areas’, in BarkleyD.L., ed, Economic Adaptation: Alternatives for Non-metropolitan Areas, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 145–164.
28.
GreenleyD.WalshR.YoungR. (1981), ‘Option value: Empirical evidence from a case study of recreation and water quality’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol 95, No 4, pp 657–673.
29.
HiltonJ.PhillipsG.L. (1982), ‘The effect of boat activity on turbidity in a shallow broadland river’, Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol 19, pp 143–150.
30.
JacksonR.StynesD.PropstD.CarlsonB. (1996), A Summary of the National and State Economic Effects of the 1994 US Army Corps of Engineers Recreation Program, Technical Report R-96-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.
31.
JohnsonS. (1994), Recreational Boating Impact Investigations – Upper Mississippi River System, Pool 4, Red Wing, Minnesota, EMTC 94-S004, Report by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Lake City, MN, for the National Biological Survey, Environmental Management Technical Center, Onalaska, WI, 48 pp.
32.
KellyJ. (1981), Social Benefits of Outdoor Recreation, Department of Leisure Studies, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
33.
LeontiefW. (1986), Input–Output Economics, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, New York.
34.
LoomisJ.CaughlanL. (2006), ‘The importance of adjusting for trip purpose in regional economic analyses of tourist destinations’, Tourism Economics, Vol 12, No 1, pp 33–43.
35.
MarcouillerD.W.GreenG.P. (2000), ‘Outdoor recreation and rural development’, in MachlisG.E.FieldD.R., eds, National Parks and Rural Development: Practice and Policy in the United States, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 33–49.
36.
MastranT.A.DietrichA.M.GallagherD.L.GrizzardT.J. (1994), ‘Distribution of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in the water column and sediments of a drinking water reservoir with respect to boating activity’, Water Research, Vol 28, No 11, pp 2353–2366.
37.
MiernykW.H. (1965), The Elements of Input–Output Analysis, Random House, New York.
PrincipeM. (2005), Filtration Avoidance Annual Report for the Period January 1 through December 31, 2004, Department of Environmental Protection, New York City, March 2005, http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/watershed/pdf/fadannual1-2.pdf (last accessed 4 October 2006).
40.
OlsonD.LindallS. (2000), 2000 IMPLAN Professional 2.0 Software, Analysis, and Data Guide, Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Inc, Stillwater, MN.
41.
PWB (City of Portland Water Bureau) (2003), Source Water Assessment Report, PWS 4100657, Bull Run Water Supply, City of Portland Water Bureau, Portland, OR, http://www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=28215 (last accessed 18 October 2006).
42.
ReuterJ.AllenB.RichardsR.PankowJ.GoldmanC.SchollR.SeyfriedJ. (1998), ‘Concentrations, sources, and fate of the gasoline oxygenate methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in a multiple-use lake’, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol 32, No 23, pp 3666–3672.
StynesD.ChangW. (2005), Economic Impact Methods, Economic Impacts of Tourism and Recreation Website, Department of Park, Recreation, and Tourism Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, http://www.msu.edu/course/prr/840/econimpact/ (last accessed 12 January 2005).
48.
TohmoT. (2005), ‘Economic impacts of cultural events on local economies: An input–output analysis of the Kaustinen Folk Music Festival’, Tourism Economics, Vol 11, No 3, pp 431–451.
49.
WeisbrodG.WeisbrodB. (1997), Measuring Economic Impacts Projects and Programs, Economic Development Research Group, April 1997, http://www.edrgroup.com.
50.
YousefY.A.McLellonW.M.ZebuthH.H. (1980), ‘Changes in phosphorus concentrations due to mixing by motor boats in shallow lakes’, Water Research, Vol 14, pp 841–852.
