Economic Impacts of Cultural Events on Local Economies: An Input—Output Analysis of the Kaustinen Folk Music Festival

Abstract

This paper examines the economic impacts of Finland's Kaustinen Folk Music Festival. The impacts are calculated on output, demand and wages, employment and on national and regional taxes. The results indicate, first, that the effects of the festival on output are about ₠1.7 million. Kaustinen can also be seen as a good investment for the local municipality, as regional tax revenues increased by about ₠65,600 in the year studied, while the annual subsidy was ₠40,365. From the perspective of the Keski-Pohjanmaa region as a whole, the Kaustinen Folk Music Festival has a substantial impact on regional incomes through subsidies (about one-fifth of the costs of the festival is offset by subsidies from the Arts Council of Finland (Ilmonen et al, 1995) and the direct and indirect effects of consumption by festival visitors in different economic sectors. The impact on employment in the region is low (27 employees). The mobilization of voluntary labour, not measured in this study, is, however, considerable. Although the input–output method is laborious and statistically complex, it is very suitable for measuring the impact of tourism or cultural events on local economies. The method provides results that can be used in framing regional policy.

Keywords

economic impacts music festival input–output analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bohlin

Ternhag

(1990), Festivalpublik och Samhälsekonomi- en Studie av Falun Folk Music Festival, Institutet för Turism and Reseforskning, Högskolan Falun/Borlänge.

Flegg

A. T.

Webber

C. D.

Elliott

M. V.

(1995), ‘On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input–output tables’, Regional Studies, Vol 29, No 6, pp 547–561.

Gratton

Taylor

(1986), ‘Economic impact study: Hayfield International Jazz Festival’, Leisure Management, Vol 3, pp 19–21.

Ilmonen

Kaipainen

Tohmo

(1995), Kunta ja Musiikkijuhlat, Kunnallisalan kehittämissäätiö, tutkimusjulkaisut, nro 6.

Miller

R. E.

Blair

P. D.

(1985), Input–Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Miyazawa

(1976), Input–Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Mathematical Economics, No 116, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Myerscough

(1988), The Economic Importance of the Arts in Britain. Policy Studies Institute, London.

Porter

M. E.

(1989), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York.

Richardson

H. W.

(1972a), Input–Output and Regional Economics, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.

10.

Richardson

H. W.

(1972b), Regional Economics, Location Theory, Urban Structure and Regional Change, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.

11.

Smith

Morrison

W. I.

(1974), Simulating the Urban Economy: Input–Output Techniques, Pion, London.

12.

Statistics Finland (1997), Corporate Enterprises and Personal Business in Finland 1995, Official Statistics of Finland, Helsinki.

13.

Statistics Finland (2000), Regional Input–Output 1995: Tables and Complication Methods, Official Statistics of Finland, Helsinki.

14.

Tohmo

(2004), ‘New developments in the use of location quotients to estimate regional input–output coefficients and multipliers’, Regional Studies, Vol 38, No 1, pp 43–54.