A large recreation value may be expected for a long-distance walking track which allows for hiking and camping in a tropical rainforest environment. When such a resource is new, sufficient data are not available for a primary study. A practical way to obtain a value estimate is by employing benefit transfer procedures. Using a travel cost analysis for the Thorsborne Trail as the transfer source, a consumer surplus estimate for the new Cannabullen Track was estimated at about Aus$300 per person per year. This value may contribute to management decisions about further development of facilities along the track and about user fees.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (1989), Australian Standard Geographical Classification Manual, Catalogue number 1216.0, ABS, Canberra.
2.
ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics) (2001), Population by Age and Sex, Catalogue number 3235, ABS, Canberra.
3.
BatemanI. (1993), ‘Valuation of the environment, methods and techniques: Revealed preference methods’, in TurnerR.K., ed, Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management; Principles and Practice, Belhaven Press, London, pp 192–265.
4.
BealD.J. (1995), ‘A travel cost analysis of the value of Carnarvon Gorge National Park for recreational use’, Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Vol 63, No 2, pp 292–303.
5.
BentrupperbäumerJ.M.ReserJ.S. (2002), Measuring and Monitoring Impacts of Visitation and Use in the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area: A Site Based Bioregional Perspective, Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, Rainforest CRC, Cairns.
6.
BergstromJ.C.de CivitaP. (1999), ‘Status of benefit transfer in the United States and Canada: A review’, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 47, No 1, pp 79–87.
7.
BermanM.KimH.J. (1999), ‘Endogenous on-site time in the recreation demand model’, Land Economics, Vol 75, No 4, pp 603–619.
8.
BockstaelN.E.StrandI.E.HanemannW.M. (1987), ‘Time and the recreational demand model’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 69, No 2, pp 293–302.
9.
BoyleK.J.BergstromJ.C. (1992), ‘Benefit transfer studies: Myths, pragmatism, and idealism’, Water Resources Research, Vol 28, No 3, pp 657–663.
10.
BrookshireD.S.NeillH.R. (1992), ‘Benefit transfers: Conceptual and empirical issues’, Water Resources Research, Vol 28, No 3, pp 651–655.
11.
BrouwerR. (2000), ‘Environmental value transfer: State of the art and future prospects’, Ecological Economics, Vol 32, No 1, pp 137–152.
12.
BrouwerR.SpaninksF. (1999), ‘The validity of environmental benefits transfer: Further empirical testing’, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol 14, No 1, pp 95–117.
13.
CarrL.MendelsohnR. (2003), ‘Valuing coral reefs: A travel cost analysis of the Great Barrier Reef’, Ambio, Vol 32, No 5, pp 353–357.
14.
ClawsonM.KnetschJ.L. (1966), Economics of Outdoor Recreation, The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
15.
CookA.HarrisonS. (2002), ‘Economic evaluation of proposed long-distance walking tracks in the wet tropics of Queensland’, Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol 32, No 2, (Special Issue), pp 113–129.
DesvousgesW.H.NaughtonM.C.ParsonsG.R. (1992), ‘Benefit transfer: Conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies’, Water Resources Research, Vol 28, No 3, pp 675–683.
18.
EwingG.O. (1980), ‘Progress and problems in the development of recreational trip generation and trip distribution models’, Leisure Sciences, Vol 3, No 1, pp 1–24.
19.
FixP.LoomisJ. (1997), ‘The economic benefits of mountain biking at one of its meccas: An application of the travel cost method to mountain biking in Moab, Utah’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 29, No 3, pp 342–353.
20.
GarrodG.WillisK.G. (1999), Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case Studies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
21.
HaabT.C.McConnellK.E. (2002), Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
22.
HaspelA.E.JohnsonF.R. (1982), ‘Multiple destination trip bias in recreation benefit estimation’, Land Economics, Vol 58, No 3, pp 364–372.
23.
HunterS. (2002), ‘Ranger responsible for Thorsborne Trail, QPWS, Townsville’, personal communication.
24.
KirchhoffS.ColbyB.G.LaFranceJ.T. (1997), ‘Evaluating the performance of benefit transfer: An empirical inquiry’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol 33, No 1, pp 75–93.
25.
KnapmanB.StoecklN. (1995), ‘Recreation user fees: An Australian empirical investigation’, Tourism Economics, Vol 1, No 1, pp 5–15.
26.
LoomisJ.B. (1992), ‘The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: Benefit function transfer’, Water Resources Research, Vol 28, No 3, pp 701–705.
27.
LoomisJ.B.WalshR.G. (1997), Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs, Venture Publishing, State College, PA.
28.
LoomisJ.RoachB.WardF.ReadyR. (1995), ‘Testing transferability of recreation demand models across regions: A study of Corps of Engineer reservoirs’, Water Resources Research, Vol 31, No 3, pp 721–730.
29.
McDonaldG.LaneM., eds (2000), Securing the Wet Tropics?, The Federation Press, Sydney.
30.
McKeanJ.R.JohnsonD.M.WalshR.G. (1995), ‘Valuing time in travel cost demand analysis: An empirical investigation’, Land Economics, Vol 71, No 1, pp 96–105.
31.
MercerD. (1977), ‘The factors affecting recreational demand’, in MercerD., ed, Leisure and Recreation in Australia, Hedges and Bell, Maryborough, pp 59–68.
32.
MorrisonM.BennettJ.BlameyR.LouviereJ. (1998), Choice Modelling and Tests of Benefit Transfer, Choice Modelling Research Report 8, University of New South Wales, Canberra.
33.
ParsonsG.R.KealyM.J. (1994), ‘Benefits transfer in a random utility model of recreation’, Water Resources Research, Vol 30, No 8, pp 2477–2484.
34.
PearceD.WhittingtonD.GeorgiouS.JamesD. (1994), Project and Policy Appraisal: Integrating Economics and Environment, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
35.
PiperS.MartinW.E. (2001), ‘Evaluating the accuracy of the benefit transfer method: A rural water supply application in the USA’, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol 63, No 3, pp 223–235.
36.
PrayagaP.RolfeJ.SindenJ. (2006), ‘A travel cost analysis of the value of special events: Gemfest in Central Queensland’, Tourism Economics, Vol 12, No 3, pp 403–420.
37.
RosenbergerR.S.LoomisJ.B. (2000a), Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Values, US Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO.
38.
RosenbergerR.S.LoomisJ.B. (2000b), ‘Using meta-analysis for benefit transfer: In-sample convergent validity tests of an outdoor recreation database’, Water Resources Research, Vol 36, No 4, pp 1097–1107.
39.
SmithV.K. (1992), ‘On separating defensible benefit transfers from “smoke and mirrors”’, Water Resources Research, Vol 28, No 3, pp 541–564.
40.
SorensenL. (2003), ‘Misty Mountains Trails marketing action plan’, personal communication.
41.
StoecklN. (1995), ‘A travel cost analysis of Hinchinbrook Island National Park’, in FaulknerB.FagenceM.DavidsonM.Craig-SmithS., eds, Tourism Research and Education in Australia, (Proceedings of the Australian National Tourism Research and Education Conference, Gold Coast, 1994), Bureau of Tourism Research, Canberra, pp 187–201.
42.
VollbonT.DavernR. (1994), Draft: Russell and Mulgrave Rivers Long-Distance Walking Track Feasibility Study, The Parkscape Group, Brisbane.
43.
WhittenS.BennettJ.W. (2002), ‘A travel cost study of duck hunting in the upper south east of South Australia’, Australian Geographer, Vol 33, No 2, pp 207–221.
