Special events play an important part in tourism and recreation choices in Australia, and many receive funding from various levels of government. However, the economic case for funding special events often focuses on estimates of expenditure, employment and indirect impacts rather than estimates of economic benefit or consumer surplus. The study discusses the application of the travel cost method for estimating consumer surplus associated with a special event. The event studied is the annual four-day ‘Gemfest’ in the sapphire fields of Central Queensland. Surveys were conducted in 1998 and 2002, and the derivations of the appropriate models, welfare calculations and comparisons over time are outlined.
ABS (1996), 1996 Census of Population and Housing, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.
2.
ABS (2001), 2001 Census of Population and Housing, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.
3.
AdamowiczW.L.FletcherJ.J.Graham-TomasiT. (1989), ‘Functional form and the statistical properties of welfare measures’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 71, No 2, pp 414–421.
4.
ATO (1999), Tax Pack 1999, Australian Taxation Office, Canberra.
5.
ATO (2003), Tax Pack 2003, Australian Taxation Office, Canberra.
6.
BatemanI.J. (1993), ‘Valuation of the environment methods and techniques: Revealed preference methods’, in TurnerR. Kerry, ed, Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management - Principles and Practice, Belhaven Press, London, pp 192–233.
7.
BealD.J. (1995), ‘A travel cost analysis of the value of Carnarvon Gorge National Park for recreational use’, Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Vol 63, No 2, pp 292–303.
8.
BennettJ. (1996), ‘Estimating the recreational use values of national parks’, Tourism Economics, Vol 2, No 4, pp 303–320.
9.
BowesM.D.LoomisJ.B. (1980), ‘A note on the use of travel cost models with unequal zonal populations’, Land Economics, Vol 56, No 4, pp 465–470.
10.
BowkerJ.M.LeeworthyV.R. (1998), ‘Accounting for ethnicity in recreation demand: A flexible count data approach’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 30, No 1, p 64.
11.
CaseyJ.F.VukinaT.DanielsonL.E. (1995), ‘The economic value of hiking: Further on opportunity cost of time in recreational demand models’, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol 27, No 2, pp 658–668.
12.
CommonM.S. (1973), ‘A note on the use of the Clawson method for the evaluation of recreation site benefits’, Regional Studies, Vol 7, pp 401–406.
13.
CommonM.S.McKenneyD.W. (1994), ‘Investigating the reliability of a hedonic travel cost model: A Monte Carlo approach’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol 24, pp 358–363.
CoupalR.H.BastianC.MayJ.TaylorD.T. (2001), ‘The economic benefits of snowmobiling to Wyoming residents: A travel cost approach with market segmentation’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 33, No 4, pp 492–510.
16.
CrookerJ.KlingC.L. (2000), ‘Nonparametric bounds on welfare measures: A new tool for nonmarket valuation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol 39, pp 145–161.
17.
FeatherP.ShawW.D. (1998), ‘Estimating the cost of leisure time for recreation demand models’, Summer AAEA Meetings, Salt Lake City, UT.
18.
FixP.LoomisJ. (1997), ‘The economic benefits of mountain biking at one of its Meccas: An application of the travel cost method to mountain biking in Moab, Utah’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 29, No 3, p 342.
19.
FletcherJ.J.AdamowiczW.L.Graham-TomasiT. (1990), ‘The travel cost model of recreation demand: Theoretical and empirical issues’, Leisure Sciences, Vol 12, pp 119–147.
20.
FreyB.S. (1994), ‘The economics of music festivals’, Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol 18, pp 29–39.
21.
GreeneW.E. (1993), Econometric Analysis, Macmillan, New York.
22.
GriffithsW.E.HillR.C.JudgeG.G. (1993), Learning and Practicing Econometrics, Wiley, New York.
23.
HanleyN.SpashC.L. (1993), Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
24.
HellersteinD. (1993), ‘Intertemporal data and travel cost analysis’, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol 3, No 2, pp 193–207.
25.
HerathG. (1999), ‘Estimation of community values of lakes: A study of Lake Mokoan in Victoria, Australia’, Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol 29, No 1, pp 31–44.
26.
HuethD.StrongJ.E. (1984), ‘A critical review of the travel cost, hedonic travel cost and household production models for measurement of quality changes in recreational experiences’, Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol 13, No 2, pp 187–198.
27.
LaymanR.C.BoyceJ.R.CriddleK.R. (1996), ‘Economic valuation of the Chinook salmon sport fishery of the Gulkana River, Alaska, under current and alternate management plans’, Land Economics, Vol 72, No 1, p 113.
28.
LockwoodM.TracyK. (1995), ‘Nonmarket economic valuation of an urban recreation park’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 27, No 2, p 155.
29.
LongP.T.PerdueR.R. (1990), ‘The economic impact of rural festivals and special events: Assessing the spatial distribution of expenditures’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol 28, pp 10–14.
30.
LuzarE.J.HotvedtJ.E.GanC. (1992), ‘Economic valuation of deer hunting on Louisiana public land: A travel cost analysis’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 24, No 2, pp 99–113.
31.
McConnellK.E. (1999), ‘Household labour market choices and the demand for recreation’, Land Economics, Vol 75, No 3, p 466.
32.
McKeanJ.R.WalshR.G.JohnsonD.M. (1996), ‘Closely related good prices in the travel cost model’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 78, No 3, p 640.
33.
MurphyP.E.CarmichaelB.A. (1991), ‘Assessing the tourism benefits of an open access sport tournament: The 1989 B.C. Winter Games’, Journal of Travel Research, Vol 29, pp 32–36.
34.
PetersonG.L.StynesD.J.ArnoldJ.R. (1985), ‘The stability of a recreation demand model over time’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 17, No 2, pp 121–132.
35.
RandallA. (1994), ‘A difficulty with the travel cost method’, Land Economics, Vol 70, No 1, p 88.
36.
ReadM.SindenJ.A.BransonJ.SturgessN. (1999), ‘Recreational use values for Victoria's parks’, paper presented at 43rd Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Christchurch, 20–22 January.
37.
SiderelisC.MooreR. (1995), ‘Outdoor recreation net benefits of rail-trails’, Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 27, No 4, p 344.
38.
SiderelisC.MooreR.LeeJu-Hee (2000), ‘Incorporating users’ perceptions of site quality in a recreation travel cost model', Journal of Leisure Research, Vol 32, No 4, p 406.
39.
SmithV.K. (1989), ‘Taking stock of progress with travel cost recreation demand methods: Theory and implementation’, Marine Resource Economics, Vol 6, pp 276–310.
40.
StoecklN. (2003a), ‘A “quick and dirty” travel cost model’, Tourism Economics, Vol 9, No 3, pp 325–335.
41.
StoecklN. (2003b), ‘Measurement error and functional form: Implications for welfare estimates’, Applied Economics Letters, Vol 10, pp 259–270.
42.
WardF.A.BealD. (2000), Valuing Nature with Travel Cost Models: A Manual, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
43.
WhittenS.M.BennettJ.W. (2002), ‘A travel cost study of duck hunting in the Upper South East of South Australia’, Australian Geographer, Vol 33, No 2, pp 207–221.
