This paper gives a social capital perspective on the internationalization process of new firms. The point of departure is international new ventures (INVs) and their frequent use of hybrid structures for government of international activities. The purpose is to shed new light on the INV phenomenon by studying the role of social relationships in the establishment, management and performance of international governance structures and access to resources for international market expansion. By combining knowledge from the international entrepreneurship literature with social capital theory, the authors construct several propositions on the relationship between properties of social capital embedded in the new firm and their ability to form effective international market channels and deliver high long-term performance. This conceptual study suggests that social capital is indeed conducive to the overall performance of INVs. However, empirical research is desirable – and, based on the propositions from this study, the authors propose a research agenda emphasizing the need for a longitudinal study of INV organizations with regard to the role of social capital in attracting and controlling international market resources.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. K. (2002), ‘Social capital: Prospects for a new concept’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 27, No 1, pp 17–40.
2.
AnderssonS.WictorI. (2003), ‘Innovative internationalisation in new firms: Born globals – the Swedish case’, Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Vol 1, No 3, pp 249–276.
3.
AreniusP. M. (2002), ‘Creation of firm-level social capital, its exploitation, and the process of early internationalization’, doctoral thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Strategy and International Business, Helsinki.
4.
AspelundA.MoenØ. (2001), ‘A generation perspective on small firm internationalization: From traditional exporters and flexible specialists to born globals’, Advances in International Marketing, Vol 11, pp 195–223.
5.
AspelundA.MoenØ. (2005), ‘Small international firms: Typology, performance and implications’, International Management Review, Vol 45, No 3, pp 37–57.
6.
BellJ. (1995), ‘The internationalization of small computer software firms: A further challenge to “stage” theories’, European Journal of Marketing, Vol 29, No 8, pp 60–75.
7.
BlomstermoA.SharmaD. (2003), ‘Born globals – a study of learning in networks’, in Proceedings from the Sixth Conference on International Business, Vasa University, Finland.
8.
BrushC. G.GreeneP.HartM. M. (2001), ‘From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base’, Academy of Management Executive, Vol 15, No 1, pp 64–78.
9.
BurgelO.MurrayG. C. (2000), ‘The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries’, Journal of International Marketing, Vol 8, No 2, pp 33–62.
10.
BurtR. (1993), ‘The network entrepreneur’, in SwebergR., ed, (2000), Entrepreneurship – The Social Science View, Oxford Management Readers, Oxford, pp 281–307.
11.
CovielloN.MunroeH. (1997), ‘Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms’, International Business Review, Vol 6, No 4, pp 361–386.
12.
CrickD.ChaudhryS.BatstoneS. (2001), ‘An investigation into the overseas expansion of small Asian-owned U.K. firms’, Small Business Economics, Vol 16, pp 75–94.
13.
CrickD.JonesM. (2000), ‘Small high-technology firms and international high-technology markets’, Journal of International Marketing, Vol 8, No 2, pp 63–85.
14.
DasguptaP. (1988), ‘Trust as a commodity’, in GambettaD., ed, Trust: Making and Breaking of Cooperative Relations, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 49–72.
15.
GabrielssonM.KirpalaniV. H. M. (2004), ‘Born globals: How to reach new business space rapidly’, International Business Review, Vol 13, pp 555–571.
16.
GranovetterM. (1985), ‘Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, Vol 91, No 3, pp 481–510.
17.
JohansonJ.MattssonL. G. (1988), ‘Internationalisation in industrial systems – a network approach’, in HoodN.VahlneJ.-E., eds, Strategies in Global Competition, Croom Helm, New York, pp 287–314.
18.
JollyV. K.AlahuhtaM.JeannetJ. P. (1992), ‘Challenging the incumbents: How high technology start-ups compete globally’, Journal of Strategic Change, Vol 1, pp 71–82.
19.
JonesM. (1999), ‘The internationalization process of small high-technology firms’, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol 7, No 4, pp 15–41.
20.
KeebleD.LawsonC.SmithH. L.MooreB.WilkinsonW. (1998), ‘Internationalisation processes, networking and local embeddedness in technology-intensive small firms’, Small Business Economics, Vol 11, pp 327–342.
21.
KnightG. A.CavusgilS. T. (1996), ‘The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory’, Advances in International Marketing, Vol 8, pp 11–26.
22.
LichtensteinB.BrushC. (2001), ‘How do “resource bundles” develop and change in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol 25, No 3, pp 37–58.
23.
MadsenT. K.RasmussenE.ServaisP. (2000), ‘Differences and similarities between born globals and other types of exporters’, Advances in International Marketing, Vol 10, pp 247–265.
24.
MadsenT. K.ServaisP. (1997), ‘The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process?’International Business Review, Vol 6, No 6, pp 561–583.
25.
McAuleyA. (1999), ‘Entrepreneurial instant exporters in Scottish arts and crafts sector’, Journal of International Marketing, Vol 7, No 4, pp 67–82.
26.
McDougallP. P.ShaneS.OviattB. M. (1994), ‘Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol 9, pp 469–487.
27.
MoenØ. (2002), ‘The born globals – a new generation of small European exporters’, International Marketing Review, Vol 19, No 2/3, pp 156–175.
28.
MoenØ.ServaisP. (2002), ‘Born global or gradual global? Examining the export behaviour of small and medium-sized enterprises’, Journal of International Marketing, Vol 10, No 3, pp 49–72.
29.
NahapietJ.GhoshalS. (1998), ‘Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage’, Academy of Management Review, Vol 23, No 2, pp 242–266.
30.
NooteboomB. (1996), ‘Trust, opportunism and governance: A process and control model’, Organization Studies, Vol 17, No 6, pp 985–1010.
31.
OviattB. M.McDougallP. P. (1994), ‘Toward a theory of international new ventures’, Journal of International Business Studies, First Quarter, pp 45–64.
32.
RialpA.RialpJ.KnightG. A. (2005), ‘The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: What do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific enquiry’, International Business Review, Vol 14, pp 147–166.
33.
SharmaD.BlomstermoA. (2003), ‘The internationalization process of born globals: A network view’, International Business Review, Vol 12, pp 739–753.
34.
SørheimR. (2003), ‘The pre-investment behaviour of business angels: A social capital approach’, Venture Capital, Vol 5, No 4, pp 337–364.
35.
VesperK. H. (1990), New Venture Strategies, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
36.
WatkinsM. (2002), Negotiating Strategic Alliances, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA.
37.
YeohP.-L. (2000), ‘Information acquisition activities: A study of global start-up exporting companies’, Journal of International Marketing, Vol 8, No 3, pp 36–60.
38.
ZahraS. A. (2005), ‘A theory of international new ventures: A decade of research’, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 36, No 1, pp 20–28.
