Until recently, it was unclear under US case law whether university patent policies were sufficient to obligate university personnel to assign their inventions to the university without a signed invention-assignment agreement. This paper examines the question through recent case law. These cases indicate a trend in support of university claims that patent policies alone may be sufficient to require assignment under certain circumstances. In addition to discussing the sufficiency of patent policies to obligate academics to assign, this paper also considers the applicability of patent policies to students.
DreyfusCooperRochelle (2000), ‘Collaborative research: Conflicts on authorship, ownership, and accountability’, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol 53, p 1162.
3.
KreissRobertA. (2000), ‘The “in writing” requirement for copyright and patent transfers: Are the circuits in conflict?’, University of Dayton Law Review, Vol 26, p 43.
4.
KulkarniSunil (1995), ‘All professors create equally: Why faculty should have complete control over the intellectual property rights in their creations’, Hastings Law Journal, Vol 47, p 221.
5.
LiebersteinStanley (1998), ‘Relevant concepts in determining difficult disputes over ownership’, Journal of the Association of University Technology Managers, Vol 10.
6.
PatelSandhip (1996), ‘Graduate students' ownership and attribution rights in intellectual property’, Indiana Law Journal, Vol 71, p 481.
