Intellectual property competence can assist individuals and organizations to capitalize on opportunities presented by accelerating developments in the knowledge economy. Engineers translate ideas into concrete solutions, which are frequently useful and commercially valuable, if the intrinsic intellectual property has been identified and protected. Professional bodies are beginning to acknowledge the importance of intellectual property competence as an enterprise skill for new graduates. Universities must rethink undergraduate curricula to enhance students' entrepreneurial skills and widen participation, while research strategies must take account of the growing fuzziness of disciplinary boundaries. Where faculties are expected to deliver to new agendas, despite shrinking resources and an overcrowded syllabus, self-managed learning activities work with assessment strategies to achieve new independent learning outcomes.
BaumolW. (2004), ‘Entrepreneurial cultures and countercultures’, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol 3, No 3, pp 316–326.
2.
BessenJ. (2003), ‘Patent thickets: Strategic patenting of complex technologies’, Social Science Research Network Electronic Library, http://ssrn.com/abstract=327760.
3.
BoyleJames (2003), ‘Ideas in cyberspace’, The Eversheds Lecture, Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (RSA), London, March, http://www.rsa.org.uk/acrobat/james_boyle190303.pdf.
4.
BurridgeR., ed (2002), Effective Learning & Teaching in Law, Kogan Page, London.
5.
BylesL.SoetendorpR. (2002), ‘Law teaching for other programmes’, in BurridgeR., ed (2002), Effective Learning & Teaching in Law, Kogan Page, London.
6.
de la HarpeB.RadloffA.WyberJ. (2000), ‘What do professional skills mean for different disciplines in a business school? Lessons learned from integrating professional skills across the curriculum’, in RustC., ed, Improving Student Learning through the Disciplines, Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, pp 9–23.
7.
DelantyG. (2001), Challenging Knowledge: The University in the Knowledge Society, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
8.
DodridgeM. (1999), ‘Learning outcomes and their assessment in higher education’, IEEEngineering Science & Education, Vol 8, No 4, August, pp 162–168.
9.
GibbonsM. (2000), The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London.
10.
HennesseyW. (1999), ‘The place of intellectual property teaching in the curricula of universities and technical institutes’, online paper, Franklin Pierce Law Center, Concord, NH.
Japan Patent Office (2001), ‘Nationwide promotion of intellectual property education’, Japan Patent Office Annual Report 2001, Part 1, chapter 4, Japan Patent Office, Tokyo.
13.
KaplanK.KaplanJ. (2003), ‘Incorporating intellectual property into engineering education’, paper presented at the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Nashville, TN, 22–25 June.
14.
KerwinA. (1993), ‘None too solid: Medical ignorance’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation, Vol 15, No 2, pp 166–185.
15.
KnowlesM. (1984), The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species, 3rd edition, Gulf Publishing, Houston, TX.
16.
LakhanS. E. (2002), Stop Piracy with Edification: Intellectual Property Education in School, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
17.
LeeO. (2002), ‘Engineering students' Moot Court debates the question: “Is Software Patentable?”’, Journal of Information Technology & Law, No 1, http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/02–1/lee.html.
18.
McLaughlanR. (2004), Review of the Engineering Resource Package, CRO312, Australian National Occupational Health and Safety Commission, Canberra.
RamsdenP. (1992), Learning to Teach in Higher Education, Routledge, London.
21.
RivetteK.KleinD. (2000), Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
22.
RowntreeD. (1981), Developing Courses for Students, McGraw-Hill, London.
23.
SBA (2003), Small Business Research Summary 2003, Small Business Administration, Washington, DC.
24.
SoetendorpR. (1996), ‘Patent information in the academic context’, World Patent Information, Vol 18, No 4, pp 219–226.
25.
SoetendorpR. (2002), ‘Intellectual property rights awareness – a business enterprise skill for undergraduate engineers’, paper presented at Australasian Association for Engineering Education 13th Annual Conference, Canberra, 30 September-2 October.
26.
TakagiY. (2004), ‘Teaching of intellectual property’, paper presented at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Arab Regional Conference on the Teaching of Intellectual Property, Dubai.
27.
WitteM. (1994), Cited in ‘UA Prof locks horns with science’, Arizona Daily Wildcat, 1 December 1995 (http://wildcat.arizona.edu).
