Death is considered by some commentators to be problematic for the inhabitants of a late modern era, so that when individuals are confronted by death they revert to using traditional institutions and practices. This paper draws on sociological research exploring Scottish funeral practices to consider whether this is the case, or whether individuals are able to employ a process of self-reflexivity even when they are planning the funeral of someone about whom they cared. Two funerals are described in the article, and the suggestion is made that their organisers behaved some of the time as reflexive individuals as well as also making use of the traditional authorities of modernity, such as the family and church.
ADAMSM (2003) ‘The reflexive self and culture: a critique’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 54, no. 2 pp. 221–238. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0007131032000080212]
DAVIEG (1994) Religion in Britain since 1945: believing without belonging.Oxford: Blackwell.
8.
DRAKEFORDM (1998) ‘Last Rights? Funerals, Poverty and Social Exclusion’, Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 27, no. 4 pp. 507–524. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279498005376]
9.
EMKEI (2002) ‘Why the sad face? Secularization and the changing function of funerals in Newfoundland’, Mortality, Vol. 7, no. 3 pp. 269–284. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1357627021000025432]
10.
GARCES-FOLEYK, and HOLCOMBJS (2006) Contemporary American funerals: personalizing tradition. In Garces-FoleyK (Ed.) Death and religion in a changing world.Armonk, NY: M E Sharpe. Pp. 207–227.
11.
GIDDENSA (1990) The Consequences of Modernity.Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
GIDDENSA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity.Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
GILDINGM (2010) ‘Reflexivity over and above convention: the new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 61, no. 4 pp. 757–777. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01340.x]
HOWARTHG (1996) Last Rites.Amityville, NY: Baywood.
16.
HOWARTHG (2007) Death & Dying, a sociological introduction.Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
JOHNSTONE-BURTR, GIBBSA, and WYNBURNEJ (2005) The complete book of funeral planning, readings and music.London: Foulsham.
18.
LASHS (1994) Reflexivity and its Doubles: Structure, Aesthetics, Community. In BeckU, GiddensA, and LashS.Reflexive Modernization.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Pp. 110–173.
19.
LEER M (1993) Doing Research on Sensitive Topics.London: Sage.
20.
MORRELLJ, and SMITHS (2006) We need to talk about the funeral.Bedlinog: Accent Press Limited.
21.
MOUZELISN (1999) Exploring post-traditional orders: individual reflexivity, ‘pure relations’ and duality of structure. In O'BrienM, PennaS, and HayC (Eds.) Theorizing Modernity.Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman Limited. Pp. 83–97.
PARSONSB (2003) ‘Conflict in the context of care: an examination of role conflict between the bereaved and the funeral director in the UK’, Mortality, Vol. 8, no. 1 pp. 67–87. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1357627021000063133]
24.
RICHARDSL (2005) Handling qualitative data, a practical guide.London: Sage.
25.
SCHÄFERC (2007) ‘Post-mortem personalization: pastoral power and the New Zealand funeral director’, Mortality, Vol. 12, no. 1 pp. 4–21. [doi://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13576270601088319]
26.
SMITHM (2009) ‘The Church of Scotland and the Funeral Industry in Nineteenth-century Edinburgh’, The Scottish Historical Review, Vol. 88, no. 225, pp. 108–133.
27.
TAYLOR-GOOBYP (2005) ‘Pervasive Uncertainty in Second Modernity: an Empirical Test’Sociological Research Online, Volume 10, Issue 4.
